Suppr超能文献

执行功能和发散思维预测年轻人和老年人的创造性问题解决能力。

Executive functioning and divergent thinking predict creative problem-solving in young adults and elderlies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):388-396. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01678-8. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

Abstract

The role of executive functioning in creative thinking is under debate. Some authors suggested that increased inhibitory control, a component of executive functioning, is detrimental to creative solutions, whereas others argued that executive functions are central to creative problem-solving, thus questioning Guilford's classical distinction between divergent and convergent thinking. Executive functions decline with age. In this study, we investigated the contributions of executive functioning and its age-related decline and divergent thinking to creative problem-solving. To this aim, we divided our sample of sixty healthy adults into two age groups of young adults (20-26 years) and elderly (60-70 years) and we assessed their creative problem-solving abilities (using the compound remote associate problems) as well as other potential cognitive predictors of creative problem-solving (i.e., impulsivity, divergent thinking, verbal working memory, and decision-making style). A linear regression model revealed that the ability to solve problems creatively is negatively predicted by older age and impulsivity, while positively predicted by divergent thinking and verbal working memory. These findings reveal a combined contribution of executive functions and divergent thinking to creative problem-solving, suggesting that both convergent and divergent processes should be considered in interventions to contrast age-related decline.

摘要

执行功能在创造性思维中的作用存在争议。一些作者认为,执行功能的抑制控制成分的增加不利于创造性解决方案,而另一些作者则认为执行功能是创造性问题解决的核心,从而对 Guilford 的发散思维和聚合思维的经典区分提出质疑。执行功能随年龄增长而下降。在这项研究中,我们研究了执行功能及其与年龄相关的下降以及发散思维对创造性问题解决的贡献。为此,我们将 60 名健康成年人分为两个年龄组:年轻人(20-26 岁)和老年人(60-70 岁),并评估了他们的创造性问题解决能力(使用复合远程联想问题)以及创造性问题解决的其他潜在认知预测因素(即冲动、发散思维、言语工作记忆和决策风格)。线性回归模型表明,创造性解决问题的能力与年龄较大和冲动呈负相关,与发散思维和言语工作记忆呈正相关。这些发现揭示了执行功能和发散思维对创造性问题解决的综合贡献,表明在干预措施中应同时考虑聚合和发散过程,以对抗与年龄相关的下降。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Creative Thinking in Tourette's Syndrome: An Uncharted Topic.妥瑞氏综合征中的创造性思维:一个未知的话题。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 22;12:649814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649814. eCollection 2021.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验