• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体对活体肾脏捐献自我推荐模式的影响。

Impact of Social Media on Self-Referral Patterns for Living Kidney Donation.

机构信息

Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Kidney360. 2020 Oct 30;1(12):1419-1425. doi: 10.34067/KID.0003212020. eCollection 2020 Dec 31.

DOI:10.34067/KID.0003212020
PMID:35372891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8815533/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the organ-shortage crisis continues to worsen, many patients in need of a kidney transplant have turned to social media to find a living donor. The effect of social media on living kidney donation is not known. The goal of this study is to investigate the influence of social media on those interested in donating a kidney.

METHODS

Self-referrals for living kidney donation from December 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, race, and relationship of individuals petitioned through social media (SM) were compared with those petitioned through verbal communication (VC). Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests, with z tests of column proportions, and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 7817 individuals (53% SM, 36% VC, and 10% other) were self-referred for living kidney donation. The analysis sample included 6737 adults petitioned through SM (=3999) or VC (=2738). Half (=3933) of the individuals reported an altruistic relationship, and 94% of these respondents were petitioned through SM. Although univariate analyses indicated that SM respondents were younger, more likely female, more likely White, and more likely to have directed altruistic intent than those petitioned through VC (all <0.05), multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that only decreased age, female sex, and relationship were significantly related to likelihood of SM use (all <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SM to petition living kidney donors is prevalent and accounts for a greater proportion of respondents compared with VC. SM respondents tend to be younger, female, and altruistic compared with VC. Directed altruistic interest in kidney donation is almost exclusively generated through SM.

摘要

背景

随着器官短缺危机的持续恶化,许多需要肾移植的患者已经转向社交媒体寻找活体捐献者。社交媒体对活体肾脏捐献的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查社交媒体对有兴趣捐献肾脏的人的影响。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 12 月至 2019 年 3 月期间的活体肾脏捐献自我推荐。通过社交媒体(SM)和口头交流(VC)申请的个体的年龄、性别、种族和关系进行比较。采用卡方检验、列比例 z 检验和多变量逻辑回归进行数据分析。

结果

共有 7817 人(53%SM、36%VC 和 10%其他)自我推荐接受活体肾脏捐献。分析样本包括通过 SM(=3999)或 VC(=2738)申请的 6737 名成年人。一半(=3933)的人报告了利他关系,其中 94%的人是通过 SM 申请的。虽然单变量分析表明,SM 受访者更年轻、更可能是女性、更可能是白人、更可能有明确的利他意向,但多变量逻辑回归表明,只有年龄减小、女性和关系与 SM 的使用显著相关(均<0.001)。

结论

使用 SM 来请求活体肾脏捐献者很普遍,并且与 VC 相比,SM 的回复者比例更高。与 VC 相比,SM 受访者往往更年轻、女性化且更利他。对肾脏捐献的定向利他兴趣几乎完全通过 SM 产生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a6/8815533/9084a2a6be1b/KID.0003212020absf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a6/8815533/9084a2a6be1b/KID.0003212020absf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a6/8815533/9084a2a6be1b/KID.0003212020absf1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Social Media on Self-Referral Patterns for Living Kidney Donation.社交媒体对活体肾脏捐献自我推荐模式的影响。
Kidney360. 2020 Oct 30;1(12):1419-1425. doi: 10.34067/KID.0003212020. eCollection 2020 Dec 31.
2
Empathy, social media, and directed altruistic living organ donation.同理心、社交媒体与定向利他性活体器官捐赠。
Bioethics. 2018 Jun;32(5):289-297. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12438. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
Social Media Use Among Living Kidney Donors and Recipients: Survey on Current Practice and Potential.活体肾捐赠者和接受者对社交媒体的使用:当前实践与潜力调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 20;18(12):e328. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6176.
4
The non-directed living kidney donor: Why donate to strangers?非定向活体肾捐赠者:为何要捐赠给陌生人?
J Ren Care. 2019 Jun;45(2):102-110. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12267. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Have we reached the limits in altruistic kidney donation?利他性肾捐献是否已达极限?
Transpl Int. 2021 Jul;34(7):1187-1197. doi: 10.1111/tri.13921. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
6
Attitude of kidney patients on the transplant waiting list toward related-living donation. A reason for the scarce development of living donation in Spain.等待肾移植患者对亲属活体捐赠的态度。西班牙活体捐赠发展不足的一个原因。
Clin Transplant. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6):719-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00541.x.
7
Attitude of personnel in hospital cadaveric organ transplant-related units faced with living kidney donation in a hospital with a living kidney donor transplantation program.在设有活体肾移植项目的医院中,医院尸体器官移植相关科室人员对活体肾捐赠的态度。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;108(1):c75-82. doi: 10.1159/000112955. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
8
The Role of Media in Non-Directed (Altruistic) Living Kidney Donation.媒体在非定向(利他性)活体肾脏捐赠中的作用。
Health Commun. 2019 Feb;34(2):259-267. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1405480. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
9
Responding to offers of altruistic living unrelated kidney donation by group associations: an ethical analysis.团体协会对利他性活体非亲属肾捐赠提议的回应:一项伦理学分析。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2008 Jul;22(3):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 May 13.
10
Altruistic donation through the Alliance for Paired Donation.通过配对捐赠联盟进行利他性捐赠。
Clin Transpl. 2009:235-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Classification of Living Kidney Donation Experiences on Reddit and Understanding the Sensitivity of ChatGPT to Prompt Engineering: Content Analysis.探究Reddit上活体肾捐赠经历的分类并理解ChatGPT对提示工程的敏感性:内容分析
JMIR AI. 2025 Feb 7;4:e57319. doi: 10.2196/57319.
2
KEeP ACTIVe Club Study: Kidney Transplant Recipients' Experiences of a Physical Activity and Social Interaction Virtual Group.保持活跃俱乐部研究:肾移植受者参与体育活动和社交互动虚拟小组的体验
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024 Feb 8;11:20543581241229254. doi: 10.1177/20543581241229254. eCollection 2024.
3
Social Media and Organ Donation: Pros and Cons.

本文引用的文献

1
OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Kidney.OPTN/SRTR 2018 年度数据报告:肾脏。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Jan;20 Suppl s1:20-130. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15672.
2
OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Introduction.器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络2018年度数据报告:引言。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Jan;20 Suppl s1:11-19. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15671.
3
Understanding the sex disparity in living kidney donation.了解活体肾捐赠中的性别差异。
社交媒体与器官捐赠:利弊
Indian J Nephrol. 2023 Jan-Feb;33(1):4-11. doi: 10.4103/ijn.ijn_158_22. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
4
Utilizing Social Media to Identify Potential Living Donors: Learning from US Living Donor Programs.利用社交媒体识别潜在活体捐赠者:借鉴美国活体捐赠者项目的经验
Curr Transplant Rep. 2022;9(4):318-327. doi: 10.1007/s40472-022-00382-1. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
5
Self-Referral Patterns of Living Kidney Donors Social Media: Examining an Expanding Platform.活体肾捐献者的自我推荐模式 社交媒体:审视一个不断扩展的平台。
Kidney360. 2020 Dec 31;1(12):1337-1338. doi: 10.34067/KID.0005732020.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Oct;24(5):999-1004. doi: 10.1111/jep.13015. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
4
Empathy, social media, and directed altruistic living organ donation.同理心、社交媒体与定向利他性活体器官捐赠。
Bioethics. 2018 Jun;32(5):289-297. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12438. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
Shipping living donor kidneys and transplant recipient outcomes.活体供肾移植与受者结局。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Mar;18(3):632-641. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14597. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Social media in medicine: a game changer?
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):1806-1808. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx276.
7
Implementation of telehealth is associated with improved timeliness to kidney transplant waitlist evaluation.远程医疗的实施与提高肾移植候补评估的及时性相关。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Aug;24(7):485-491. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17715526. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
8
Social Media Use Among Living Kidney Donors and Recipients: Survey on Current Practice and Potential.活体肾捐赠者和接受者对社交媒体的使用:当前实践与潜力调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 20;18(12):e328. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6176.
9
A Smartphone App for Increasing Live Organ Donation.智能手机应用程序提高活体器官捐献
Am J Transplant. 2016 Dec;16(12):3548-3553. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13961. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
10
Quality of Life After Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Study.肾移植后的生活质量:一项前瞻性研究。
Transplant Proc. 2016 Jan-Feb;48(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.058.