Horta-Baas Gabriel
Rheumatology Department, Hospital General Regional # 1, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Mar 30;13:79-95. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S256715. eCollection 2022.
This review aims to provide an overview of the impact of TNFis biosimilars, with marketing authorization, in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) scores and explore how PROMs endpoints might add value in biosimilars uptake in RA patients.
A comprehensive search of Medline, Scopus, Lilacs, and CINAHL databases was performed for papers published between January 2012 and December 2021. For inclusion, studies had to be prospective, published in a peer-reviewed journal, published in English or Spanish language; studies using PROMs as an outcome measure. After screening title and abstracts and assessing the remaining full texts fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 31 papers were used in this narrative review.
PROMs were used as secondary outcomes in included studies. The most frequently employed domains to assess biosimilar efficacy include physical function, patient global assessment (PtGA), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and fatigue. The results of randomized clinical trials uniformly showed that mean change in PROMs scores is comparable between biosimilar and reference biologic treatment groups. However, open-label and real-world studies revealed high rates of discontinuation of therapy, mainly for subjective worsening of disease activity or non-specific adverse events. Even without objective clinical evidence of inflammation, patients who are considered to have active disease (higher scores on PtGA) have higher discontinuation rates of biosimilars. The available information suggests that the nocebo effect is the most likely cause for the discontinuation of biosimilars.
There is scarce literature surrounding the impact of biosimilars in PROMs, especially in open-label studies. In real-life studies, biosimilars have a higher discontinuation rate than reference products. TNFis biosimilars treatment efficacy in RA depends on disease activity and other factors such as PtGA and fatigue. The nocebo effect is the best explanation for biosimilar's discontinuation.
本综述旨在概述已获得上市许可的肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFis)生物类似药对患者报告结局指标(PROMs)评分的影响,并探讨PROMs终点指标如何在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者使用生物类似药方面增加价值。
对2012年1月至2021年12月发表的论文全面检索了Medline、Scopus、Lilacs和CINAHL数据库。纳入的研究必须是前瞻性的,发表在同行评审期刊上,以英文或西班牙文发表;使用PROMs作为结局指标。在筛选标题和摘要并评估其余符合纳入标准的全文后,本叙述性综述使用了31篇论文。
PROMs在纳入研究中用作次要结局。评估生物类似药疗效最常用的领域包括身体功能、患者整体评估(PtGA)、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和疲劳。随机临床试验结果一致表明,生物类似药治疗组和参照生物制剂治疗组之间PROMs评分的平均变化具有可比性。然而,开放标签和真实世界研究显示治疗中断率很高,主要原因是疾病活动主观恶化或非特异性不良事件。即使没有炎症的客观临床证据,被认为患有活动性疾病(PtGA评分较高)的患者停用生物类似药的比例也更高。现有信息表明,反安慰剂效应是停用生物类似药最可能的原因。
关于生物类似药对PROMs影响的文献很少,尤其是在开放标签研究中。在现实生活研究中,生物类似药的停药率高于参照产品。TNFis生物类似药在RA中的治疗疗效取决于疾病活动度以及其他因素,如PtGA和疲劳。反安慰剂效应是生物类似药停药的最佳解释。