Bellissimo Gabriella F, Ducharme Jeremy, Mang Zachary, Millender Desmond, Smith Jessica, Stork Matthew J, Little Johnathan P, Deyhle Michael R, Gibson Ann L, de Castro Magalhaes Flavio, Amorim Fabiano
Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 10;13:824154. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.824154. eCollection 2022.
The purpose of this study was to compare the acute physiological, perceptual, and enjoyment responses between bodyweight high-intensity interval exercise (BW-HIIE) and treadmill running high-intensity interval exercise HIIE (RUN-HIIE).
Twelve adults [age: 29.5 ± 5.3 years; weight: 70.9 ± 15.0 kg; height: 167.9 ± 8.9 cm; peak oxygen consumption (VO peak): 48.7 ± 6.5 ml min·kg] performed both RUN-HIIE and BW-HIIE. RUN-HIIE consisted of two sets of 5, 60-s (s) run intervals at 100% of the speed achieved during VO peak testing followed by 60s of walking at 4.02 km/h. BW-HIIE consisted of two sets of 5, 60s 'all-out' effort calisthenic exercises followed by 60s of marching in place at 100 steps per minute. Oxygen consumption (VO), blood lactate (B), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during exercise. Physical activity enjoyment (PACES) was assessed post-exercise. Creatine Kinase (CK) was measured before exercise and 48-h post-exercise. Muscle soreness was assessed before exercise, post-exercise, and 48-h post-exercise.
Oxygen consumption relative to VO peak was higher ( < 0.001) during RUN-HIIE (88 ± 3%) compared to BW-HIIE (77 ± 4%). HR relative to HRpeak was higher ( = 0.002) for RUN-HIIE (93 ± 1%) compared to BW-HIIE (88 ± 2%). B was higher ( < 0.001) after BW-HIIE (11.2 ± 3.2 mmol/l) compared to RUN-HIIE (6.9 ± 2.0 mmol/l). Average RPE achieved was higher ( = 0.003) during BW-HIIE (16 ± 2) than RUN-HIIE (14 ± 2). PACES was similar for RUN-HIIE and BW-HIIE ( > 0.05). No differences ( > 0.05) in CK were observed between RUN-HIIE and BW-HIIE.
Our results indicate 'all-out' calisthenic exercise can elicit vigorous cardiorespiratory, B, and RPE responses. Implementing this style of exercise into training requires minimal space, no equipment, and may elicit cardiometabolic adaptations seen with traditional forms of high-intensity exercise.
本研究旨在比较体重高强度间歇训练(BW-HIIE)和跑步机跑步高强度间歇训练(RUN-HIIE)之间的急性生理、感知和愉悦感反应。
12名成年人[年龄:29.5±5.3岁;体重:70.9±15.0千克;身高:167.9±8.9厘米;峰值耗氧量(VO峰值):48.7±6.5毫升·分钟·千克]进行了RUN-HIIE和BW-HIIE训练。RUN-HIIE包括两组,每组5次,每次60秒的跑步间歇,速度为VO峰值测试时达到的速度的100%,随后是60秒以4.02千米/小时的速度行走。BW-HIIE包括两组,每组5次,每次60秒的“全力”体能训练,随后是60秒以每分钟100步的速度原地踏步。在运动过程中测量耗氧量(VO)、血乳酸(B)、心率(HR)和主观用力程度分级(RPE)。运动后评估身体活动愉悦感(PACES)。在运动前和运动后48小时测量肌酸激酶(CK)。在运动前、运动后和运动后48小时评估肌肉酸痛情况。
与BW-HIIE(77±4%)相比,RUN-HIIE期间相对于VO峰值的耗氧量更高(<0.001)(88±3%)。与BW-HIIE(88±2%)相比,RUN-HIIE相对于HR峰值的HR更高(=0.002)(93±1%)。与RUN-HIIE(6.9±2.0毫摩尔/升)相比,BW-HIIE后B更高(<0.001)(11.2±3.2毫摩尔/升)。BW-HIIE期间达到的平均RPE(16±2)高于RUN-HIIE(14±2)(=0.003)。RUN-HIIE和BW-HIIE的PACES相似(>0.05)。RUN-HIIE和BW-HIIE之间未观察到CK的差异(>0.05)。
我们的结果表明,“全力”体能训练可引发强烈的心肺、B和RPE反应。将这种运动方式纳入训练所需空间最小,无需设备,且可能引发与传统高强度运动形式相同的心脏代谢适应性变化。