• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小麦、玉米和稻米国际贸易中稀缺虚拟水的得失。

Savings and Losses of Scarce Virtual Water in the International Trade of Wheat, Maize, and Rice.

机构信息

International College Beijing, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.

College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4119. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074119.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19074119
PMID:35409802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8998192/
Abstract

The international cereal trade can mitigate global water stress by saving virtual scarce water (VSW). Based on bilateral trade data, this study assessed VSW savings and losses in the international trade of three major cereals (i.e., wheat, maize, and rice) from 2008 to 2017 by incorporating the water stress index (WSI) into a virtual water assessment. We found that the trade in wheat and maize saved a significant amount of VSW, while the rice trade led to increasingly severe losses of VSW. This study identified the top trades of VSW savings and losses for each cereal. Wheat and maize were primarily exported from the countries that are relatively abundant in water resources (e.g., United States, Brazil, Argentina, Russia) to water-scarce countries (e.g., Mexico and Egypt), whereas rice was exported mainly from India and Pakistan, two of the most water-stressed countries. We suggest that policy makers consider VSW savings and losses when making cereal trading decisions to alleviate global water stress.

摘要

国际谷物贸易可以通过节约虚拟稀缺水资源(VSW)来缓解全球水资源压力。本研究基于双边贸易数据,通过将水资源压力指数(WSI)纳入虚拟水评估,评估了 2008 年至 2017 年三种主要谷物(小麦、玉米和水稻)国际贸易中的 VSW 节约和损失。结果发现,小麦和玉米的贸易节约了大量的 VSW,而水稻贸易导致 VSW 的损失越来越严重。本研究确定了每种谷物 VSW 节约和损失的主要贸易。小麦和玉米主要由水资源相对丰富的国家(如美国、巴西、阿根廷、俄罗斯)出口到水资源短缺的国家(如墨西哥和埃及),而水稻主要由水资源压力最大的两个国家印度和巴基斯坦出口。我们建议决策者在做出谷物贸易决策时,考虑 VSW 的节约和损失,以缓解全球水资源压力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/369af3830ddf/ijerph-19-04119-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/65197c6361bb/ijerph-19-04119-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/a9462b36631e/ijerph-19-04119-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/4499661d432b/ijerph-19-04119-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/7eab68b5a325/ijerph-19-04119-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/369af3830ddf/ijerph-19-04119-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/65197c6361bb/ijerph-19-04119-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/a9462b36631e/ijerph-19-04119-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/4499661d432b/ijerph-19-04119-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/7eab68b5a325/ijerph-19-04119-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76e/8998192/369af3830ddf/ijerph-19-04119-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Savings and Losses of Scarce Virtual Water in the International Trade of Wheat, Maize, and Rice.小麦、玉米和稻米国际贸易中稀缺虚拟水的得失。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4119. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074119.
2
Virtual water transfers in Africa: Assessing topical condition of water scarcity, water savings, and policy implications.非洲虚拟水转移:评估水资源短缺、节水现状和政策影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 20;835:155343. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155343. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
The virtual water content of major grain crops and virtual water flows between regions in China.中国主要粮食作物的虚拟水含量和区域间的虚拟水流动。
J Sci Food Agric. 2013 Apr;93(6):1427-37. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5911. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
4
Optimal allocation of physical water resources integrated with virtual water trade in water scarce regions: A case study for Beijing, China.缺水地区物质水资源与虚拟水贸易的优化配置:以中国北京为例。
Water Res. 2018 Feb 1;129:264-276. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.036. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
"More crop per drop": Exploring India's cereal water use since 2005.“每滴水多产一克粮”:2005 年以来印度粮食作物耗水分析
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 10;673:207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.304. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
6
Water resources transfers through Chinese interprovincial and foreign food trade.水资源通过中国省际间和中外粮食贸易转移。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 8;111(27):9774-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404749111. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
7
Virtual water flows in the international trade of agricultural products of China.中国农产品国际贸易中的虚拟水流动。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jul 1;557-558:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.166. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
How far are we from possible ideal virtual water transfer? Evidence from assessing vulnerability of global virtual water trade.我们离可能的理想虚拟水调水还有多远?评估全球虚拟水贸易脆弱性的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 1;828:154493. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154493. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
9
Assessing the impact of food trade centric on land, water, and food security in South Korea.评估以粮食贸易为中心对韩国土地、水和粮食安全的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Apr 15;332:117319. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117319. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
10
Virtual Water Scarcity Risk to the Global Trade System.虚拟水稀缺对全球贸易体系的风险。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jan 16;52(2):673-683. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04309. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Global water stress mitigation achieved through international crop trade.通过国际作物贸易实现全球水资源压力缓解。
iScience. 2025 Jun 13;28(7):112896. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112896. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.
2
Global food trade alleviates transgressions of planetary boundaries at the national scale.全球粮食贸易在国家层面减轻了对地球边界的侵犯。
iScience. 2023 Aug 30;26(10):107794. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107794. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
3
Understanding Global Rice Trade Flows: Network Evolution and Implications.了解全球大米贸易流动:网络演变及其影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Trade of economically and physically scarce virtual water in the global food network.全球粮食网络中具有经济和物理稀缺性的虚拟水贸易。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 23;11(1):22806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01514-w.
2
Income impacts on household consumption's grey water footprint in China.中国家庭消费的灰色水足迹对收入的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 1):142584. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142584. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
Water footprint of German agricultural imports: Local impacts due to global trade flows in a fifteen-year perspective.
Foods. 2023 Sep 2;12(17):3298. doi: 10.3390/foods12173298.
4
Invisible Effect of Virtual Water Transfer on Water Quantity Conflict in Transboundary Rivers-Taking Ili River as a Case.虚拟水调水的无形效应对跨界河流水量冲突的影响——以伊犁河为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8917. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158917.
德国农业进口的水足迹:十五年全球贸易流动中的地方影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 20;662:521-529. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.264. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
4
Water resources conservation and nitrogen pollution reduction under global food trade and agricultural intensification.全球粮食贸易和农业集约化下的水资源保护和氮污染减排。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Aug 15;633:1591-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.306. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Intra-EU agricultural trade, virtual water flows and policy implications.欧盟内部农业贸易、虚拟水流动及其政策影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jun 1;587-588:439-448. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.105.
6
Evolution of the global virtual water trade network.全球虚拟水贸易网络的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 17;109(16):5989-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203176109. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
7
The water footprint of humanity.人类的水足迹。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3232-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109936109. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
8
Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA.评估生命周期评价中淡水消耗的环境影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jun 1;43(11):4098-104. doi: 10.1021/es802423e.
9
Virtual water trade and world water resources.虚拟水贸易与世界水资源
Water Sci Technol. 2004;49(7):203-9.