在 PLOS Biology 上预先注册发布。
Premiering pre-registration at PLOS Biology.
机构信息
Public Library of Science, San Francisco, California, United States of America and Cambridge, United Kingdom.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 31;20(3):e3001611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001611. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Abstract
Pre-registration promises to address some of the problems with traditional peer-review. As we publish our first Registered Report, we take stock of two years of submissions and the future possibilities of this approach.
摘要
预注册有望解决传统同行评审的一些问题。在我们发表第一篇已注册报告之际，我们对两年来的投稿情况进行了评估，并探讨了这种方法的未来可能性。
相似文献
1
Premiering pre-registration at PLOS Biology.在 PLOS Biology 上预先注册发布。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 31;20(3):e3001611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001611. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture.问题不在于专业出版，而在于发表论文或出局的文化。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):617-619. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0015-z. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
3
Peer review as a measurable responsibility of those who publish: The peer review debt index.同行评审作为发表者的一项可衡量的责任：同行评审债务指数。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Oct;161:110997. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110997. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
To publish or not to publish.发表还是不发表。
J Lab Clin Med. 2005 Apr;145(4):221; discussion 222. doi: 10.1016/j.lab.2005.02.005.
5
Open-access Mega-journals in Health and Life Sciences: What Every Researcher needs to know about this Publishing Model.健康与生命科学领域的开放获取大型期刊：每位研究人员需要了解的这种出版模式。
Curr Drug Res Rev. 2022;14(1):3-5. doi: 10.2174/2589977514666220209101713.
6
The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.非洲研究人员在国际期刊上发表研究文章的障碍、同行评审过程以及掠夺性期刊这一有争议的问题：一篇评论
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 14;32:119. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.119.18351. eCollection 2019.
7
How many submissions are needed to discover friendly suggested reviewers?需要提交多少份稿件才能发现友好的推荐审稿人？
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0284212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284212. eCollection 2023.
8
To publish or not to publish.发表还是不发表。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Sep-Oct;19(5):2-3.
9
Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.掠夺性出版还是缺乏同行评审透明度？-小儿泌尿外科索引开放和非开放获取文章的当代分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Apr;15(2):159.e1-159.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.019. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: relevance for research in clinical neuropsychology.稿件和基金申请的同行评审：对临床神经心理学研究的相关性
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1992 Nov;14(6):976-80. doi: 10.1080/01688639208402548.
引用本文的文献
1
Reflecting on 2022.反思 2022 年。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Dec 16;20(12):e3001957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001957. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Registered reports in forensic science.法医学领域的预注册报告。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Nov 30;9(11):221076. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221076. eCollection 2022 Nov.
本文引用的文献
1
The effect of apathy and compulsivity on planning and stopping in sequential decision-making.冷漠和强迫对序列决策中计划和停止的影响。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 31;20(3):e3001566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001566. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model.注册报告与标准出版模式的研究质量初步证据比较。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):990-997. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery.探索性研究的预先注册：从发现的黄金时代中学习。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Mar 26;18(3):e3000690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000690. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Frontloading selectivity: A third way in scientific publishing?前置选择性：科学出版的第三种方式？
PLoS Biol. 2020 Mar 25;18(3):e3000693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000693. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Improving the Efficiency of Grant and Journal Peer Review: Registered Reports Funding.提高资助和期刊同行评审效率：注册报告资助
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):773. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx081.
Zotero 插件