Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Glob Health. 2022 Apr 2;12:08004. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.08004. eCollection 2022.
Policymakers seeking to prioritize the use of restricted financial resources need to understand the relative costs and benefits of interventions for improving nutritional status. Improved linear growth can lead to increased education attainment and improved economic productivity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), though these non-health-related benefits are not reflected in current long-term modelling efforts, including the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Our objective was to integrate the effects of improved linear growth on non-health related benefit into LiST by estimating subsequent gains in years of schooling and wage earnings. We then estimated the impacts of reaching the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target for stunting in South Asian countries on lifetime productivity.
In the first step, we used LiST outputs to estimate the improved linear growth due to scaled-up nutrition interventions and used published estimates to quantify the education gain resulting from an increase in height for age z-score (HAZ). In the second step, we used published country-level estimates on economic returns to schooling to quantify the relative gains in wages that children born today will experience because of their additional education attainment in the future. In the last step, we used country-level data on wages to estimate the net present value of future earnings gained due to early childhood growth improvement per birth cohort.
If South Asia countries reach the SDG target by 2025, an estimated 8.6 million years of schooling will be obtained by six birth cohorts of 2020 to 2025. These six birth cohorts will also gain an estimated US$64 893 million in the present value term, at a 5% discount rate, in lifetime earnings. India has the largest expected gain in years of schooling (7367 years) and lifetime earnings (US$59 390 million in present value terms, at a 5% discount rate).
Two non-health-related benefits of improved linear growth - additional years of schooling and lifetime earnings - are added in LiST. Together with LiST costing, users can now conduct both cost-effective and benefit-cost analyses. Using both analyses will provide more comprehensive insights into nutrition interventions' relative costs and benefits.
政策制定者若想优先利用有限的财政资源,就需要了解改善营养状况的干预措施的相对成本和效益。在中低收入国家(LMICs),线性生长的改善可提高教育程度并提高经济生产力,尽管这些非健康相关的效益并未反映在当前的长期建模工作中,包括 Lives Saved Tool(LiST)。我们的目标是通过估计后续在校年限和工资收入的增加,将线性生长改善对非健康相关效益的影响纳入 LiST。然后,我们估计南亚国家实现可持续发展目标(SDG)中发育迟缓目标对终生生产力的影响。
在第一步中,我们使用 LiST 输出来估计因扩大营养干预而导致的线性生长改善,并使用已发表的估计值来量化身高年龄 z 分数(HAZ)增加所带来的教育收益。在第二步中,我们使用关于教育回报的已发表的国家层面估计值来量化由于未来额外教育程度的提高,今天出生的儿童将获得的相对工资收益。在最后一步,我们使用国家层面的工资数据来估计由于儿童早期生长改善而导致的每一生育 cohort未来收益的净现值。
如果南亚国家在 2025 年实现可持续发展目标,那么 2020 年至 2025 年的六个生育 cohort将获得约 860 万年的在校学习时间。在以 5%的贴现率计算的现值中,这六个生育 cohort的终身收入预计将增加 648930 万美元。印度的在校学习时间(7367 年)和终身收入(593900 万美元的现值,5%贴现率)的预期增长最大。
LiST 中增加了线性生长改善的两个非健康相关效益——额外的在校年限和终身收入。与 LiST 成本核算一起,用户现在可以进行成本效益和效益成本分析。使用这两种分析方法可以更全面地了解营养干预措施的相对成本和效益。