• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度和英国男女婴儿非言语母婴护理比较:两种文化中的母婴护理触摸量表

A Comparison of Non-verbal Maternal Care of Male and Female Infants in India and the United Kingdom: The Parent-Infant Caregiving Touch Scale in Two Cultures.

作者信息

Hodsoll John, Pickles Andrew, Bozicevic Laura, Supraja Thirumalai Ananthanpillai, Hill Jonathan, Chandra Prabha S, Sharp Helen

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:852618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852618. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852618
PMID:35401353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8984138/
Abstract

Differences in infant caregiving behavior between cultures have long been noted, although the quantified comparison of touch-based caregiving using uniform standardized methodology has been much more limited. The Parent-Infant Caregiving Touch scale (PICTS) was developed for this purpose and programming effects of early parental tactile stimulation (stroking) on infant hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning (stress-response system), cardiovascular regulation and behavioral outcomes, similar to that reported in animals, have now been demonstrated. In order to inform future studies examining such programming effects in India, we first aimed to describe and examine, using parametric and non-parametric item-response methods, the item-response frequencies and characteristics of responses on the PICTS, and evidence for cross-cultural differential item functioning (DIF) in the United Kingdom (UK) and India. Second, in the context of a cultural favoring of male children in India, we also aimed to test the association between the sex of the infant and infant "stroking" in both cultural settings. The PICTS was administered at 8-12 weeks postpartum to mothers in two-cohort studies: The Wirral Child Health and Development Study, United Kingdom ( = 874) and the Bangalore Child Health and Development Study, India ( = 395). Mokken scale analysis, parametric item-response analysis, and structural equation modeling for categorical items were used. Items for two dimensions, one for stroking behavior and one for holding behavior, could be identified as meeting many of the criteria required for Mokken scales in the United Kingdom, only the stroking scale met these criteria in the sample from India. Thus, while a comparison between the two cultures was possible for the stroking construct, comparisons for the other non-verbal parenting constructs within PICTS were not. Analyses revealed higher rates of early stroking being reported for the United Kingdom than India, but no sex differences in rates in either country and no differential sex difference by culture. We conclude that PICTS items can be used reliably in both countries to conduct further research on the role of early tactile stimulation in shaping important child development outcomes.

摘要

不同文化间婴儿照料行为的差异早已为人所注意,不过,运用统一标准化方法对基于触摸的照料进行量化比较的情况则更为有限。为此开发了亲子照料触摸量表(PICTS),并且现已证明,早期父母触觉刺激(抚摸)对婴儿下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)轴功能(应激反应系统)、心血管调节及行为结果的编程效应,与在动物研究中报告的情况类似。为了给未来在印度检验此类编程效应的研究提供信息,我们首先旨在使用参数和非参数项目反应方法,描述并检验PICTS上的项目反应频率及反应特征,以及英国和印度跨文化差异项目功能(DIF)的证据。其次,鉴于印度存在重男轻女的文化倾向,我们还旨在检验两种文化背景下婴儿性别与婴儿“抚摸”之间的关联。在两项队列研究中,对产后8 - 12周的母亲施测了PICTS:英国的威尔拉尔儿童健康与发展研究(n = 874)和印度的班加罗尔儿童健康与发展研究(n = 395)。使用了莫肯量表分析、参数项目反应分析以及分类项目的结构方程模型。可以确定,有两个维度的项目,一个用于抚摸行为,一个用于怀抱行为,在英国符合莫肯量表所需的许多标准,而在印度样本中只有抚摸量表符合这些标准。因此,虽然对于抚摸结构可以在两种文化之间进行比较,但对于PICTS内的其他非言语养育结构则无法进行比较。分析显示,英国报告的早期抚摸发生率高于印度,但两国在抚摸发生率上均无性别差异,也没有因文化导致的性别差异。我们得出结论,PICTS项目在两国均可可靠地用于进一步研究早期触觉刺激在塑造重要儿童发育结果中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74da/8984138/1cef31ea35e9/fpsyg-13-852618-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74da/8984138/eef37443ed78/fpsyg-13-852618-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74da/8984138/c1b1a2396989/fpsyg-13-852618-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74da/8984138/1cef31ea35e9/fpsyg-13-852618-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74da/8984138/eef37443ed78/fpsyg-13-852618-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74da/8984138/c1b1a2396989/fpsyg-13-852618-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74da/8984138/1cef31ea35e9/fpsyg-13-852618-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Non-verbal Maternal Care of Male and Female Infants in India and the United Kingdom: The Parent-Infant Caregiving Touch Scale in Two Cultures.印度和英国男女婴儿非言语母婴护理比较:两种文化中的母婴护理触摸量表
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:852618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852618. eCollection 2022.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Parent-Infant Caregiving Touch Scale.母婴照料性触摸量表的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 15;6:1887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01887. eCollection 2015.
3
Exploring maternal touch in the infant's first 18 months of Life: A study on an Italian sample.探索婴儿生命的头 18 个月中的母婴触摸:对意大利样本的研究。
Infant Behav Dev. 2023 May;71:101836. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101836. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
4
Maternal antenatal anxiety, postnatal stroking and emotional problems in children: outcomes predicted from pre- and postnatal programming hypotheses.母亲产前焦虑、产后抚摸与儿童情绪问题:基于产前和产后编程假说预测的结果
Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(2):269-83. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001342. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
Does touch matter? The impact of stroking versus non-stroking maternal touch on cardio-respiratory processes in mothers and infants.触摸重要吗?抚摸与非抚摸的母亲触摸对母婴心血管呼吸过程的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Aug 1;207:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.04.024. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Stroking in early mother-infant exchanges: The role of maternal tactile biography and interoceptive sensibility.早期母婴互动中的抚触:母亲触觉传记和本体感受敏感性的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0298733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298733. eCollection 2024.
8
Affective and non-affective touch evoke differential brain responses in 2-month-old infants.情感和非情感触摸会引起 2 个月大婴儿大脑的不同反应。
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.024. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Prenatal anxiety, maternal stroking in infancy, and symptoms of emotional and behavioral disorders at 3.5 years.产前焦虑、婴儿期母亲的抚摸与3.5岁时的情绪和行为障碍症状
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;26(3):325-334. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0886-6. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
Gentle as a mother's touch: C-tactile touch promotes autonomic regulation in preterm infants.温柔如母亲的触摸:C 触觉触摸促进早产儿的自主调节。
Physiol Behav. 2022 Dec 1;257:113991. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113991. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Annual Research Review: Cross-cultural similarities and differences in parenting.年度研究综述:育儿的跨文化相似与差异。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;63(4):466-479. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13539. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
Prevalence and perceptions of infant massage in India: study from Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh states.印度婴儿按摩的普及率及认知情况:来自马哈拉施特拉邦和中央邦的研究
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02416-y.
3
Gender Discrimination and Excess Female Under-5 Mortality in India: A New Perspective Using Mixed-Sex Twins.
印度的性别歧视与 5 岁以下女童超额死亡率:利用混合性别双胞胎的新视角。
Demography. 2020 Dec;57(6):2143-2167. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00909-0.
4
Is prenatal sex selection associated with lower female child mortality?产前性别选择与女童死亡率较低有关吗?
Popul Stud (Camb). 2019 Mar;73(1):57-78. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2018.1442583. Epub 2018 May 25.
5
Sense and Sensitivity: A Response to the Commentary by Keller et al. (2018).感性与理性:对凯勒等人(2018 年)评论的回应。
Child Dev. 2018 Sep;89(5):1929-1931. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13030. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
6
The Myth of Universal Sensitive Responsiveness: Comment on Mesman et al. (2017).普遍敏感反应的神话:对 Mesman 等人(2017 年)的评论。
Child Dev. 2018 Sep;89(5):1921-1928. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13031. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
7
Increase in Oxytocin From Skin-to-Skin Contact Enhances Development of Parent-Infant Relationship.皮肤接触引起的催产素增加促进母婴关系发展。
Biol Res Nurs. 2018 Jan;20(1):54-62. doi: 10.1177/1099800417735633. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
8
The relation between early mother-infant skin-to-skin contact and later maternal sensitivity in South African mothers of low birth weight infants.南非低体重儿母亲早期母婴皮肤接触与后期母亲敏感性之间的关系。
Infant Ment Health J. 2010 May;31(3):358-377. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20260.
9
Perceived Discrimination Experienced by Physician Mothers and Desired Workplace Changes: A Cross-sectional Survey.医生母亲所经历的感知歧视和期望的工作场所变化:一项横断面调查。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):1033-1036. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1394.
10
Universality Without Uniformity: A Culturally Inclusive Approach to Sensitive Responsiveness in Infant Caregiving.普遍性与一致性:婴儿照护中敏感回应的文化包容性方法。
Child Dev. 2018 May;89(3):837-850. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12795. Epub 2017 Apr 4.