• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Low educational quality and trustworthiness of YouTube videos by physiotherapists on shoulder joint mobilization techniques: a descriptive study.低质量的教育和物理治疗师在肩关节松动技术方面的 YouTube 视频的可信度:一项描述性研究。
J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Dec;30(6):334-341. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2056319. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability.YouTube 上关于肩关节不稳定的内容质量评估。
Phys Sportsmed. 2022 Aug;50(4):289-294. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2021.1942286. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
4
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Patient education on subacromial impingement syndrome : Reliability and educational quality of content available on Google and YouTube.肩峰下撞击综合征患者教育:Google 和 YouTube 上内容的可靠性和教育质量。
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;51(12):1003-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04294-x. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
6
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
7
YouTube provides insufficient information on patellofemoral instability.YouTube 提供的髌股关节不稳定信息不足。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022 Sep;56(5):306-310. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005.
8
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.
9
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on Open access video sharing platform YouTube.评估在开放获取视频分享平台 YouTube 上分享的心肺复苏术视频的可靠性、实用性和信息质量。
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Sep;23(3):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Freely available, online videos to support neurological physiotherapists and students in task-specific training skill acquisition: a scoping review.免费的在线视频可用于支持神经物理治疗师和学生进行特定任务的培训技能习得:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 31;24(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05545-5.
2
AI-Enhanced evaluation of YouTube content on post-surgical incontinence following pelvic cancer treatment.人工智能辅助评估YouTube上关于盆腔癌治疗后手术失禁的内容。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 May 4;26:101677. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101677. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.YouTube 作为脑卒中患者经颅磁刺激的信息来源:一项质量、可靠性和准确性分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105309. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105309. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
2
YouTube as a learning tool for four shoulder tests.YouTube作为四种肩部测试的学习工具。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Oct 30;20:e70. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000804.
3
Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上分享的脊柱后凸视频中的信息准确性和质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1334-E1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691.
4
YouTube™ as a Source of Instructional Videos on Bowel Preparation: a Content Analysis.YouTube™作为肠道准备教学视频的来源:一项内容分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):755-759. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0888-y.
5
YouTube as a source of information on dialysis: a content analysis.YouTube作为透析信息来源:一项内容分析。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 May;20(5):315-20. doi: 10.1111/nep.12397.
6
Instructional video for teaching venepuncture.静脉穿刺教学指导视频。
Clin Teach. 2014 Oct;11(6):436-41. doi: 10.1111/tct.12198.
7
A quality assessment of respiratory auscultation material on YouTube.YouTube上呼吸听诊材料的质量评估
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Aug;14(4):391-5. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-4-391.
8
Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices.社交媒体与医疗保健专业人员:益处、风险及最佳实践
P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520.
9
Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension?视频分享网站是高血压信息的有用来源吗?
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Jul;8(7):481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Understanding pharmacokinetics: are YouTube videos a useful learning resource?了解药物动力学:YouTube视频是有用的学习资源吗?
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Jul;18(13):1957-67.

低质量的教育和物理治疗师在肩关节松动技术方面的 YouTube 视频的可信度:一项描述性研究。

Low educational quality and trustworthiness of YouTube videos by physiotherapists on shoulder joint mobilization techniques: a descriptive study.

机构信息

Ashok & Rita Patel Institute of Physiotherapy, Charotar University of Science & Technology (CHARUSAT), Charusat Campus, Changa, Gujarat India.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Dec;30(6):334-341. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2056319. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1080/10669817.2022.2056319
PMID:35384791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9621245/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Physiotherapists and students may be vulnerable to false information and may learn faulty treatment techniques due to inadequate educational quality and uncertainty about sources and trustworthiness of YouTube videos.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate educational quality, trustworthiness, and content completeness of joint mobilization techniques demonstrating videos available on YouTube.

DESIGN

This is a descriptive study.

METHODS

We performed a YouTube search on 1 April 2019, using the keyword 'Maitland joint mobilization technique for shoulder joint'. Three academic physiotherapists independently rated each video for educational quality, trustworthiness, and content completeness using the Global Quality Score, Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria and joint mobilization content completeness scale, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifteen videos were included in the study. The median number of views for videos was 1263 (IQR 578-1478), and the median duration was 140 seconds (IQR 71-301 seconds). Most videos had low content quality (87%), poor joint mobilization content completeness (80%), and limited trustworthiness. All videos had low source quality (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of quality information on shoulder joint mobilization techniques on YouTube, which makes it a limited educational tool for physiotherapists and students.

摘要

简介

物理治疗师和学生可能容易受到虚假信息的影响,并且由于教育质量不足以及对 YouTube 视频来源和可信度的不确定性,可能会学习到错误的治疗技术。

目的

调查 YouTube 上演示关节松动技术的视频的教育质量、可信度和内容完整性。

设计

这是一项描述性研究。

方法

我们于 2019 年 4 月 1 日使用关键字“Maitland 肩关节关节松动技术”在 YouTube 上进行了搜索。三名学术物理治疗师分别使用全球质量评分、美国医学协会(JAMA)基准标准和关节松动内容完整性量表,对每个视频的教育质量、可信度和内容完整性进行独立评分。

结果

共有 15 个视频纳入研究。视频的平均观看次数为 1263 次(IQR 578-1478),平均时长为 140 秒(IQR 71-301 秒)。大多数视频的内容质量较低(87%)、关节松动内容完整性较差(80%)且可信度有限。所有视频的来源质量都较低(100%)。

结论

YouTube 上关于肩关节松动技术的高质量信息缺乏,这使其成为物理治疗师和学生有限的教育工具。