Nordström Peter, Ballin Marcel, Nordström Anna
Unit of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Unit of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;22(6):781-790. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00143-8. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Real-world evidence supporting vaccination against COVID-19 in individuals who have recovered from a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is sparse. We aimed to investigate the long-term protection from a previous infection (natural immunity) and whether natural immunity plus vaccination (hybrid immunity) was associated with additional protection.
In this retrospective cohort study, we formed three cohorts using Swedish nationwide registers managed by the Public Health Agency of Sweden, the National Board of Health and Welfare, and Statistics Sweden. Cohort 1 included unvaccinated individuals with natural immunity matched pairwise on birth year and sex to unvaccinated individuals without natural immunity at baseline. Cohort 2 and cohort 3 included individuals vaccinated with one dose (one-dose hybrid immunity) or two doses (two-dose hybrid immunity) of a COVID-19 vaccine, respectively, after a previous infection, matched pairwise on birth year and sex to individuals with natural immunity at baseline. Outcomes of this study were documented SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 20, 2020, until Oct 4, 2021, and inpatient hospitalisation with COVID-19 as main diagnosis from March 30, 2020, until Sept 5, 2021.
Cohort 1 was comprised of 2 039 106 individuals, cohort 2 of 962 318 individuals, and cohort 3 of 567 810 individuals. During a mean follow-up of 164 days (SD 100), 34 090 individuals with natural immunity in cohort 1 were registered as having had a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection compared with 99 168 infections in non-immune individuals; the numbers of hospitalisations were 3195 and 1976, respectively. After the first 3 months, natural immunity was associated with a 95% lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0·05 [95% CI 0·05-0·05] p<0·001) and an 87% (0·13 [0·11-0·16]; p<0·001) lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation for up to 20 months of follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 52 days (SD 38) in cohort 2, 639 individuals with one-dose hybrid immunity were registered with a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, compared with 1662 individuals with natural immunity (numbers of hospitalisations were eight and 113, respectively). One-dose hybrid immunity was associated with a 58% lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection (aHR 0·42 [95% CI 0·38-0·47]; p<0·001) than natural immunity up to the first 2 months, with evidence of attenuation thereafter up to 9 months (p<0·001) of follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 66 days (SD 53) in cohort 3, 438 individuals with two-dose hybrid immunity were registered as having had a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, compared with 808 individuals with natural immunity (numbers of hospitalisations were six and 40, respectively). Two-dose hybrid immunity was associated with a 66% lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection (aHR 0·34 [95% CI 0·31-0·39]; p<0·001) than natural immunity, with no significant attenuation up to 9 months (p=0·07). To prevent one reinfection in the natural immunity cohort during follow-up, 767 individuals needed to be vaccinated with two doses. Both one-dose (HR adjusted for age and baseline date 0·06 [95% CI 0·03-0·12]; p<0·001) and two-dose (HR adjusted for age and baseline date 0·10 [0·04-0·22]; p<0·001) hybrid immunity were associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation than natural immunity.
The risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and COVID-19 hospitalisation in individuals who have survived and recovered from a previous infection remained low for up to 20 months. Vaccination seemed to further decrease the risk of both outcomes for up to 9 months, although the differences in absolute numbers, especially in hospitalisations, were small. These findings suggest that if passports are used for societal restrictions, they should acknowledge either a previous infection or vaccination as proof of immunity, as opposed to vaccination only.
None.
支持曾感染过严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的个体接种新冠病毒疫苗的真实世界证据较少。我们旨在研究既往感染所带来的长期保护作用(自然免疫),以及自然免疫加疫苗接种(混合免疫)是否能提供额外保护。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们利用瑞典公共卫生局、国家卫生和福利委员会以及瑞典统计局管理的全国性登记数据,组建了三个队列。队列1包括具有自然免疫的未接种疫苗个体,这些个体在出生年份和性别上与基线时无自然免疫的未接种疫苗个体进行配对。队列2和队列3分别包括既往感染后接种一剂(单剂混合免疫)或两剂(两剂混合免疫)新冠病毒疫苗的个体,这些个体在出生年份和性别上与基线时具有自然免疫的个体进行配对。本研究的结局指标为2020年3月20日至2021年10月4日期间记录的SARS-CoV-2感染,以及2020年3月30日至2021年9月5日期间以新冠病毒病为主要诊断的住院治疗情况。
队列1由2039106名个体组成,队列2由962318名个体组成,队列3由567810名个体组成。在平均164天(标准差100)的随访期间,队列1中34090名具有自然免疫的个体被记录为再次感染SARS-CoV-2,而非免疫个体中有99168例感染;住院人数分别为3195例和1976例。在最初3个月后,自然免疫与SARS-CoV-2感染风险降低95%(调整后风险比[aHR]0.05[95%置信区间0.05 - 0.05];p<0.001)以及长达20个月随访期间新冠病毒病住院风险降低87%(0.13[0.11 - 0.16];p<0.001)相关。在队列2平均52天(标准差38)的随访期间,639名单剂混合免疫个体被记录为再次感染SARS-CoV-2,而具有自然免疫的个体有1662例(住院人数分别为8例和113例)。在随访的前2个月内,单剂混合免疫与SARS-CoV-2再次感染风险比自然免疫降低58%(aHR 0.42[95%置信区间0.38 - 0.47];p<0.001)相关,此后直至9个月随访期有衰减迹象(p<0.001)。在队列3平均66天(标准差53)的随访期间,438名两剂混合免疫个体被记录为再次感染SARS-CoV-2,而具有自然免疫的个体有808例(住院人数分别为6例和40例)。两剂混合免疫与SARS-CoV-2再次感染风险比自然免疫降低66%(aHR 0.34[95%置信区间0.31 - 0.39];p<0.001)相关,在长达9个月的随访期内无显著衰减(p = 0.07)。为预防随访期间自然免疫队列中的一例再次感染,需要767名个体接种两剂疫苗(单剂混合免疫(根据年龄和基线日期调整后的风险比0.06[95%置信区间0.03 - 0.12];p<0.001)和两剂混合免疫(根据年龄和基线日期调整后的风险比0.10[0.04 - 0.22];p<0.001)均与新冠病毒病住院风险低于自然免疫相关。
既往感染后存活并康复的个体再次感染SARS-CoV-2和因新冠病毒病住院的风险在长达20个月内仍较低。疫苗接种似乎在长达9个月的时间里进一步降低了这两种结局的风险,尽管绝对数字差异较小,尤其是住院人数方面。这些发现表明,如果使用通行证进行社会限制,应认可既往感染或疫苗接种作为免疫证明,而不仅仅是疫苗接种。
无。