• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立突发公共卫生事件无预警演练模式评估体系。

Establishment of a no-notice drill mode evaluation system for public health emergencies.

机构信息

Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.

Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0266093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266093. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0266093
PMID:35377910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8979443/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

At present, there are some no-notice drill mode evaluation systems for public health emergencies in Chinese hospitals, which are the subjects of assessment in this study. However, there is a lack of CDC. This study builds a set of no-notice drill mode evaluation systems for public health emergencies that involve the CDC.

METHODS

The indexes for these systems were based on the performance of two no-notice drills for public health emergencies in Guangdong Province. Twenty experts were invited to screen the indicators during two rounds of the Delphi method to determine the weight of first- and second-level indexes through the analytic hierarchy process, and the weight of the third-level index was calculated using the percentage method.

RESULTS

After two rounds of expert consultation, we obtained four first-level indicators, twenty-six second-level indicators and eighty-six third-level indicators. According to the weight calculated by analytic hierarchy process, the weights of the first-level indicators are emergency preparation (0.2775), verification and consultation regarding an epidemic situation (0.165), field investigation and control (0.3925) and summary report (0.165). Sensitivity analysis shows that the stability of the index is good.

CONCLUSION

The no-notice drill mode evaluation system for public health emergencies constructed in this study can be applied to public health departments such as the CDC. Through promotion, it can provide a scientific basis for epidemiological investigation assessment.

摘要

目的

目前国内医院对于突发公共卫生事件的无脚本演练模式评价体系多为自行设定的课题,缺乏疾控中心的参与。本研究构建了一套包含疾控中心参与的突发公共卫生事件无脚本演练模式评价体系。

方法

本研究指标体系来源于广东省两轮突发公共卫生事件无脚本演练的表现,通过两轮德尔菲法邀请 20 位专家对指标进行筛选,采用层次分析法确定一、二级指标权重,三级指标权重采用百分权重法计算。

结果

经过两轮专家咨询,得出了 4 个一级指标、26 个二级指标和 86 个三级指标。根据层次分析法计算的权重,一级指标的权重分别为应急准备(0.2775)、疫情核实与咨询(0.165)、现场调查与控制(0.3925)和总结报告(0.165)。敏感性分析表明,该指标稳定性良好。

结论

本研究构建的突发公共卫生事件无脚本演练模式评价体系可应用于疾控中心等公共卫生部门,通过推广可为流行病学调查评估提供科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6789/8979443/f296db237f11/pone.0266093.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6789/8979443/f296db237f11/pone.0266093.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6789/8979443/f296db237f11/pone.0266093.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishment of a no-notice drill mode evaluation system for public health emergencies.建立突发公共卫生事件无预警演练模式评估体系。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0266093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266093. eCollection 2022.
2
[Application of Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to construct the evaluation index system of healthy enterprises].德尔菲法与层次分析法在构建健康企业评价指标体系中的应用
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 20;42(2):112-117. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20221201-00571.
3
[Construction of an evaluation index system for the capability of comprehensive control of mountain - type zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis based on the One Health concept].基于“同一健康”理念构建山区型人兽共患内脏利什曼病综合防控能力评价指标体系
Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 2;35(6):545-556. doi: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2023176.
4
Constructing a Competency Training Index System in Public Health Emergencies for Community Nurses.构建社区护士公共卫生应急能力培训指标体系
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;42(1):349-362. doi: 10.1111/phn.13448. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
5
Establishing quality evaluation system of nursing management in fever clinics: A Delphi method.建立发热门诊护理管理质量评价体系:德尔菲法。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Nov;29(8):2542-2556. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13408. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
6
[Establishment of evaluation system on food safety management capacity for food production enterprises by Delphi method].[运用德尔菲法建立食品生产企业食品安全管理能力评价体系]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Apr 28;44(4):437-443. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.04.015.
7
How to establishing an indicators framework for evaluating the performances in primary TB control institutions under the new TB control model? Based on a Delphi study conducted in Guangxi, China.如何建立新结核病控制模式下基层结核病防治机构绩效评估指标体系?基于在中国广西开展的德尔菲研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;22(1):2431. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14865-4.
8
Establishment and Application of an Index System for the Risk of Drug Shortages in China: Based on Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process.建立和应用中国药品短缺风险指标体系:基于德尔菲法和层次分析法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2860-2868. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6360. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
9
Developing online medical service quality indicators in China from the perspective of online and offline integration: a modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process study.从线上线下融合的角度出发,开发中国在线医疗服务质量指标:一项修正德尔菲-层次分析法研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Jun 16;35(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad038.
10
Developing medical record-based, healthcare quality indicators for psychiatric hospitals in China: a modified Delphi-Analytic Hierarchy Process study.开发中国精神科医院基于病历的医疗质量指标:改良德尔菲-层次分析法研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Dec 31;31(10):733-740. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz005.

本文引用的文献

1
Combination of fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques in land suitability assessment for wheat () cultivation.模糊层次分析法与地理信息系统技术相结合在小麦种植土地适宜性评价中的应用
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Apr;29(4):2634-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.050. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
SARS-CoV-2 aerosol risk models for the Airplane Seating Assignment Problem.用于飞机座位分配问题的新型冠状病毒气溶胶风险模型。
J Air Transp Manag. 2022 Mar;99:102175. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102175. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
3
Preparedness for a 'no-notice' mass-casualty incident: a nuclear detonation scenario.
应对“无预警”大批伤员事件的准备工作:核爆炸场景。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2022;98(5):873-877. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2021.2013573. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Research on Evaluation of Green Smart Building Based on Improved AHP-FCE Method.基于改进 AHP-FCE 方法的绿色智能建筑评价研究。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Nov 26;2021:5485671. doi: 10.1155/2021/5485671. eCollection 2021.
5
Recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of long COVID: a Delphi study.长新冠的识别、诊断和管理建议:德尔菲研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Oct 28;71(712):e815-e825. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0265. Print 2021 Nov.
6
Research on public opinion guidance of converging media based on AHP and transmission dynamics.基于层次分析法和传播动力学的融合媒体舆论引导研究。
Math Biosci Eng. 2021 Aug 17;18(5):6857-6886. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021341.
7
Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India.基于地理信息系统的层次分析法与模糊层次分析法在医院选址中的比较:以印度普拉亚格拉杰市为例
GeoJournal. 2022;87(5):3507-3528. doi: 10.1007/s10708-021-10445-y. Epub 2021 May 28.
8
Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method.采用德尔菲法制定的新型冠状病毒肺炎相关急性呼吸衰竭管理专家共识声明
Crit Care. 2021 Mar 16;25(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03491-y.
9
Modified Delphi Study on Nursing Practice and Science in Fetal Care.德尔菲法研究胎儿护理中的护理实践与科学
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021 Jan;50(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.09.158. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
10
Evaluating critical barriers and pathways to implementation of e-waste formalization management systems in Ghana: a hybrid BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS approach.评估加纳实施电子废物正规化管理系统的关键障碍和途径:混合 BWM 和模糊 TOPSIS 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(35):44561-44584. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10360-8. Epub 2020 Aug 9.