Parsons Kelly, Barling David
University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 0HB Herts UK.
Food Secur. 2022;14(4):1027-1043. doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01280-1. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
The impact of the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic and the response of government and non-government actors, from February-September 2020, offers critical insights into the current state of England's food policy processes and operations, and in particular the coordination of national food policy approaches. This study aims to clarify and solidify the discourse around food policy coordination by differentiating between coordination of the activities of government, and coordination of such policy activities with higher-level strategic goals, such as those associated with a healthy and sustainable food system. This framework is applied to the case study based on documentary analysis. In detailing the evidence of coordination in the response, including examples of cross-government working, and collaboration across the public, private and third sectors, the findings illustrate the breadth of actors which constituted the policy and governance response. These included public policymakers in national and local governments, and from a range of different government departments; private sector food businesses; and third sector organisations. There was a high level of routine coordination, but also instances of disconnection and delay. A lack of strategic coordination provides an explanatory device for several instances of disconnection and incoherence, including interventions which failed to prioritise nutrition-related health, and the working conditions of those employed in the food sector. The routine-strategic distinction can be deployed to inform discussions on the types of policy coordination mechanisms, such as cross-cutting taskforces or bodies, which might be instituted to support connected working on food.
2020年2月至9月期间,新冠疫情第一波的影响以及政府和非政府行为体的应对措施,为洞察英国食品政策流程与运作的现状,尤其是国家食品政策方法的协调情况,提供了关键见解。本研究旨在通过区分政府活动的协调以及此类政策活动与更高层次战略目标(如与健康和可持续食品系统相关的目标)的协调,来厘清并巩固围绕食品政策协调的论述。该框架应用于基于文献分析的案例研究。在详细阐述应对措施中的协调证据,包括跨部门合作以及公共、私营和第三部门之间的协作实例时,研究结果展示了构成政策和治理应对措施的行为体范围之广。这些行为体包括国家和地方政府以及一系列不同政府部门的公共政策制定者;私营部门食品企业;以及第三部门组织。存在高度的日常协调,但也有脱节和延误的情况。缺乏战略协调为若干脱节和不连贯的情况提供了解释,包括未能将与营养相关的健康以及食品部门从业人员的工作条件列为优先事项的干预措施。日常与战略的区分可用于为关于政策协调机制类型(如跨部门特别工作组或机构)的讨论提供参考,这些机制可能会设立以支持食品领域的协同工作。