• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用快速定量CRP检测法(ASDAS-Q)对轴性脊柱关节炎患者进行ASDAS验证:一项前瞻性多中心横断面研究。

Validation of the ASDAS with a quick quantitative CRP assay (ASDAS-Q) in patients with axial SpA: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Proft Fabian, Schally Julia, Brandt Henning Christian, Brandt-Juergens Jan, Rüdiger Burmester Gerd, Haibel Hildrun, Käding Henriette, Karberg Kirsten, Lüders Susanne, Muche Burkhard, Protopopov Mikhail, Rademacher Judith, Rios Rodriguez Valeria, Torgutalp Murat, Verba Maryna, Zinke Silke, Poddubnyy Denis

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology (including Nutrition Medicine), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin 12203, Germany.

Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology (including Nutrition Medicine), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Mar 30;14:1759720X221085951. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221085951. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1177/1759720X221085951
PMID:35368376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8972926/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to validate the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) based on a quick quantitative C-reactive protein (qCRP) assay (ASDAS-Q) in a multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA).

METHODS

Disease activity assessment was performed in prospectively recruited patients with axial SpA. Routine laboratory CRP was determined in the central laboratory of each study centre, while quick qCRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured locally. Consequently, ASDAS-CRP, ASDAS-Q using the qCRP and ASDAS-ESR were calculated. The absolute agreement on the disease activity category ascertainment was analysed with cross-tabulations and weighted Cohen's kappa. Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to analyse the criterion validity.

RESULTS

Overall, 251 axial SpA patients were included in the analysis. The mean qCRP value (6.34 ± 11.13 mg/l) was higher than that of routine laboratory CRP (5.26 ± 9.35 mg/l). The ICC for routine laboratory CRP qCRP was 0.985 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.972-0.991]. Comparing ASDAS-Q with ASDAS-CRP, 242 of 251 (96.4%) patients were assigned to the same disease activity categories with a weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.966 (95% CI: 0.943-0.988) and ICC of 0.997 (95% CI: 0.994-0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

ASDAS-Q showed an almost perfect agreement with ASDAS-CRP in the assignment to specific disease activity categories. Consequently, ASDAS-Q using the qCRP value can be applied as an accurate and quickly available alternative to ASDAS-CRP, thus facilitating the implementation of the treat-to-target concept in clinical trials and clinical routine.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是在一项针对中轴型脊柱关节炎(axial SpA)患者的多中心、前瞻性、横断面研究中,基于快速定量C反应蛋白(qCRP)检测方法验证强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)(ASDAS-Q)。

方法

对前瞻性招募的中轴型SpA患者进行疾病活动评估。每个研究中心的中央实验室测定常规实验室CRP,同时在当地测量快速qCRP和红细胞沉降率(ESR)。因此,计算了ASDAS-CRP、使用qCRP的ASDAS-Q和ASDAS-ESR。通过交叉表和加权Cohen's kappa分析疾病活动类别确定的绝对一致性。使用Bland-Altman图和组内相关系数(ICC)分析标准效度。

结果

总体而言,251例中轴型SpA患者纳入分析。qCRP的平均数值(6.34±11.13mg/l)高于常规实验室CRP(5.26±9.35mg/l)。常规实验室CRP与qCRP的ICC为0.985[95%置信区间(CI):0.972-0.991]。将ASDAS-Q与ASDAS-CRP进行比较,251例患者中有242例(96.4%)被归为相同的疾病活动类别,加权Cohen's kappa为0.966(95%CI:0.943-0.988),ICC为0.997(95%CI:0.994-0.999)。

结论

在特定疾病活动类别划分方面,ASDAS-Q与ASDAS-CRP显示出几乎完美的一致性。因此,使用qCRP值的ASDAS-Q可作为ASDAS-CRP的一种准确且快速可用的替代方法,从而有助于在临床试验和临床常规中实施达标治疗理念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b60/8972926/af3a4d60f0c9/10.1177_1759720X221085951-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b60/8972926/98c3e62b49af/10.1177_1759720X221085951-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b60/8972926/2926bda8a87d/10.1177_1759720X221085951-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b60/8972926/af3a4d60f0c9/10.1177_1759720X221085951-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b60/8972926/98c3e62b49af/10.1177_1759720X221085951-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b60/8972926/2926bda8a87d/10.1177_1759720X221085951-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b60/8972926/af3a4d60f0c9/10.1177_1759720X221085951-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the ASDAS with a quick quantitative CRP assay (ASDAS-Q) in patients with axial SpA: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.使用快速定量CRP检测法(ASDAS-Q)对轴性脊柱关节炎患者进行ASDAS验证:一项前瞻性多中心横断面研究。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Mar 30;14:1759720X221085951. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221085951. eCollection 2022.
2
Performance of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on a quick quantitative C-reactive protein assay in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.基于快速定量 C 反应蛋白检测的强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分在轴性脊柱关节炎患者中的表现。
Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Jan;87(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
3
Validation of the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) with a quick quantitative C-reactive protein assay (SDAI-Q) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study.类风湿关节炎患者中简化疾病活动指数(SDAI)与快速定量C反应蛋白检测法(SDAI-Q)的验证:一项前瞻性多中心横断面研究
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Aug 16;14:1759720X221114107. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221114107. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) with a quick quantitative C reactive protein assay (Q-DAPSA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.评估银屑病关节炎疾病活动指数(DAPSA)与快速定量 C 反应蛋白测定(Q-DAPSA)在银屑病关节炎患者中的应用:一项前瞻性多中心横断面研究。
RMD Open. 2022 Nov;8(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002626.
5
Construct validity and responsiveness of the simplified version of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (SASDAS) for the evaluation of disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis.强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度评分简化版(SASDAS)用于评估中轴型脊柱关节炎疾病活动度的结构效度和反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Aug 22;12:129. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0129-9.
6
Validity of the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with early spondyloarthritis from the Esperanza programme.ESPERANZA 方案中早期脊柱关节炎患者的强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度评分(ASDAS)的有效性。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1350-5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202976. Epub 2013 May 24.
7
Cut-Offs for Disease Activity States in Axial Spondyloarthritis With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Based on C-Reactive Protein and ASDAS Based on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate: Are They Interchangeable?基于 C 反应蛋白的强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)和基于红细胞沉降率的 ASDAS 在中轴型脊柱关节炎的疾病活动状态截断值:两者是否可互换?
J Rheumatol. 2024 Jul 1;51(7):673-677. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-1217.
8
Discriminant validity of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: a cohort study.强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)在非放射学轴性脊柱关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者中的判别效度:一项队列研究
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jun;35(6):981-9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3168-y. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
9
The Discriminative Values of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, C-Reactive Protein, and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Spondyloarthritis-Related Axial Arthritis.Bath 强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数、强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分、C 反应蛋白和红细胞沉降率在脊柱关节炎相关轴性关节炎中的鉴别价值。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;23(5):267-272. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000522.
10
Is there any gender-specific difference in the cut-off values of ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score in patients with axial spondyloarthritis?在轴性脊柱关节炎患者中,强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分的临界值是否存在性别差异?
Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;20(9):1201-1211. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12885. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index tools in assessment of axial spondyloarthritis activity.强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分与巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数工具在评估轴性脊柱关节炎活动度中的比较。
Reumatologia. 2024;62(1):64-69. doi: 10.5114/reum/185429. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
Axial Spondyloarthritis Treatment Recommendations and Disease Activity Monitoring in Clinical Practice: Results of an Online Survey.轴向型脊柱关节炎治疗推荐和临床实践中的疾病活动监测:一项在线调查的结果。
J Rheumatol. 2024 May 1;51(5):472-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0894.
3
Evaluation of the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) with a quick quantitative C reactive protein assay (Q-DAPSA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial.靶向治疗紧密控制策略在中轴型脊柱关节炎中的疗效:开放标签、实用、群组随机 TICOSPA 试验的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov;80(11):1436-1444. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219585. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
Treat-to-target strategy with secukinumab as a first-line biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug compared to standard-of-care treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: protocol for a randomised open-label phase III study, AScalate.以司库奇尤单抗为一线生物靶向治疗药物的达标治疗策略与标准治疗相比用于治疗活动性中轴型脊柱关节炎患者的随机、开放标签、III 期研究方案(AScalate 研究)
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 30;10(9):e039059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039059.
3
评估银屑病关节炎疾病活动指数(DAPSA)与快速定量 C 反应蛋白测定(Q-DAPSA)在银屑病关节炎患者中的应用:一项前瞻性多中心横断面研究。
RMD Open. 2022 Nov;8(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002626.
4
Validation of the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) with a quick quantitative C-reactive protein assay (SDAI-Q) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study.类风湿关节炎患者中简化疾病活动指数(SDAI)与快速定量C反应蛋白检测法(SDAI-Q)的验证:一项前瞻性多中心横断面研究
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022 Aug 16;14:1759720X221114107. doi: 10.1177/1759720X221114107. eCollection 2022.
An update on serum biomarkers to assess axial spondyloarthritis and to guide treatment decision.评估轴性脊柱关节炎及指导治疗决策的血清生物标志物的最新进展。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020 Jun 24;12:1759720X20934277. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20934277. eCollection 2020.
4
Development and validation of an alternative ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score when patient global assessment is unavailable.在无法获得患者总体评估时,开发和验证替代的强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Feb 1;60(2):638-648. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa241.
5
How to calculate the ASDAS based on C-reactive protein without individual questions from the BASDAI: the BASDAI-based ASDAS formula.如何基于 C 反应蛋白计算 BASDAI 中无个体问题的 ASDAS:基于 BASDAI 的 ASDAS 公式。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jul 1;59(7):1545-1549. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez480.
6
Development of ASAS quality standards to improve the quality of health and care services for patients with axial spondyloarthritis.制定 ASAS 质量标准,以提高患有中轴型脊柱关节炎患者的健康和医疗服务质量。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):193-201. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216034. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
2019 Update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.2019 年美国风湿病学会/脊柱关节炎协会/脊柱关节炎研究和治疗网络关于治疗强直性脊柱炎和非放射学中轴型脊柱关节炎的建议更新。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;71(10):1599-1613. doi: 10.1002/art.41042. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
8
Performance of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on a quick quantitative C-reactive protein assay in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.基于快速定量 C 反应蛋白检测的强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分在轴性脊柱关节炎患者中的表现。
Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Jan;87(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
9
Determinants of diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: an analysis based on linked claims and patient-reported survey data.基于关联索赔和患者报告调查数据的中轴型脊柱关节炎诊断延迟的决定因素分析。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Sep 1;58(9):1634-1638. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez090.
10
Update on the epidemiology, risk factors, and disease outcomes of axial spondyloarthritis.轴性脊柱关节炎的流行病学、危险因素和疾病转归的最新研究进展。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Apr;32(2):241-253. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Nov 16.