Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Jul;24(7):1310-1318. doi: 10.1111/dom.14705. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
To determine whether achieving early glycaemic control, and any subsequent glycaemic variability, was associated with any change in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
A retrospective cohort analysis from the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre database-a large, English primary care network-was conducted. We followed newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes, on or after 1 January 2005, aged 25 years or older at diagnosis, with HbA1c measurements at both diagnosis and after 1 year, plus five or more measurements of HbA1c thereafter. Three glycaemic bands were created: groups A (HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol [<7.5%]), B (HbA1c ≥ 58 to 75 mmol/mol [7.5%-9.0%]) and C (HbA1c ≥ 75 mmol/mol [≥9.0%]). Movement between bands was determined from diagnosis to 1 year. Additionally, for data after the first 12 months, a glycaemic variability score was calculated from the number of successive HbA1c readings differing by 0.5% or higher (≥5.5 mmol/mol). Risk of MACE from 1 year postdiagnosis was assessed using time-varying Cox proportional hazards models, which included the first-year transition and the glycaemic variability score.
From 26 180 patients, there were 2300 MACE. Compared with group A->A transition over 1 year, those with C->A transition had a reduced risk of MACE (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94; P = .014), whereas group C->C had HR 1.21 (0.81-1.81; P = .34). Compared with the lowest glycaemic variability score, the greatest variability increased the risk of MACE (HR 1.51; 1.11-2.06; P = .0096).
Early control of HbA1c improved cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes, although subsequent glycaemic variability had a negative effect on an individual's risk.
确定早期血糖控制以及随后的血糖变异性是否与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险的变化有关。
对牛津-皇家全科医师学院研究和监测中心数据库中的一个大型英国初级保健网络中的回顾性队列分析进行了研究。我们对 2005 年 1 月 1 日后诊断出的 25 岁或以上、HbA1c 在诊断时和 1 年后进行了测量的 2 型糖尿病新发病例进行了随访,且此后至少有 5 次 HbA1c 测量值。创建了三个血糖带:A 组(HbA1c<58mmol/mol [<7.5%])、B 组(HbA1c≥58 至 75mmol/mol [7.5%-9.0%])和 C 组(HbA1c≥75mmol/mol [≥9.0%])。从诊断到 1 年确定了带间的移动。此外,对于第 12 个月之后的数据,从连续 HbA1c 读数相差 0.5%或更高(≥5.5mmol/mol)的数量计算了血糖变异性评分。使用时变 Cox 比例风险模型评估从诊断后 1 年开始的 MACE 风险,该模型包括第 1 年的转移和血糖变异性评分。
在 26180 名患者中,有 2300 例发生 MACE。与 A 组 1 年内 A->A 转移相比,C->A 转移的 MACE 风险降低(HR 0.75;95%CI 0.60-0.94;P=0.014),而 C->C 组的 HR 为 1.21(0.81-1.81;P=0.34)。与最低血糖变异性评分相比,最大变异性增加了 MACE 的风险(HR 1.51;1.11-2.06;P=0.0096)。
2 型糖尿病患者早期控制 HbA1c 可改善心血管结局,但随后的血糖变异性对个体风险有负面影响。