Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间焦虑和抑郁的轨迹变化,以及心理灵活性的保护作用:一项四波纵向研究。

The trajectories of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic and the protective role of psychological flexibility: A four-wave longitudinal study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 5, 40127 Bologna, Italy; Laboratory of Psychosomatics and Clinimetrics, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Europa 115, 47023 Cesena, Italy.

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2022 Jun 15;307:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.067. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Published reports on the adverse mental health impacts of the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic suggest an emerging global mental health crisis. However, the trajectories of these mental health impacts over multiple COVID-19 peaks and corresponding lockdowns are unknown. This study explored the trajectories of anxiety and depression over two consecutive lockdowns during the first nine months of the pandemic in Europe (April 2020-January 2021) and examined whether they varied as a function of different psychological flexibility and inflexibility profiles.

METHODS

A total of 569 Italians completed online surveys at four assessment points. Trajectories of anxiety and depression were examined with latent growth modeling and according to different psychological flexibility and inflexibility profiles.

RESULTS

Anxiety increased linearly throughout the study period, whereas depression displayed a quadratic trajectory evidencing a decrease with the easing of the first lockdown followed by an increase during the second lockdown. Furthermore, two profiles were identified that displayed different anxiety and depression trajectories. Compared to the psychologically flexible profile, the psychologically inflexible profile reported significantly higher anxiety and depression which remained higher across the study period.

LIMITATIONS

A reliance on self-report measures and convenience sampling constitute key study limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that high psychological inflexibility is a risk factor for prolonged elevated anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas high psychological flexibility is a protective factor. Psychological flexibility and inflexibility should be targeted by preventive public health interventions that harness evidence-based strategies shown to effectively target these factors.

摘要

背景

已发表的关于 COVID-19 大流行初始阶段对心理健康的不良影响的报告表明,一场新的全球心理健康危机正在出现。然而,这些心理健康影响在多次 COVID-19 高峰和相应的封锁期间的发展轨迹尚不清楚。本研究探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行的前九个月(2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 1 月)在欧洲进行的两次连续封锁期间焦虑和抑郁的发展轨迹,并研究了它们是否因不同的心理灵活性和不灵活性特征而有所不同。

方法

共有 569 名意大利人在四个评估点完成了在线调查。使用潜在增长模型根据不同的心理灵活性和不灵活性特征来检查焦虑和抑郁的轨迹。

结果

焦虑在整个研究期间呈线性增加,而抑郁呈二次轨迹,表明随着第一次封锁的缓解,抑郁水平降低,随后在第二次封锁期间增加。此外,还确定了两个显示不同焦虑和抑郁轨迹的特征。与心理灵活特征相比,心理不灵活特征报告的焦虑和抑郁明显更高,并且在整个研究期间保持较高水平。

局限性

依赖于自我报告的测量和便利抽样是研究的主要局限性。

结论

结果表明,高度的心理不灵活性是 COVID-19 大流行期间长时间焦虑和抑郁升高的危险因素,而高度的心理灵活性是保护因素。心理灵活性和不灵活性应成为预防公共卫生干预措施的目标,这些干预措施利用已证明可有效针对这些因素的基于证据的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d9/8972980/e927a623adf9/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验