Institute of Health and Wellbeing, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR), Mwanza Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Apr 4;16(4):e0010298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010298. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) such as soil transmitted helminths (STH) and human rabies represent a significant burden to health in East Africa. Control and elimination remains extremely challenging, particularly in remote communities. Novel approaches, such as One Health based integrated interventions, are gaining prominence, yet there is more to be learned about the ways in which social determinants affect such programmes.
In 2015 a mixed method qualitative study was conducted in northern Tanzania to determine community perceptions towards integrated delivery of two distinct healthcare interventions: treatment of children for STH and dog vaccination for rabies. In order to assess the effectiveness of the integrated approach, villages were randomly allocated to one of three intervention arms: i) Arm A received integrated mass drug administration (MDA) for STH and mass dog rabies vaccination (MDRV); ii) Arm B received MDA only; iii) Arm C received MDRV only.
Integrated interventions were looked upon favourably by communities with respondents in all arms stating that they were more likely to either get their dogs vaccinated if child deworming was delivered at the same time and vice versa. Participants appreciated integrated interventions, due to time and cost savings and increased access to essential health care. Analysis of qualitative data allowed deeper exploration of responses, revealing why people appreciated these benefits as well as constraints and barriers to participation in integrated programmes.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: An interdisciplinary One Health approach that incorporates qualitative social science can provide key insights into complex local perceptions for integrated health service delivery for STH and human rabies. This includes providing insights into how interventions can be improved while acknowledging and addressing critical issues around awareness, participation and underlying health disparities in remote pastoralist communities.
被忽视的热带病(NTDs),如土壤传播的蠕虫(STH)和人类狂犬病,对东非的健康构成了重大负担。控制和消除这些疾病仍然极具挑战性,尤其是在偏远社区。新方法,如基于“同一健康”的综合干预措施,正日益受到关注,但我们还需要更多地了解社会决定因素如何影响这些项目。
2015 年,在坦桑尼亚北部进行了一项混合方法定性研究,以确定社区对两种不同医疗干预措施综合提供的看法:儿童治疗土壤传播蠕虫和狗狂犬病疫苗接种。为了评估综合方法的有效性,村庄被随机分配到三个干预组之一:i)组 A 接受 STH 的综合大规模药物治疗(MDA)和大规模狗狂犬病疫苗接种(MDRV);ii)组 B 仅接受 MDA;iii)组 C 仅接受 MDRV。
社区对综合干预措施表示欢迎,所有组的受访者都表示,如果同时进行儿童驱虫治疗,他们更有可能为狗接种疫苗,反之亦然。参与者赞赏综合干预措施,因为它们节省了时间和成本,并且增加了获得基本医疗保健的机会。对定性数据的分析允许更深入地探讨反应,揭示了为什么人们赞赏这些好处,以及参与综合项目的限制和障碍。
结论/意义:跨学科的“同一健康”方法,纳入定性社会科学,可以为 STH 和人类狂犬病的综合卫生服务提供关键的当地复杂看法。这包括提供有关如何改进干预措施的见解,同时承认和解决偏远牧民社区中关于意识、参与和潜在健康差距的关键问题。