Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Center, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;59(10):1165-1177.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Borderline personality disorder in adolescence remains a controversial construct. We addressed concerns about the prognostic significance of adolescent borderline pathology by testing whether borderline symptoms at age 12 years predict functioning during the transition to adulthood, at age 18 years, in areas critical to life-course development.
We studied members of the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, which tracks the development of a birth cohort of 2,232 British twin children. At age 12, study members' borderline symptoms were measured using mothers' reports. At age 18, study members' personality, psychopathology, functional outcomes, and experiences of victimization were measured using self-reports, coinformant reports, and official records.
At age 18, study members who had more borderline symptoms at age 12 were more likely to have difficult personalities, to struggle with poor mental health, to experience poor functional outcomes, and to have become victims of violence. Reports of poor outcomes were corroborated by coinformants and official records. Borderline symptoms in study members at 12 years old predicted poor outcomes over and above other behavioral and emotional problems during adolescence. Twin analyses showed that borderline symptoms in 12-year-olds were influenced by familial risk, particularly genetic risk, which accounted for associations with most poor outcomes at age 18.
Borderline symptoms in 12-year-olds signal risk for pervasive poor functioning during the transition to adulthood. This association is driven by genetic influences, suggesting that borderline symptoms and poor outcomes are manifestations of shared genetic risk.
青少年边缘型人格障碍仍是一个有争议的概念。我们通过检验 12 岁时的边缘型症状是否能预测 18 岁向成年期过渡时对生活发展至关重要的领域的功能,来解决对青少年边缘型病理预后意义的担忧。
我们研究了环境风险(E-Risk)纵向双胞胎研究的成员,该研究跟踪了 2232 名英国双胞胎儿童出生队列的发展情况。在 12 岁时,使用母亲报告来衡量研究对象的边缘型症状。在 18 岁时,使用自我报告、共同报告和官方记录来衡量研究对象的人格、精神病理学、功能结果和受害经历。
在 18 岁时,12 岁时具有更多边缘型症状的研究对象更有可能具有困难的人格,难以应对心理健康问题,功能结果较差,并且成为暴力的受害者。共同报告者和官方记录证实了不良结果的报告。12 岁时研究对象的边缘型症状预示着在向成年期过渡期间出现广泛的不良结果,这超过了青春期期间其他行为和情绪问题的影响。双胞胎分析表明,12 岁时的边缘型症状受到家庭风险的影响,特别是遗传风险,遗传风险解释了与 18 岁时大多数不良结果的关联。
12 岁时的边缘型症状预示着向成年期过渡期间普遍存在功能不良的风险。这种关联是由遗传影响驱动的,这表明边缘型症状和不良结果是共同遗传风险的表现。