• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Prospective Comparative Study between Implantable Phakic Intraocular Contact Lens and Implantable Collamer Lens in Treatment of Myopia in Adults.成人近视治疗中可植入式有晶状体眼人工晶状体与可植入式胶原晶状体的前瞻性对比研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 28;2022:9212253. doi: 10.1155/2022/9212253. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between two types of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.两种后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体矫正近视及近视散光的临床效果比较分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;67(7):1061-1065. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1501_18.
3
Safety and efficacy of implantable phakic contact lens versus implantable collamer lens in myopia correction.可植入式有晶状体眼接触镜与可植入式角膜胶原交联晶状体矫正近视的安全性和有效性比较
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 31;12(4):160-167. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1482. eCollection 2023 Winter.
4
Initial clinical outcomes of two different phakic posterior chamber IOLs for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.两种不同的有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体矫正近视和近视散光的初步临床结果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 May;260(5):1763-1772. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05465-w. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
5
A comparative study of two phakic posterior chamber implantable lenses.两种有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体的对比研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 17;103(20):e38194. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038194.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Hole Implantable Collamer Lens in Comparison with Original Implantable Collamer Lens in Patients with Moderate to High Myopia.与原始可植入式角膜胶原晶状体相比,孔型可植入式角膜胶原晶状体治疗中高度近视患者的疗效和安全性
J Med Assoc Thai. 2017 Feb;100 Suppl 1:S48-55.
7
Flexural and Cell Adhesion Characteristic of Phakic Implantable Lenses.有晶状体眼人工晶状体的挠曲和细胞黏附特性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 10;59(7):1282. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071282.
8
Phakic intraocular lenses for the treatment of refractive errors: an evidence-based analysis.用于治疗屈光不正的有晶状体眼人工晶状体:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(14):1-120. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism by Implantation of a Phakic Posterior Chamber Implantable Collamer Lens.通过植入有晶状体后房可植入胶原晶状体矫正近视和近视散光。
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2019 Winter;74(4):147-152. doi: 10.31348/2018/1/4-4-2018.
10
Evaluation of Visual Outcome of 2 Phakic Posterior Chamber Implantable Lenses in High Myopia: A Comparative Study.两种有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体矫正高度近视的视觉效果评估:一项对比研究
Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Jan 1;48(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000854.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study of two phakic posterior chamber implantable lenses.两种有晶状体眼后房型人工晶状体的对比研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 17;103(20):e38194. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038194.
2
Safety and efficacy of implantable phakic contact lens versus implantable collamer lens in myopia correction.可植入式有晶状体眼接触镜与可植入式角膜胶原交联晶状体矫正近视的安全性和有效性比较
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 31;12(4):160-167. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1482. eCollection 2023 Winter.
3
One-stage versus two-stage bilateral implantable collamer lens implantation: a comparison of efficacy and safety.一期与两期双侧可折叠人工晶状体植入术:疗效和安全性比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54101-0.
4
Comparison of formulas in the implantable collamer lens vault prediction.人工晶状体拱顶预测公式的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36542. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036542.
5
Flexural and Cell Adhesion Characteristic of Phakic Implantable Lenses.有晶状体眼人工晶状体的挠曲和细胞黏附特性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 10;59(7):1282. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071282.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between two types of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.两种后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体矫正近视及近视散光的临床效果比较分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;67(7):1061-1065. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1501_18.
2
Long-term safety of posterior chamber implantable phakic contact lens for the correction of myopia.后房型可植入有晶状体眼接触镜矫正近视的长期安全性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 7;13:137-142. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S185304. eCollection 2019.
3
Anterior Chamber Changes After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation in High Myopia Using Pentacam: A Prospective Study.使用Pentacam对高度近视患者植入可植入式角膜胶原晶状体后的前房变化:一项前瞻性研究
Ophthalmol Ther. 2017 Dec;6(2):343-349. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0109-3. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Comparison of early changes in and factors affecting vault following posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation without and with a central hole (ICL V4 and ICL V4c).后房型有孔和无孔(ICL V4和ICL V4c)可植入式角膜接触镜植入术后穹窿早期变化及影响因素的比较
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0336-8.
5
Long-Term Comparison of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens With and Without a Central Hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: Consort-Compliant Article.后房型有孔与无孔(有孔人工晶状体和传统人工晶状体)有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入治疗中高度近视和近视散光的长期比较:符合CONSORT标准的文章
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(14):e3270. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003270.
6
Comparison of anterior section parameters using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in myopic patients after ICL implantation.在植入有晶体眼人工晶状体(ICL)的近视患者中,使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描和超声生物显微镜对眼前节参数进行比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan 18;9(1):58-62. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.01.10. eCollection 2016.
7
Long-term clinical results of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation to correct myopia.后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入矫正近视的长期临床结果
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;44(6):481-7. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12691. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
Comparative study of 2 types of implantable collamer lenses, 1 with and 1 without a central artificial hole.2 种有中央人工孔和无中央人工孔可植入 Collamer 透镜的对比研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;157(6):1136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.01.032. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
9
Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopia.后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术治疗高度近视
Int J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec 18;6(6):831-5. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.06.16. eCollection 2013.
10
Comparison of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation using the double-pass instrument.应用双通道仪比较有中央孔(Hole ICL)和无中央孔(Conventional ICL)后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术后的像差和眼内散射。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 25;8(6):e66846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066846. Print 2013.

成人近视治疗中可植入式有晶状体眼人工晶状体与可植入式胶原晶状体的前瞻性对比研究。

A Prospective Comparative Study between Implantable Phakic Intraocular Contact Lens and Implantable Collamer Lens in Treatment of Myopia in Adults.

作者信息

Rateb Mahmoud, Gad Ahmed A M, Tohamy Dalia, Elmohamady Mohamed Nagy

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt.

Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 28;2022:9212253. doi: 10.1155/2022/9212253. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/9212253
PMID:35388352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8979746/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare implantable collamer lenses (ICLs) and acrylic implantable phakic contact lenses (IPCLs) in the treatment of myopia in adults, as regards refractive outcome and adverse effects.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized comparative study with phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) was carried out for treatment of myopia. Patients were randomized into two groups: one for ICL and the other for IPCL. Preoperative assessments included a full examination, pentacam, endothelial cell count, and biometry. We compared the adverse effects and refractive outcomes between both groups. The study was registered in clinical trials and the registration number is NCT04624035.

RESULTS

Sixty eyes of sixty patients (28 in the ICL group and 32 in the IPCL group) with a follow-up period of 12 months. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -12.7 ± 3.4 D and -13.6 ± 4.4 D in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively (=0.37). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent value was ±0.4 ± 0.2 D and ±0.6 ± 0.1 D in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) has improved from 1.3 ± 0.06 to 0.15 ± 0.02 Log MAR in the ICL group ( < 0.001) and from 1.3 ± 0.02 to 0.15 ± 0.01 Log MAR in the IPCL group ( < 0.001). The mean endothelial cell count was reduced by 3.3% in the IPCL group and by 3.2% in the IPCL group.

CONCLUSION

Both ICL and IPCL are effective methods to correct high myopia in adults with no statistically significant differences between the two lenses as regarding adverse effects.

摘要

目的

比较可植入式胶原晶状体(ICL)和丙烯酸可植入有晶状体眼接触镜(IPCL)在治疗成人近视方面的屈光效果和不良反应。

方法

对有晶状体眼人工晶状体(IOL)治疗近视进行前瞻性、随机对照研究。患者随机分为两组:一组植入ICL,另一组植入IPCL。术前评估包括全面检查、Pentacam检查、内皮细胞计数和生物测量。我们比较了两组之间的不良反应和屈光效果。该研究已在临床试验中注册,注册号为NCT04624035。

结果

60例患者的60只眼(ICL组28只眼,IPCL组32只眼),随访期为12个月。ICL组和IPCL组术前平均等效球镜度分别为-12.7±3.4D和-13.6±4.4D(P=0.37)。ICL组和IPCL组术后平均等效球镜度分别为±0.4±0.2D和±0.6±0.1D。ICL组未矫正视力(UCVA)从1.3±0.06提高到0.15±0.02 Log MAR(P<0.001),IPCL组从1.3±0.02提高到0.15±0.01 Log MAR(P<0.001)。IPCL组平均内皮细胞计数减少3.3%,ICL组减少3.2%。

结论

ICL和IPCL都是矫正成人高度近视的有效方法,两种晶状体在不良反应方面无统计学显著差异。