Bäck Annika, Modin Asper Michaela, Madsen Stephanie, Eriksson Leif, Costea Veronica Aurelia, Hasson Henna, Bergström Anna
Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Unit for Implementation and Evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 25;15(3):e092525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092525.
Cross-sector collaboration has been encouraged to improve population health. Both local authorities and civil society organisations impact population health, but less is known about the actual process of collaboration is done. This scoping review aims to explore how local authorities and civil society organisations collaborate with the ambition to improve population health.
This scoping review was informed by the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute, and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews.
Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL and Sociological Abstracts were searched from inception to September 2022.
We included peer-reviewed empirical studies that describe the initiation, execution or sustainment of collaboration for health between local authorities and civil society organisations.
Two independent reviewers extracted data, which was summarised and analysed using inductive content analysis.
In the 79 included articles, collaborations between local authorities and civil society organisations entailed many different aspects, from exchanging knowledge, allocating resources, providing different types of support or human resources, training, forming different working groups, agreements and working plans to gathering data for needs analysis or evaluation. Few articles described how the collaboration had been initiated or sustained. Initiation was done through advocacy, needs assessments, making a request, creating a workgroup and conducting a pilot study. Sustainment efforts were continuous meetings, documents and tools, funding, and different plans and work structures. There were often additional actors involved in the collaborations. Information about study design was often not described in a clear and comparative manner.
There is a need for more research on the details of initiating, executing and sustaining collaborations for health between local authorities and civil society organisations. Knowledge from this scoping review can be used to inform the planning of future collaborations between local authorities and civil society organisations.
鼓励跨部门合作以改善人群健康。地方当局和民间社会组织都会对人群健康产生影响,但对于合作的实际开展过程却知之甚少。本综述旨在探讨地方当局和民间社会组织如何以改善人群健康为目标开展合作。
本综述遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南,并按照系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述的首选报告项目进行报告。
检索了Medline、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)和社会学文摘数据库,检索时间从建库至2022年9月。
我们纳入了同行评审的实证研究,这些研究描述了地方当局和民间社会组织之间健康合作的启动、执行或维持情况。
两名独立评审员提取数据,并采用归纳性内容分析法进行总结和分析。
在纳入的79篇文章中,地方当局和民间社会组织之间的合作涉及许多不同方面,包括知识交流、资源分配、提供不同类型的支持或人力资源、培训、组建不同的工作组、达成协议和制定工作计划,以及收集需求分析或评估数据。很少有文章描述合作是如何启动或维持的。合作通过宣传、需求评估、提出请求、创建工作组和开展试点研究来启动。维持合作的努力包括持续会议、文件和工具、资金以及不同的计划和工作结构。合作中往往还涉及其他行为主体。关于研究设计的信息通常没有以清晰和可比的方式进行描述。
需要对地方当局和民间社会组织之间健康合作的启动、执行和维持细节进行更多研究。本综述的知识可用于为地方当局和民间社会组织未来的合作规划提供参考。