• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院特征对脑卒中患者医院转归目的地的影响。

Influence of Hospital Characteristics on Hospital Transfer Destinations for Patients With Stroke.

机构信息

Departments of Emergency Medicine (K.S.Z.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Harvard Medical School (K.S.Z., L.H.S.), Boston, MA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 May;15(5):e008269. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008269. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008269
PMID:35369714
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with stroke are frequently transferred between hospitals. This may have implications on the quality of care received by patients; however, it is not well understood how the characteristics of sending and receiving hospitals affect the likelihood of a transfer event. Our objective was to identify hospital characteristics associated with sending and receiving patients with stroke.

METHODS

Using a comprehensive statewide administrative dataset, including all 78 Massachusetts hospitals, we identified all transfers of patients with ischemic stroke between October 2007 and September 2015 for this observational study. Hospital variables included reputation (US News and World Report ranking), capability (stroke center status, annual stroke volume, and trauma center designation), and institutional affiliation. We included network variables to control for the structure of hospital-to-hospital transfers. We used relational event modeling to account for complex temporal and relational dependencies associated with transfers. This method decomposes a series of patient transfers into a sequence of decisions characterized by transfer initiations and destinations, modeling them using a discrete-choice framework.

RESULTS

Among 73 114 ischemic stroke admissions there were 7189 (9.8%) transfers during the study period. After accounting for travel time between hospitals and structural network characteristics, factors associated with increased likelihood of being a receiving hospital (in descending order of relative effect size) included shared hospital affiliation (5.8× higher), teaching hospital status (4.2× higher), stroke center status (4.3× and 3.8× higher when of the same or higher status), and hospitals of the same or higher reputational ranking (1.5× higher).

CONCLUSIONS

After accounting for distance and structural network characteristics, in descending order of importance, shared hospital affiliation, hospital capabilities, and hospital reputation were important factor in determining transfer destination of patients with stroke. This study provides a starting point for future research exploring how relational coordination between hospitals may ensure optimized allocation of patients with stroke for maximal patient benefit.

摘要

背景

脑卒中患者经常在医院之间转移。这可能会对患者接受的护理质量产生影响,但目前尚不清楚发送和接收医院的特征如何影响转移事件的可能性。我们的目的是确定与发送和接收脑卒中患者相关的医院特征。

方法

使用包括马萨诸塞州所有 78 家医院在内的全面全州行政数据集,我们对 2007 年 10 月至 2015 年 9 月期间所有缺血性脑卒中患者的转移进行了这项观察性研究。医院变量包括声誉(《美国新闻与世界报道》排名)、能力(卒中中心地位、年度脑卒中量和创伤中心指定)和机构隶属关系。我们包括网络变量来控制医院间转移的结构。我们使用关系事件建模来解释与转移相关的复杂时间和关系依赖性。该方法将一系列患者转移分解为一系列以转移发起和目的地为特征的决策,使用离散选择框架对其进行建模。

结果

在 73114 例缺血性脑卒中入院患者中,研究期间有 7189 例(9.8%)发生转移。在考虑到医院之间的旅行时间和结构网络特征后,与成为接收医院的可能性增加相关的因素(按相对效应大小降序排列)包括共享医院隶属关系(高 5.8 倍)、教学医院地位(高 4.2 倍)、卒中中心地位(同等或更高地位时高 4.3 倍和 3.8 倍)和同等或更高声誉排名的医院(高 1.5 倍)。

结论

在考虑到距离和结构网络特征后,按重要性降序排列,共享医院隶属关系、医院能力和医院声誉是确定脑卒中患者转移目的地的重要因素。本研究为未来探索医院之间的关系协调如何确保优化脑卒中患者的分配以实现最大患者获益的研究提供了起点。

相似文献

1
Influence of Hospital Characteristics on Hospital Transfer Destinations for Patients With Stroke.医院特征对脑卒中患者医院转归目的地的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 May;15(5):e008269. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008269. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Hospital Factors Associated With Interhospital Transfer Destination for Stroke in the Northeast United States.美国东北部与卒中患者院内转院目的地相关的医院因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e011575. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011575. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
3
The "Network Effect" on Interfacility Transfers Among Regional Stroke Certified Hospitals.区域性脑卒中认证医院之间的设施间转移的“网络效应”。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Nov;30(11):106056. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106056. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
4
Association of Hospital Telestroke Adoption With Changes in Initial Hospital Presentation and Transfers Among Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attacks.医院远程卒中治疗的采用与卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者初始住院表现和转院变化的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126612. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26612.
5
Trends in Interhospital Transfers and Mechanical Thrombectomy for United States Acute Ischemic Stroke Inpatients.美国急性缺血性中风住院患者的院间转运及机械取栓治疗趋势
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):980-987. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
The Patterns and Outcomes of Inter-Hospital Transfer Among Medicare Patients with Ischemic Stroke.医疗保险患者缺血性脑卒中患者的院内转院模式和结局。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105331. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105331. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Ischemic Stroke Transfer Patterns in the Northeast United States.美国东北部缺血性中风的转运模式。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Feb;28(2):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.09.048. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
8
Reperfusion Therapy Frequency and Outcomes in Mild Ischemic Stroke in the United States.美国轻度缺血性卒中的再灌注治疗频率和结局。
Stroke. 2020 Nov;51(11):3241-3249. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030898. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Outcomes of Hospital Transfers for Pediatric Abdominal Pain and Appendicitis.儿科腹痛和阑尾炎患者的医院转归。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183249. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3249.
10
Total Transfer Time for Ground vs. Air Transport for Interhospital and Scene Transfers of Acute Stroke Patients.院内和院外急性脑卒中患者地面与空中转运的总转运时间。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jun;30(6):105704. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105704. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Hospital Affiliation on Hospital Transfer Practices.医院附属关系对医院转诊行为的影响。
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jul 23;18:11786329251357378. doi: 10.1177/11786329251357378. eCollection 2025.
2
The Association of the Distance to the Hospital, Hospital Reputation, and Hospitalization Outcomes Among Patients with Stroke in China.中国卒中患者距离医院的远近、医院声誉与住院结局的关联
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 28;13(11):1276. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111276.
3
A Scoping Review of Multilevel Patient-Sharing Network Measures in Health Services Research.
卫生服务研究中多层次患者共享网络措施的范围综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Jun;82(3):203-224. doi: 10.1177/10775587241304140. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
4
Policy Spotlight Effects on Critical Time-Sensitive Diseases: Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study on Taiwan's Hospital Emergency Capability Categorization Policy.政策聚焦对关键时间敏感型疾病的影响:台湾医院急诊能力分类政策的全国性回顾性队列研究
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Mar 25;14:e54651. doi: 10.2196/54651.
5
Differences in Interfacility Transfer from Emergency Department and Inpatient Services for Inpatient Neurologic Care.急诊科与住院服务之间关于住院神经科护理的机构间转诊差异。
Neurohospitalist. 2024 Oct;14(4):406-412. doi: 10.1177/19418744241273205. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
6
Insurance-Based Disparities in Stroke Center Access in California: A Network Science Approach.基于保险的加利福尼亚州卒中中心准入差异:网络科学方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Oct;16(10):e009868. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009868. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
7
Prehospital Stroke Care Part 1: Emergency Medical Services and the Stroke Systems of Care.院前卒中护理第一部分:急诊医疗服务和卒中护理系统。
Stroke. 2023 Apr;54(4):1138-1147. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039586. Epub 2022 Nov 29.