Suppr超能文献

虚假记忆与欺骗的新方法及认知神经科学视角

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception.

作者信息

Toglia Michael P, Schmuller Joseph, Surprenant Britni G, Hooper Katherine C, DeMeo Natasha N, Wallace Brett L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 21;13:721961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.721961. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The DRM (Deese-Roediger-McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., , and ) participants falsely remember the critical item "sleep." We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime "sleep" but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex.

摘要

DRM(迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特)范式会产生对未呈现的关键单词的强烈错误记忆。在学习了一个主题词表(例如, ,以及 )之后,参与者会错误地记住关键项目“睡眠”。我们报告了两个错误记忆实验。研究一引入了词汇判断任务(LDT)的一种新用法来启动关键单词。参与者会看到两个字母串,并做出限时反应,表明它们是否都是单词。单词对“Night-Bed”和“Dream-Thweeb”都启动了“睡眠”,但只有一对包含两个单词。我们的主要目的是在两个试点实验中引入这种新方法。这些结果被认为是初步的,但很有前景,因为它们表明参与者识别关键单词(错误记忆)和呈现单词(真实记忆)的可能性与学习主题词表时一样。研究二实际使用了标准的DRM列表,因此语义启动在其中也起作用。然而,第二项研究使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)来测量在DRM任务期间前额叶皮层的活动,该任务包括一个欺骗阶段,参与者故意对关键诱饵说谎。错误记忆和真实记忆大量出现,并激活了许多相同的脑区,但与真实记忆相比,错误记忆和谎言的皮层活动更高。准确性结果伴随着信心和反应时间结果。两项研究都表明,很难区分准确记忆和不准确记忆。我们根据激活监测理论和模糊痕迹理论来解释结果。我们提供了现实世界的意义,并建议将当前研究扩展到不同年龄组和特殊人群。一个一直存在的棘手问题尚未得到令人满意的答案:是否存在能够表明错误记忆和谎言存在的神经通路?要回答这个问题,需要进行聚焦于区分区域(如前额叶前部皮层)的成像实验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0698/8979290/659f56386f58/fpsyg-13-721961-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验