• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从认知偏差到用于智能基础设施监测的先进计算智能

From Cognitive Bias Toward Advanced Computational Intelligence for Smart Infrastructure Monitoring.

作者信息

Gordan Meisam, Chao Ong Zhi, Sabbagh-Yazdi Saeed-Reza, Wee Lai Khin, Ghaedi Khaled, Ismail Zubaidah

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. TOOSI University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 24;13:846610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846610. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846610
PMID:35401342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8990332/
Abstract

Visual inspections have been typically used in condition assessment of infrastructure. However, they are based on human judgment and their interpretation of data can differ from acquired results. In psychology, this difference is called cognitive bias which directly affects Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)-based decision making. Besides, the confusion between condition state and safety of a bridge is another example of cognitive bias in bridge monitoring. Therefore, integrated computer-based approaches as powerful tools can be significantly applied in SHM systems. This paper explores the relationship between the use of advanced computational intelligence and the development of SHM solutions through conducting an infrastructure monitoring methodology. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based algorithms, i.e., Artificial Neural Network (ANN), hybrid ANN-based Imperial Competitive Algorithm, and hybrid ANN-based Genetic Algorithm, are developed for damage assessment using a lab-scale composite bridge deck structure. Based on the comparison of the results, the employed evolutionary algorithms could improve the prediction error of the pre-developed network by enhancing the learning procedure of the ANN.

摘要

目视检查通常用于基础设施的状况评估。然而,它们基于人类判断,对数据的解读可能与获取的结果不同。在心理学中,这种差异被称为认知偏差,它直接影响基于结构健康监测(SHM)的决策。此外,桥梁状况状态与安全性之间的混淆是桥梁监测中认知偏差的另一个例子。因此,基于计算机的综合方法作为强大工具可在SHM系统中得到显著应用。本文通过实施一种基础设施监测方法,探讨了先进计算智能的使用与SHM解决方案开发之间的关系。基于人工智能(AI)的算法,即人工神经网络(ANN)、基于混合ANN的帝国竞争算法和基于混合ANN的遗传算法,被开发用于使用实验室规模的复合桥面板结构进行损伤评估。基于结果的比较,所采用的进化算法通过增强ANN的学习过程,可以改善预先开发网络的预测误差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/1806b0b45bd7/fpsyg-13-846610-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/52ee6ed6b3f9/fpsyg-13-846610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/79c3faa82240/fpsyg-13-846610-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/9f305a4ee50a/fpsyg-13-846610-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/1b93aea419e3/fpsyg-13-846610-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/1806b0b45bd7/fpsyg-13-846610-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/52ee6ed6b3f9/fpsyg-13-846610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/79c3faa82240/fpsyg-13-846610-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/9f305a4ee50a/fpsyg-13-846610-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/1b93aea419e3/fpsyg-13-846610-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4801/8990332/1806b0b45bd7/fpsyg-13-846610-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
From Cognitive Bias Toward Advanced Computational Intelligence for Smart Infrastructure Monitoring.从认知偏差到用于智能基础设施监测的先进计算智能
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 24;13:846610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846610. eCollection 2022.
2
A Novel Breast Cancer Diagnosis Scheme With Intelligent Feature and Parameter Selections.一种具有智能特征和参数选择的新型乳腺癌诊断方案。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Feb;214:106432. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106432. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
A Discussion of Building a Smart SHM Platform for Long-Span Bridge Monitoring.关于构建大跨度桥梁监测智能结构健康监测平台的探讨
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 16;24(10):3163. doi: 10.3390/s24103163.
4
Machine-Aided Bridge Deck Crack Condition State Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence.基于人工智能的桥面裂缝状态评估
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;23(9):4192. doi: 10.3390/s23094192.
5
Smartphone Prospects in Bridge Structural Health Monitoring, a Literature Review.智能手机在桥梁结构健康监测中的应用前景:文献综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 21;24(11):3287. doi: 10.3390/s24113287.
6
Identification of Bridge Key Performance Indicators Using Survival Analysis for Future Network-Wide Structural Health Monitoring.利用生存分析对未来全网络结构健康监测进行桥梁关键性能指标的识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 2;20(23):6894. doi: 10.3390/s20236894.
7
Improving one-dimensional pollution dispersion modeling in rivers using ANFIS and ANN-based GA optimized models.利用基于 ANFIS 和基于 ANN 的 GA 优化模型改进河流一维污染扩散模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(1):867-885. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3613-7. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
8
Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms-artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction.人工智能范式的性能评估——人工神经网络、模糊逻辑和自适应神经模糊推理系统在洪水预测中的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):25265-25282. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12410-1. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
A Machine-Learning-Based Approach for Railway Track Monitoring Using Acceleration Measured on an In-Service Train.一种基于机器学习的铁路轨道监测方法,利用在运行列车上测得的加速度进行监测。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 31;23(17):7568. doi: 10.3390/s23177568.
10
Prediction of sediment heavy metal at the Australian Bays using newly developed hybrid artificial intelligence models.利用新开发的混合人工智能模型预测澳大利亚湾的沉积物重金属。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Jan 1;268(Pt B):115663. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115663. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
The Measurement of Individual Differences in Cognitive Biases: A Review and Improvement.认知偏差中个体差异的测量:综述与改进
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:630177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630177. eCollection 2021.
2
Individual Differences in Attributes of Trust in Automation: Measurement and Application to System Design.自动化信任属性中的个体差异:测量及其在系统设计中的应用
Front Psychol. 2019 May 21;10:1117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01117. eCollection 2019.
3
A Neural Network Framework for Cognitive Bias.一种用于认知偏差的神经网络框架。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 3;9:1561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01561. eCollection 2018.
4
A Systematic Review of Experimental Paradigms for Exploring Biased Interpretation of Ambiguous Information with Emotional and Neutral Associations.探索带有情感和中性联想的模糊信息的偏向性解释的实验范式的系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 9;8:171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00171. eCollection 2017.
5
Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach.粒子群优化在分类中的特征选择:一种多目标方法。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2013 Dec;43(6):1656-71. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2227469.