• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《护士信任量表》简体中文版的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of the Trust in Nurses Scale.

机构信息

Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.

Sanming First Hospital and First Hospital of Sanming Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Sanming, China.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2022 Jul;30(5):1366-1375. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13623. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1111/jonm.13623
PMID:35403295
Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to translate and validate the Trust in Nurses Scale (TINS) and then test and implement the tool.

BACKGROUND

Trust is the core feature of the nurse-patient relationship, and a simple and universal instrument to measure patients' trust in nurses in China is lacking.

METHODS

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) were performed to verify structural validity. Content validity and reliability analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha of the TINS was .817, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .852. EFA revealed two factors and explained 59.702% of the total variation. CFA proved that all the goodness-of-fit indicators were acceptable.

CONCLUSION

The TINS exhibited satisfactory reliability and validity, and it can be universally applied to survey Chinese patients' trust in nurses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

The TINS can be used by nursing managers to assess patients' trust in nurses, and appropriate programmes can be developed to improve patients' trust.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在翻译和验证信任护士量表(TINS),并对其进行测试和实施。

背景

信任是护患关系的核心特征,而中国缺乏一种简单且通用的工具来衡量患者对护士的信任。

方法

采用探索性和验证性因子分析(EFA 和 CFA)验证结构效度,同时进行内容效度和信度分析。

结果

TINS 的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为.817,重测信度系数为.852。EFA 揭示了两个因素,解释了总变异的 59.702%。CFA 证明所有拟合度指标均可接受。

结论

TINS 具有良好的信度和效度,可广泛应用于调查中国患者对护士的信任。

对护理管理的意义

护理管理者可以使用 TINS 评估患者对护士的信任,制定相应计划以提高患者的信任度。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of the Trust in Nurses Scale.《护士信任量表》简体中文版的信度和效度。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Jul;30(5):1366-1375. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13623. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Translation and validation of the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoLS-2) in a nursing cohort.工作相关生活质量量表(WRQoLS-2)在护理队列中的翻译和验证。
Contemp Nurse. 2022 Oct-Dec;58(5-6):435-445. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2022.2147849. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
3
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses.护士信息安全态度问卷中文版的信度和效度。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jun;11(6):e2203. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2203.
4
Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): assessment of reliability and validity.护生对教师关怀感知量表中文版(C-NSPIC):信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Dec;33(12):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
Reliability and validity evaluation of the chinese revision of the attitude towards adult vaccination scale.成人疫苗接种态度量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 12;23(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15684-x.
6
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the spiritual health scale.精神健康量表中文版的信度和效度。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;11(3):1058-1067. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-188.
7
Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.信任护士量表:结构效度和内部信度评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the hospital-acquired insomnia scale (HAIS) and analysis of influencing factors.医院获得性失眠量表(HAIS)中文版的心理测量学评价及影响因素分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 17;24(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06160-w.
9
The Chinese version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN): Assessment of reliability and validity.《护生专业态度量表》中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
10
Development and validation of two versions of the Nurse-Patient Mutuality in Chronic Illness scale.开发并验证慢性疾病护患互信量表的两个版本。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Aug;79(8):3170-3182. doi: 10.1111/jan.15594. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the dry eye-related quality-of-life score questionnaire.干眼症相关生活质量评分问卷中文版的心理测量学验证
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 18;17(9):1614-1620. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.09.06. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychometric properties of the post-stroke depression scale in the sequelae stage.脑卒中后遗症期抑郁量表的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 31;14:1130497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130497. eCollection 2023.