Gatchel R J, Gaffney F A, Smith J E
J Behav Med. 1986 Oct;9(5):503-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00845136.
The present study compared the relative efficacy of a behavioral stress-management procedure versus a pharmacologic method (the beta-blocker propranolol) in reducing psychophysiological reactivity in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. A pretreatment-posttreatment assessment design was used, with 10 patients participating in six separate sessions. The first session involved evaluating psychophysiological reactivity to an emotional stressor (a public-speaking task). The subsequent five sessions involved the administration of the respective treatments, either stress management or drug. The patients were randomly assigned to each treatment group. The public-speaking stressor was readministered after the last treatment session. Results demonstrated that behavioral stress management reduced psychophysiological reactivity to public speaking to the same level seen with propranolol. The findings suggest that this nonpharmacological approach could be of use when beta-blocker therapy is not desired, not practical, or medically contraindicated.
本研究比较了行为应激管理程序与药物治疗方法(β受体阻滞剂普萘洛尔)在降低心肌梗死后(MI)患者心理生理反应性方面的相对疗效。采用治疗前-治疗后评估设计,10名患者参加了6次单独的疗程。第一次疗程涉及评估对情绪应激源(公开演讲任务)的心理生理反应。随后的5个疗程涉及给予相应的治疗,即应激管理或药物治疗。患者被随机分配到每个治疗组。在最后一次治疗疗程后再次进行公开演讲应激源测试。结果表明,行为应激管理将对公开演讲的心理生理反应降低到了与普萘洛尔相同的水平。研究结果表明,当不希望、不实际或存在医学禁忌使用β受体阻滞剂治疗时,这种非药物方法可能会有用。