• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向更好地理解社区居住的老年人的安全感和保障感。以友好老年城市海牙为例。

Towards a Better Understanding of the Sense of Safety and Security of Community-Dwelling Older Adults. The Case of the Age-Friendly City of The Hague.

机构信息

Research Group of Urban Ageing, Centre of Expertise Health Innovation, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, Johanna Westerdijkplein 75, 2521 EN Den Haag, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Social Work & Education, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, Johanna Westerdijkplein 75, 2521 EN Den Haag, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;19(7):3960. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073960.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19073960
PMID:35409643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8997810/
Abstract

The sense of safety and security of older people is a widely acknowledged action domain for policy and practice in age-friendly cities. Despite an extensive body of knowledge on the matter, the theory is fragmented, and a classification is lacking. Therefore, this study investigated how older people experience the sense of safety and security in an age-friendly city. A total of four focus group sessions were organised in The Hague comprising 38 older people. Based on the outcomes of the sessions, the sense of safety and security was classified into two main domains: a sense of safety and security impacted by intentional acts and negligence (for instance, burglary and violence), and a sense of safety and security impacted by non-intentional acts (for instance, incidents, making mistakes online). Both domains manifest into three separate contexts, namely the home environment, the outdoor environment and traffic and the digital environment. In the discussions with older people on these derived domains, ideas for potential improvements and priorities were also explored, which included access to information on what older people can do themselves to improve their sense of safety and security, the enforcement of rules, and continuous efforts to develop digital skills to improve safety online.

摘要

老年人的安全感和安全保障是建设友好型城市的政策和实践中公认的重要领域。尽管在这方面已经有了广泛的知识体系,但理论仍然是零散的,缺乏分类。因此,本研究调查了老年人在友好型城市中是如何体验安全感和安全保障的。在海牙共组织了四次包含 38 名老年人的焦点小组会议。根据会议的结果,安全感和安全保障被分为两个主要领域:一是由故意行为和疏忽(如盗窃和暴力)影响的安全感和安全保障;二是由非故意行为(如事故、网上犯错)影响的安全感和安全保障。这两个领域都表现为三个不同的方面,即家庭环境、户外环境和交通以及数字环境。在与老年人讨论这些衍生领域时,还探讨了潜在的改进和优先事项,包括提供有关老年人可以自己采取哪些措施来提高安全感和安全保障的信息、执行规则以及不断努力提高数字技能以提高在线安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4161/8997810/917b32d519cc/ijerph-19-03960-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4161/8997810/b1359d9ba25e/ijerph-19-03960-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4161/8997810/917b32d519cc/ijerph-19-03960-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4161/8997810/b1359d9ba25e/ijerph-19-03960-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4161/8997810/917b32d519cc/ijerph-19-03960-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards a Better Understanding of the Sense of Safety and Security of Community-Dwelling Older Adults. The Case of the Age-Friendly City of The Hague.迈向更好地理解社区居住的老年人的安全感和保障感。以友好老年城市海牙为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;19(7):3960. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073960.
2
Experiences of Older People and Social Inclusion in Relation to Smart "Age-Friendly" Cities: A Case Study of Chongqing, China.老年人的体验与社会包容在智能“宜居”城市方面的关系:以中国重庆为例的一项案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 13;9:779913. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.779913. eCollection 2021.
3
A multi-year quantitative study of the experienced age-friendliness in The Hague: A tale of four personas.一项针对海牙体验友好老龄化的多年量化研究:四个角色的故事。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116362. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116362. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
4
Age-Friendly Cities During a Global Pandemic.全球大流行期间的友好型城市。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Dec 1;46(12):7-13. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20201106-02.
5
Exploring the role of smart cities in supporting ageing-in-place in Chongqing, China.探索智慧城市在中国重庆支持就地养老中的作用。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Jun;43(2):264-270. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13301. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
6
Factors influencing community-dwelling older adults' readiness to adopt smart home technology: A qualitative exploratory study.影响社区居住的老年人采用智能家居技术准备度的因素:一项定性探索性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Dec;77(12):4847-4861. doi: 10.1111/jan.14996. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
A Scoping Review of Psychological Sense of Community among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.社区居住老年人心理社区感的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 9;19(14):8395. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148395.
8
Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities.将数字、社会和物理层相结合,打造友好型老年城市和社区。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;18(1):325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010325.
9
The Contribution of Sense of Community to the Association Between Age-Friendly Built Environment and Health in a High-Density City: A Cross-Sectional Study of Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Hong Kong.社区感对高密度城市友好型建成环境与健康之间关联的贡献:对香港中年和老年人的一项横断面研究。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Dec;40(12):1687-1696. doi: 10.1177/0733464821991298. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
10
Trust and easy access to home care staff are associated with older adults' sense of security: a Swedish longitudinal study.信任和方便获得家庭护理人员与老年人的安全感相关:一项瑞典纵向研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2025 May;53(3):250-257. doi: 10.1177/14034948241236830. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Feeling safe in the context of digitalization in healthcare: a scoping review.数字化医疗背景下的安全感:综述研究。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 8;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02465-9.
2
Older Adults' Experiences, Worries and Preventive Measures Regarding Home Hazards: A Survey on Home Safety in Sweden.老年人对居家隐患的体验、担忧和预防措施:瑞典的居家安全调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021458.

本文引用的文献

1
How Older People Experience the Age-Friendliness of Their City: Development of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire.老年人如何体验城市的宜居性:宜居城市和社区问卷的制定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 20;17(18):6867. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186867.
2
"Who Doesn't Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?" A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO's Age-Friendly Cities Model.“在为老年人设计城市环境时,谁会不考虑技术?”对世界卫生组织《宜居城市》模型的拟议扩展的案例研究方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;16(19):3525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193525.
3
The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe.
《城市老龄化的挑战:使欧洲城市更适合老年人居住》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 5;15(11):2473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112473.
4
How older people as pedestrians perceive the outdoor environment - methodological issues derived from studies in two European countries.老年人作为行人如何感知户外环境——来自两个欧洲国家研究的方法学问题。
Ageing Soc. 2018 Dec;38(12):2435-2467. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X17000666. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Developing indicators for evaluation of age-friendly communities in Canada: process and results.制定加拿大老年友好社区评估指标:过程和结果。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Oct;36(10):214-223. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.10.02.
6
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: client and family caregiver perspectives.居家护理中安全问题的类型与模式:客户及家庭照顾者的观点
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Apr;28(2):214-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw006. Epub 2016 Jan 31.
7
Safety in home care: thinking outside the hospital box.居家护理中的安全:跳出医院思维定式
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:68-72. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.22838.
8
Types and patterns of safety concerns in home care: staff perspectives.家庭护理中的安全问题的类型和模式:工作人员的观点。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):525-31. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs047. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
The human factors of home health care: a conceptual model for examining safety and quality concerns.家庭医疗保健中的人为因素:考察安全和质量问题的概念模型。
J Patient Saf. 2009 Dec;5(4):229-36. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181bd1c2a.
10
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.COSMIN 清单用于评估健康状况测量仪器测量性能研究的方法学质量:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.