Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 5A1, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Jul;69(7):868-879. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02235-y. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Hospital policies forbidding or limiting families from visiting relatives on the intensive care unit (ICU) has affected patients, families, healthcare professionals, and patient- and family-centered care (PFCC). We sought to refine evidence-informed consensus statements to guide the creation of ICU visitation policies during the current COVID-19 pandemic and future pandemics and to identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation and sustained uptake in Canadian ICUs.
We created consensus statements from 36 evidence-informed experiences (i.e., impacts on patients, families, healthcare professionals, and PFCC) and 63 evidence-informed strategies (i.e., ways to improve restricted visitation) identified during a modified Delphi process (described elsewhere). Over two half-day virtual meetings on 7 and 8 April 2021, 45 stakeholders (patients, families, researchers, clinicians, decision-makers) discussed and refined these consensus statements. Through qualitative descriptive content analysis, we evaluated the following points for 99 consensus statements: 1) their importance for improving restricted visitation policies; 2) suggested modifications to make them more applicable; and 3) facilitators and barriers to implementing these statements when creating ICU visitation policies.
Through discussion, participants identified three areas for improvement: 1) clarity, 2) accessibility, and 3) feasibility. Stakeholders identified several implementation facilitators (clear, flexible, succinct, and prioritized statements available in multiple modes), barriers (perceived lack of flexibility, lack of partnership between government and hospital, change fatigue), and ways to measure and monitor their use (e.g., family satisfaction, qualitative interviews).
Existing guidance on policies that disallowed or restricted visitation in intensive care units were confusing, hard to operationalize, and often lacked supporting evidence. Prioritized, succinct, and clear consensus statements allowing for local adaptability are necessary to guide the creation of ICU visitation policies and to optimize PFCC.
医院禁止或限制家属探访重症监护病房(ICU)的政策,影响了患者、家属、医护人员以及以患者和家庭为中心的护理(PFCC)。我们旨在完善循证共识声明,以指导在当前 COVID-19 大流行和未来大流行期间制定 ICU 探视政策,并确定在加拿大 ICU 实施和持续采用这些政策的障碍和促进因素。
我们从经过修改的 Delphi 流程(详见其他部分)中确定的 36 项循证经验(即对患者、家属、医护人员和 PFCC 的影响)和 63 项循证策略(即改善限制探视的方法)中创建了共识声明。在 2021 年 4 月 7 日和 8 日的两次为期半天的虚拟会议上,45 名利益相关者(患者、家属、研究人员、临床医生、决策者)讨论并完善了这些共识声明。通过定性描述性内容分析,我们评估了 99 项共识声明的以下几点:1)对改善限制探视政策的重要性;2)提出的修改建议,使它们更具适用性;3)在制定 ICU 探视政策时实施这些声明的促进因素和障碍。
通过讨论,参与者确定了三个改进领域:1)清晰度,2)可及性,3)可行性。利益相关者确定了一些实施促进因素(清晰、灵活、简洁、按优先级排列的声明以多种方式提供)、障碍(感知缺乏灵活性、政府与医院之间缺乏合作、变革疲劳)以及衡量和监测其使用的方法(例如,家属满意度、定性访谈)。
现有的关于禁止或限制重症监护病房探视的政策指南令人困惑,难以实施,而且往往缺乏支持证据。优先、简洁、明确的共识声明,允许地方适应性,是制定 ICU 探视政策和优化 PFCC 的必要条件。