• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Estimated prevalence of eating disorders in Malaysia based on a diagnostic screen.基于诊断筛查的马来西亚饮食失调症估计患病率。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Jun;55(6):763-775. doi: 10.1002/eat.23711. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Food addiction in a Spanish sample of eating disorders: DSM-5 diagnostic subtype differentiation and validation data.西班牙进食障碍样本中的食物成瘾:DSM-5 诊断亚型的区分和验证数据。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014 Nov;22(6):389-96. doi: 10.1002/erv.2311. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
3
The prevalence and correlates of bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and anorexia nervosa: The Saudi National Mental Health Survey.神经性贪食症、暴食症和神经性厌食症的患病率及其相关因素:沙特国家心理健康调查。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov;55(11):1541-1552. doi: 10.1002/eat.23790. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
Psychiatric and medical correlates of DSM-5 eating disorders in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States.美国全国代表性成年人样本中 DSM-5 饮食障碍的精神科和医学相关性。
Int J Eat Disord. 2019 Jan;52(1):42-50. doi: 10.1002/eat.23004.
5
Prevalence of diagnosed eating disorders in US transgender adults and youth in insurance claims.美国保险索赔中诊断为进食障碍的跨性别成年人和青少年的患病率。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Jun;55(6):801-809. doi: 10.1002/eat.23729. Epub 2022 May 7.
6
A screening tool for detecting eating disorder risk and diagnostic symptoms among college-age women.用于筛查大学生女性进食障碍风险和诊断症状的工具。
J Am Coll Health. 2019 May-Jun;67(4):357-366. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1483936. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) among adult eating disorder patients.成年饮食失调患者中注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的症状。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1093-1.
8
Comparing ICD-11 and DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses with the Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (ED-Quest).将国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM-5)的饮食失调诊断与慕尼黑饮食和喂养障碍问卷(ED-Quest)进行比较。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Sep;56(9):1826-1831. doi: 10.1002/eat.24010. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
9
Drive for thinness provides an alternative, more meaningful, severity indicator than the DSM-5 severity indices for eating disorders.追求苗条身材为进食障碍提供了一个比 DSM-5 严重程度指标更有意义的替代严重程度指标。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):482-498. doi: 10.1002/erv.2776. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
10
Identifying eating disorders in adolescents and adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review of screening questionnaires.识别超重或肥胖的青少年和成年人中的饮食障碍:筛查问卷的系统评价。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Sep;55(9):1171-1193. doi: 10.1002/eat.23769. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The global prevalence of anemia in patients with anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.神经性厌食症患者贫血的全球患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 7;13(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02647-7.
2
Prevalence, Phenotype, and Correlates of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms in the Gulf Cooperation Council: An Underserved Region.海湾合作委员会中回避/限制型食物摄入障碍症状的患病率、表型及相关因素:一个未得到充分服务的地区
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun;58(6):1060-1071. doi: 10.1002/eat.24400. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
3
Effectiveness of written emotional disclosure interventions for eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.书面情绪表露干预对饮食失调的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Nutr. 2024 Dec 10;11:1476956. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1476956. eCollection 2024.
4
Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Review and Recent Advances.回避/限制性摄食障碍:综述与最新进展
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Jul;22(3):288-300. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20240008. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
5
The need for more inclusive measurement to advance equity in eating disorders prevention.需要更具包容性的衡量标准来促进饮食失调预防中的公平性。
Eat Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;32(6):798-816. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2024.2328460. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
6
Assessing the factor structure of the Eating Attitude Test-26 among undergraduate students in Malaysia.评估马来西亚本科生中饮食态度测试-26的因子结构。
Front Nutr. 2023 Nov 16;10:1212919. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1212919. eCollection 2023.
7
Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in New Zealand and Australia: a scoping review.新西兰和澳大利亚的回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID):一项范围综述
J Eat Disord. 2023 Nov 6;11(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00922-9.
8
The relationship between body dissatisfaction and attentional bias to thin bodies in Malaysian Chinese and White Australian women: a dot probe study.马来西亚华裔女性和澳大利亚白人女性的身体不满与对瘦体型的注意偏向之间的关系:一项点探测研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Sep 20;10(9):230674. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230674. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS) in a community sample of adults.九项回避/限制型食物摄入障碍筛查量表(NIAS)阿拉伯语译本在成年社区样本中的心理测量学特性
J Eat Disord. 2023 Aug 23;11(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00874-0.
10
What do we know about the epidemiology of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents? A systematic review of the literature.我们对儿童和青少年回避/限制型食物摄入障碍的流行病学了解多少?文献系统评价。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2023 Mar;31(2):226-246. doi: 10.1002/erv.2964. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of robust outlier detection methods for zero-inflated complex data.零膨胀复杂数据的稳健异常值检测方法评估
J Appl Stat. 2019 Sep 27;47(7):1144-1167. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1671961. eCollection 2020.
2
Incidence and outcomes of eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间饮食失调的发病率及转归
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 27;220(5):1-3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.105.
3
Depression and anxiety in Malaysian population during third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.马来西亚人口在新冠疫情第三波期间的抑郁和焦虑情况。
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021 Oct-Dec;12:100868. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100868. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
4
Epidemiology of binge eating disorder: prevalence, course, comorbidity, and risk factors.暴食障碍的流行病学:患病率、病程、共病和危险因素。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;34(6):525-531. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000750.
5
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Eating Disorders: A Wake-Up Call for the Future of Eating Disorders Among Adolescents and Young Adults.新冠疫情与饮食失调:对青少年和年轻人饮食失调未来的警钟。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Oct;69(4):535-537. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.07.014.
6
Diseases of affluence? A systematic review of the literature on socioeconomic diversity in eating disorders.富裕病?关于饮食失调中社会经济多样性的文献系统综述。
Eat Behav. 2021 Dec;43:101548. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101548. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Psychometric properties of the adapted Malay Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q 6.0) among university students in Malaysia.适应马来西亚大学生的马来版饮食失调问卷-6.0(EDE-Q 6.0)的心理测量学特性。
Eat Behav. 2021 Aug;42:101533. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101533. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Burden of Eating Disorders in China, 1990-2019: An Updated Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990 - 2019年中国饮食失调负担:全球疾病负担研究2019年的最新系统分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 21;12:632418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632418. eCollection 2021.
9
Disordered eating in a population-based sample of young adults during the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间基于人群的年轻成年人样本中的饮食失调。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jul;54(7):1189-1201. doi: 10.1002/eat.23505. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
The hidden burden of eating disorders: an extension of estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.进食障碍的隐性负担:对 2019 年全球疾病负担研究估计数的扩展。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;8(4):320-328. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00040-7. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

基于诊断筛查的马来西亚饮食失调症估计患病率。

Estimated prevalence of eating disorders in Malaysia based on a diagnostic screen.

作者信息

Chua Sook Ning, Fitzsimmons-Craft Ellen E, Austin S Bryn, Wilfley Denise E, Taylor C Barr

机构信息

Relate Mental Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

School of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Jun;55(6):763-775. doi: 10.1002/eat.23711. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1002/eat.23711
PMID:35366018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9167751/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Eating disorders (EDs) are debilitating health conditions and common across cultures. Recent reports suggest that about 14.0% of university students in Malaysia are at risk for developing an ED, and that prevalence may differ by ethnicity and gender. However, less is known about the prevalence of EDs in nonuniversity populations.

OBJECTIVE

The current study seeks to (1) estimate the prevalence of EDs and ED risk status among adults in Malaysia using an established diagnostic screen; (2) examine gender and ethnic differences between ED diagnostic/risk status groups; and (3) characterize the clinical profile of individuals who screen positive for an ED.

METHOD

We administered the Stanford-Washington University Eating Disorder Screen, an online ED screening tool, to adults in Malaysia in September 2020.

RESULTS

ED risk/diagnostic categories were assigned to 818 participants (ages 18-73 years) of which, 0.8% screened positive for anorexia nervosa, 1.4% for bulimia nervosa, 0.1% for binge-ED, 51.4% for other specified feeding or ED, and 4.8% for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. There was gender parity in the high risk and the overall ED categories. The point prevalence of positive eating pathology screening among Malays was significantly higher than Chinese but no different from Indians.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of EDs using a diagnostic screen in a population-based sample of Malaysians. It is concerning that over 50% of Malaysians reported symptoms of EDs. This study highlights the need to invest more resources in understanding and managing eating pathology in Malaysia.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

This study estimates the prevalence of EDs among adults in Malaysia using an online EDs screen. Over 50% of Malaysians report symptoms of EDs. The study highlights the need for more resources and funding to address this important public health issue through surveillance, prevention, and treatment of EDs in Malaysia.

摘要

未标注

饮食失调(EDs)是使人衰弱的健康状况,且在不同文化中都很常见。最近的报告表明,马来西亚约14.0%的大学生有患饮食失调症的风险,而且患病率可能因种族和性别而异。然而,对于非大学生人群中饮食失调症的患病率了解较少。

目的

本研究旨在(1)使用既定的诊断筛查方法估计马来西亚成年人中饮食失调症的患病率和饮食失调风险状况;(2)检查饮食失调诊断/风险状况组之间的性别和种族差异;(3)描述饮食失调筛查呈阳性的个体的临床特征。

方法

2020年9月,我们向马来西亚成年人发放了斯坦福-华盛顿大学饮食失调筛查工具,这是一种在线饮食失调筛查工具。

结果

818名参与者(年龄在18 - 73岁之间)被归入饮食失调风险/诊断类别,其中,0.8%的人神经性厌食症筛查呈阳性,1.4%的人神经性贪食症筛查呈阳性,0.1%的人暴饮暴食型饮食失调筛查呈阳性,51.4%的人患有其他特定的进食或饮食失调症,4.8%的人患有回避/限制性食物摄入障碍。在高风险和总体饮食失调类别中存在性别均等情况。马来人饮食病理学筛查呈阳性的时点患病率显著高于华人,但与印度人无差异。

讨论

这是第一项在以马来西亚人群为基础的样本中使用诊断筛查方法估计饮食失调症患病率的研究。令人担忧的是,超过50%的马来西亚人报告有饮食失调症状。本研究强调需要投入更多资源来了解和管理马来西亚的饮食病理学问题。

公共意义

本研究使用在线饮食失调筛查工具估计了马来西亚成年人中饮食失调症的患病率。超过50%的马来西亚人报告有饮食失调症状。该研究强调需要更多资源和资金,通过在马来西亚对饮食失调症进行监测、预防和治疗来解决这一重要的公共卫生问题。