Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Hematology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226114. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6114.
Patient-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genomic loss (HLA loss) is one of the reputed mechanisms of leukemia immune escape and relapse after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, clinical characteristics and prognosis of this distinct relapse type in the setting of haploidentical HSCT based on antithymocyte globulin (ATG) T-cell-replete conditioning are still unknown, especially for patients with lymphoid leukemia.
To identify the incidence of and patient characteristics associated with HLA loss at hematologic cancer relapse after ATG-based haploidentical HSCT and to assess overall survival after HLA loss at relapse.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective and multicenter case series study used data from medical records to identify patients who experienced relapse of hematologic cancer after receipt of ATG-based haploidentical HSCT. The study included 788 consecutive patients aged 8 to 70 years with lymphoid or myeloid leukemia who received ATG T-cell-replete haploidentical HSCT at the Zhejiang Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation between May 1, 2012, and May 31, 2021.
Relapse after ATG-based haploidentical HSCT.
Incidence, risk factors, and postrelapse overall survival among patients with HLA loss at hematologic cancer relapse after receipt of haploidentical HSCT. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify characteristics associated with the likelihood of HLA loss, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate postrelapse survival.
A total of 788 patients who received haploidentical HSCT for hematologic cancer were identified, 180 of whom experienced relapse after HSCT. Of those, 106 evaluable patients (median age, 30.9 years [range, 8.3-64.6 years]; 54 female [50.9%] and 52 male [49.1%]) were screened for HLA loss, which was detected in 54 patients (50.9%). Patients with HLA loss experienced relapse later than those without HLA loss (lymphoid group: median, 323 days [range, 98-2056 days] vs 151 days [range, 57-2544 days]; P = .01; myeloid group: median, 321 days [range, 55-1574 days] vs 223 days [range, 68-546 days]; P = .03). Among patients with lymphoid leukemia, those with minimal residual disease positivity before hematologic relapse (odds ratio [OR], 28.47; 95% CI, 1.99-407.98; P = .01), those with chronic graft-vs-host disease (OR, 27.68; 95% CI, 1.40-546.88; P = .03), and those with more than 180 days between HSCT and relapse (OR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.32-36.22; P = .02) were more likely to lose unshared HLA at relapse, whereas male patients (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.003-0.32; P = .04) were more likely to preserve their HLA genome at relapse. Patients with myeloid leukemia had different factors associated with HLA loss, including underweight status (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.60; P = .01) and acute graft-vs-host disease (OR, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.14-20.53; P = .03). The receipt of preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion among patients with minimal residual disease recurrence did not postpone hematologic cancer relapse in those with HLA loss (median, 322 days [range, 204-1030 days]) compared with no receipt of donor lymphocyte infusion (median, 340 days [range, 215 days to not available]; P > .99).
In this study, HLA loss at leukemia relapse occurred frequently after receipt of ATG-based haploidentical HSCT. The identification of risk factors associated with HLA loss would help to prompt screening, avoid potentially harmful infusions of donor T cells, and develop alternative therapeutic strategies.
重要性:患者特异性人类白细胞抗原(HLA)基因组缺失(HLA 缺失)是白血病免疫逃逸和单倍体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后复发的一种公认机制。然而,基于抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)T 细胞丰富的预处理的单倍体 HSCT 背景下,这种独特的复发类型的临床特征和预后仍然未知,尤其是对于淋巴细胞白血病患者。
目的:确定 HLA 缺失与基于 ATG 的单倍体 HSCT 后 HLA 缺失相关的患者特征,并评估 HLA 缺失后复发的总生存率。
设计、地点和参与者:本回顾性多中心病例系列研究使用病历数据来确定接受基于 ATG 的单倍体 HSCT 后血液系统恶性肿瘤复发的患者。该研究包括 788 例年龄在 8 至 70 岁之间的连续患者,他们患有淋巴细胞或髓系白血病,于 2012 年 5 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日期间在浙江血液和骨髓移植合作组接受了基于 ATG 的 T 细胞丰富的单倍体 HSCT。
暴露:基于 ATG 的单倍体 HSCT 后复发。
主要结果和措施:HLA 缺失在 HLA 缺失相关血液系统恶性肿瘤复发患者中的发生率、风险因素和复发后总生存率。逻辑回归分析用于确定与 HLA 缺失可能性相关的特征,Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归分析用于评估复发后的生存率。
结果:共确定了 788 例接受血液系统恶性肿瘤单倍体 HSCT 的患者,其中 180 例在 HSCT 后复发。在这 106 例可评估患者中(中位年龄 30.9 岁[范围 8.3-64.6 岁];女性 54 例[50.9%],男性 52 例[49.1%]),筛查了 HLA 缺失,其中 54 例(50.9%)检测到 HLA 缺失。与无 HLA 缺失的患者相比,HLA 缺失的患者复发时间较晚(淋巴细胞组:中位数 323 天[范围 98-2056 天] vs 151 天[范围 57-2544 天];P=0.01;髓系组:中位数 321 天[范围 55-1574 天] vs 223 天[范围 68-546 天];P=0.03)。在淋巴细胞白血病患者中,那些在血液学复发前微小残留病阳性(优势比[OR],28.47;95%CI,1.99-407.98;P=0.01)、患有慢性移植物抗宿主病(OR,27.68;95%CI,1.40-546.88;P=0.03)和 HSCT 与复发之间的时间超过 180 天(OR,6.91;95%CI,1.32-36.22;P=0.02)的患者更有可能在复发时失去非共享 HLA,而男性患者(OR,0.03;95%CI,0.003-0.32;P=0.04)则更有可能在复发时保留其 HLA 基因组。患有髓系白血病的患者与 HLA 缺失相关的因素不同,包括体重过轻(OR,0.10;95%CI,0.02-0.60;P=0.01)和急性移植物抗宿主病(OR,4.84;95%CI,1.14-20.53;P=0.03)。在 HLA 缺失的患者中,接受最小残留病复发的预防性供者淋巴细胞输注并没有延迟血液系统恶性肿瘤的复发(无 HLA 缺失患者的中位时间为 322 天[范围为 204-1030 天])与未接受供者淋巴细胞输注的患者相比(中位时间为 340 天[范围为 215 天至无可用时间];P>0.99)。
结论和相关性:在本研究中,基于 ATG 的单倍体 HSCT 后,HLA 缺失在白血病复发时经常发生。识别与 HLA 缺失相关的风险因素将有助于提示筛查,避免潜在有害的供者 T 细胞输注,并制定替代治疗策略。