Nascimento Dahan da Cunha, Rolnick Nicholas, Neto Ivo Vieira de Sousa, Severin Richard, Beal Fabiani Lage Rodrigues
Department of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasília (UCB), Brasília, Brazil.
Department of Gerontology, Catholic University of Brasília (UCB), Brasília, Brazil.
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 11;13:808622. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.808622. eCollection 2022.
Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is a modality with growing interest in the last decade and has been recognized as a critical tool in rehabilitation medicine, athletic and clinical populations. Besides its potential for positive benefits, BFRT has the capability to induce adverse responses. BFRT may evoke increased blood pressure, abnormal cardiovascular responses and impact vascular health. Furthermore, some important concerns with the use of BFRT exists for individuals with established cardiovascular disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease patients). In addition, considering the potential risks of thrombosis promoted by BFRT in medically compromised populations, BFRT use warrants caution for patients that already display impaired blood coagulability, loss of antithrombotic mechanisms in the vessel wall, and stasis caused by immobility (e.g., COVID-19 patients, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, orthopedic post-surgery, anabolic steroid and ergogenic substance users, rheumatoid arthritis, and pregnant/postpartum women). To avoid untoward outcomes and ensure that BFRT is properly used, efficacy endpoints such as a questionnaire for risk stratification involving a review of the patient's medical history, signs, and symptoms indicative of underlying pathology is strongly advised. Here we present a model for BFRT pre-participation screening to theoretically reduce risk by excluding people with comorbidities or medically complex histories that could unnecessarily heighten intra- and/or post-exercise occurrence of adverse events. We propose this risk stratification tool as a framework to allow clinicians to use their knowledge, skills and expertise to assess and manage any risks related to the delivery of an appropriate BFRT exercise program. The questionnaires for risk stratification are adapted to guide clinicians for the referral, assessment, and suggestion of other modalities/approaches if/when necessary. Finally, the risk stratification might serve as a guideline for clinical protocols and future randomized controlled trial studies.
血流限制训练(BFRT)是过去十年中越来越受关注的一种训练方式,已被公认为康复医学、运动员群体和临床人群的关键工具。除了其潜在的积极益处外,BFRT也有可能引发不良反应。BFRT可能会导致血压升高、心血管反应异常并影响血管健康。此外,对于已确诊患有心血管疾病的个体(如高血压、糖尿病和慢性肾病患者),使用BFRT还存在一些重要问题。此外,考虑到BFRT在医疗状况不佳人群中促进血栓形成的潜在风险,对于已经出现凝血功能受损、血管壁抗血栓机制丧失以及因不动导致的血流淤滞的患者(如新冠肺炎患者、糖尿病患者、高血压患者、慢性肾病患者、心血管疾病患者、骨科术后患者、合成代谢类固醇和增强体能物质使用者、类风湿性关节炎患者以及孕妇/产后妇女),使用BFRT需谨慎。为避免不良后果并确保BFRT的正确使用,强烈建议采用疗效终点指标,例如通过一份风险分层问卷来回顾患者的病史、体征和表明潜在病理状况的症状。在此,我们提出一种BFRT参与前筛查模型,从理论上通过排除患有合并症或病史复杂的人群来降低风险,这些人群可能会不必要地增加运动期间和/或运动后不良事件的发生几率。我们建议将这种风险分层工具作为一个框架,使临床医生能够运用他们的知识、技能和专业知识来评估和管理与实施适当的BFRT运动计划相关的任何风险。风险分层问卷经过调整,以指导临床医生在必要时进行转诊、评估,并建议采用其他训练方式/方法。最后,风险分层可作为临床方案和未来随机对照试验研究的指导原则。