• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长新冠的识别、诊断和管理建议:德尔菲研究。

Recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of long COVID: a Delphi study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London.

Department of Acute Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Oct 28;71(712):e815-e825. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0265. Print 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2021.0265
PMID:34607799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8510689/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the absence of research into therapies and care pathways for long COVID, guidance based on 'emerging experience' is needed.

AIM

To provide a rapid expert guide for GPs and long COVID clinical services.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A Delphi study was conducted with a panel of primary and secondary care doctors.

METHOD

Recommendations were generated relating to the investigation and management of long COVID. These were distributed online to a panel of UK doctors (any specialty) with an interest in, lived experience of, and/or experience treating long COVID. Over two rounds of Delphi testing, panellists indicated their agreement with each recommendation (using a five-point Likert scale) and provided comments. Recommendations eliciting a response of 'strongly agree', 'agree', or 'neither agree nor disagree' from 90% or more of responders were taken as showing consensus.

RESULTS

Thirty-three clinicians representing 14 specialties reached consensus on 35 recommendations. Chiefly, GPs should consider long COVID in the presence of a wide range of presenting features (not limited to fatigue and breathlessness) and exclude differential diagnoses where appropriate. Detailed history and examination with baseline investigations should be conducted in primary care. Indications for further investigation and specific therapies (for myocarditis, postural tachycardia syndrome, mast cell disorder) include hypoxia/desaturation, chest pain, palpitations, and histamine-related symptoms. Rehabilitation should be individualised, with careful activity pacing (to avoid relapse) and multidisciplinary support.

CONCLUSION

Long COVID clinics should operate as part of an integrated care system, with GPs playing a key role in the multidisciplinary team. Holistic care pathways, investigation of specific complications, management of potential symptom clusters, and tailored rehabilitation are needed.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏针对长新冠的治疗方法和护理途径的研究,因此需要基于“新兴经验”提供指导。

目的

为全科医生和长新冠临床服务提供快速的专家指南。

设计和设置

采用德尔菲研究法,对初级和二级保健医生小组进行研究。

方法

针对长新冠的调查和管理,生成了相关建议。这些建议在线分发给对长新冠有兴趣、有亲身经历或有治疗经验的英国医生(任何专业)。在两轮德尔菲测试中,小组成员使用五点李克特量表表示对每条建议的同意程度(表示同意、较同意、不确定、较不同意、不同意),并提供意见。如果 90%或更多的应答者对某条建议的回答是“非常同意”、“同意”或“不确定”,则认为该建议达成共识。

结果

33 名代表 14 个专业的临床医生就 35 条建议达成共识。主要的是,全科医生应考虑到广泛的临床表现(不仅限于疲劳和呼吸困难)出现时存在长新冠,并在适当情况下排除鉴别诊断。在初级保健中应进行详细的病史和体格检查,并进行基线调查。进一步调查和特定治疗(如心肌炎、体位性心动过速综合征、肥大细胞疾病)的指征包括缺氧/低氧血症、胸痛、心悸和与组胺相关的症状。康复应该个体化,进行仔细的活动节奏控制(以避免复发)和多学科支持。

结论

长新冠诊所应该作为综合护理系统的一部分运作,全科医生在多学科团队中发挥关键作用。需要制定整体护理途径、调查特定并发症、管理潜在症状群,并进行针对性康复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba8/8544158/d901ac0810be/bjgpnov-2021-71-712-e815.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba8/8544158/d901ac0810be/bjgpnov-2021-71-712-e815.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba8/8544158/d901ac0810be/bjgpnov-2021-71-712-e815.jpg

相似文献

1
Recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of long COVID: a Delphi study.长新冠的识别、诊断和管理建议:德尔菲研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Oct 28;71(712):e815-e825. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0265. Print 2021 Nov.
2
Building consensus on the selection criteria used when providing regional anaesthesia for rib fractures. An e-Delphi study amongst a UK-wide expert panel.就提供肋骨骨折区域麻醉时使用的选择标准达成共识。一项在英国范围内的专家小组中进行的电子德尔菲研究。
Injury. 2024 Jan;55(1):110967. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.110967. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Multidisciplinary collaborative guidance on the assessment and treatment of patients with Long COVID: A compendium statement.关于长新冠患者评估与治疗的多学科协作指南:一份概要声明
PM R. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13397.
4
Development of the consensus-based recommendations for Podiatry care of Neuropathy In Cancer Survivors (PodNICS): a Delphi consensus study of Australian podiatrists.基于共识的癌症幸存者神经病变足部护理推荐意见的制定(PodNICS):澳大利亚足病医生的 Delphi 共识研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jun 9;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00632-0.
5
A Delphi Consensus Approach for the Management of Chronic Pain during and after the COVID-19 Era.德尔菲共识方法在新冠疫情期间和之后对慢性疼痛的管理
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 19;18(24):13372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413372.
6
A modified Delphi survey to build expert consensus on the structure and content of an enhanced care pathway for cognitive changes after stroke in the UK.一项改良的德尔菲调查,旨在就英国中风后认知变化强化护理路径的结构和内容达成专家共识。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11551-6.
7
Evaluation of the Development, Implementation, Maintenance, and Impact of 3 Digital Surveillance Tools Deployed in Malawi During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study.对 COVID-19 大流行期间在马拉维部署的 3 种数字监测工具的开发、实施、维护及影响的评估:一项改良德尔菲专家共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 31;13:e58389. doi: 10.2196/58389.
8
Global Delphi consensus on treatment goals for generalized pustular psoriasis.关于泛发性脓疱型银屑病治疗目标的全球德尔菲共识。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):706-716. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae491.
9
ORCHESTRA Delphi consensus: diagnostic and therapeutic management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatological diseases.德尔菲专家共识:风湿性疾病患者感染新型冠状病毒2的诊断与治疗管理
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Jun;31(8S):S37-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.030. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
10
Expert Consensus on the Use of the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt Device in the Treatment of Glaucoma: A Modified Delphi Panel.PRESERFLO™微分流装置治疗青光眼的专家共识:改良德尔菲小组
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Oct;11(5):1743-1766. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00529-4. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus based recommendations for the management of post-COVID long-term sequelae (Long COVID): a regional perspective.基于共识的新冠后长期后遗症(长新冠)管理建议:区域视角
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 6;12:1453167. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1453167. eCollection 2025.
2
Design and validation of an energy level diary for fatigue management in patients with post-COVID syndrome.新冠后综合征患者疲劳管理能量水平日记的设计与验证
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jul 21;6:1633466. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1633466. eCollection 2025.
3
Long Covid: A call for global action.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-covid syndrome in individuals admitted to hospital with covid-19: retrospective cohort study.新冠后综合征在因新冠住院的个体中的表现:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 31;372:n693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n693.
2
Multiorgan impairment in low-risk individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a prospective, community-based study.新冠病毒感染后综合征低危人群的多器官损害:一项前瞻性、基于社区的研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;11(3):e048391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048391.
3
'Reluctant pioneer': A qualitative study of doctors' experiences as patients with long COVID.
长期新冠:呼吁全球采取行动。
Public Health Chall. 2023 Feb 13;2(1):e69. doi: 10.1002/puh2.69. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Responsible artificial intelligence in public health: a Delphi study on risk communication, community engagement and infodemic management.公共卫生领域的负责任人工智能:关于风险沟通、社区参与和信息疫情管理的德尔菲研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 23;10(5):e018545. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018545.
5
Overview of Long COVID: Navigating the Aftermath.新冠长期症状概述:应对后遗症
J Brown Hosp Med. 2025 Apr 1;4(2):133879. doi: 10.56305/001c.133879. eCollection 2025.
6
Gut microbiota in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome: not the end of the story.新冠后急性综合征中的肠道微生物群:故事尚未结束。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Dec 24;15:1500890. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1500890. eCollection 2024.
7
Treatments for Long COVID autonomic dysfunction: a scoping review.新冠后自主神经功能障碍的治疗:一项范围综述
Clin Auton Res. 2025 Feb;35(1):5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01081-w. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
8
Health care for patients with long COVID: a scoping review.长新冠患者的医疗保健:范围综述。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Oct 25;58:e20240056. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0056en. eCollection 2024.
9
Text mining method to unravel long COVID's clinical condition in hospitalized patients.文本挖掘方法揭示住院患者长新冠的临床状况。
Cell Death Dis. 2024 Sep 13;15(9):671. doi: 10.1038/s41419-024-07043-4.
10
Enhancing long COVID care in general practice: A qualitative study.改善全科医学中长新冠的护理:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0306077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306077. eCollection 2024.
“不情愿的先驱者”:一项关于医生作为长新冠患者的体验的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):833-842. doi: 10.1111/hex.13223. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Long-COVID postural tachycardia syndrome: an American Autonomic Society statement.长新冠姿势性心动过速综合征:美国自主神经学会声明。
Clin Auton Res. 2021 Jun;31(3):365-368. doi: 10.1007/s10286-021-00798-2. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
Direct and indirect evidence of efficacy and safety of rapid exercise tests for exertional desaturation in Covid-19: a rapid systematic review.直接和间接证据表明,快速运动试验对新冠病毒感染所致运动性低氧血症的疗效和安全性:快速系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 16;10(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01620-w.
6
Evaluation for Myocarditis in Competitive Student Athletes Recovering From Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.应用心脏磁共振成像评估 COVID-19 后康复的竞技性学生运动员的心肌炎。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Aug 1;6(8):945-950. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7444.
7
NICE guideline on long covid.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所关于长期新冠的指南。
BMJ. 2020 Dec 23;371:m4938. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4938.
8
Long COVID guidelines need to reflect lived experience.长期新冠指南需要反映实际经历。
Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):455-457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32705-7. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
Screening of Potential Cardiac Involvement in Competitive Athletes Recovering From COVID-19: An Expert Consensus Statement.从 COVID-19 中康复的竞技运动员的潜在心脏受累筛查:专家共识声明。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec;13(12):2635-2652. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
10
Autonomic dysfunction in 'long COVID': rationale, physiology and management strategies.“长新冠”中的自主神经功能障碍:原理、生理学和管理策略。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Jan;21(1):e63-e67. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0896. Epub 2020 Nov 26.