• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英雄所见略同?当受更准确信息引导时,空间搜索过程可能更具个体差异。

Great Minds Think Alike? Spatial Search Processes Can Be More Idiosyncratic When Guided by More Accurate Information.

机构信息

School of Business and Law, Universitetet i Agder.

Wroclaw Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2022 Apr;46(4):e13132. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13132.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.13132
PMID:35411964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9286361/
Abstract

Existing research demonstrates that pre-decisional information sampling strategies are often stable within a given person while varying greatly across people. However, it remains largely unknown what drives these individual differences, that is, why in some circumstances we collect information more idiosyncratically. In this brief report, we present a pre-registered online study of spatial search. Using a novel technique that combines machine-learning dimension reduction and sequence alignment algorithms, we quantify the extent to which the shape and temporal properties of a search trajectory are idiosyncratic. We show that this metric increases (trajectories become more idiosyncratic) when a person is better informed about the likely location of the search target, while poorly informed individuals seem more likely to resort to default search routines determined bottom-up by the properties of the search field. This shows that when many people independently attempt to solve a task in a similar way, they are not necessarily "onto something."

摘要

现有研究表明,在给定的个体中,决策前信息采样策略往往是稳定的,而在不同个体之间则有很大的差异。然而,这些个体差异的驱动因素在很大程度上仍不清楚,也就是说,为什么在某些情况下我们会更独特地收集信息。在本简要报告中,我们展示了一项关于空间搜索的预先注册在线研究。我们使用一种新的技术,结合机器学习降维和序列对齐算法,量化了搜索轨迹的形状和时间特性的独特程度。我们表明,当一个人对搜索目标的可能位置有更好的了解时,这个度量值会增加(轨迹变得更加独特),而信息不足的个体似乎更有可能依赖于由搜索场的属性决定的默认搜索例程。这表明,当许多人以类似的方式独立尝试解决任务时,他们并不一定“有头绪”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9286361/be26fbfbc627/COGS-46-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9286361/1d763a2867f4/COGS-46-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9286361/fe16ee71fbfb/COGS-46-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9286361/be26fbfbc627/COGS-46-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9286361/1d763a2867f4/COGS-46-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9286361/fe16ee71fbfb/COGS-46-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c864/9286361/be26fbfbc627/COGS-46-0-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Great Minds Think Alike? Spatial Search Processes Can Be More Idiosyncratic When Guided by More Accurate Information.英雄所见略同?当受更准确信息引导时,空间搜索过程可能更具个体差异。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Apr;46(4):e13132. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13132.
2
Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.前额叶皮层中独特的表征相似性模式可预测注意力表现。
J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1257-1268. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1407-16.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.通过空间统计分心物学习揭示了两个层次优先级计算中的显着性信号的调制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):710-728. doi: 10.1037/xge0000970. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
4
Cue-guided search: a computational model of selective attention.线索引导搜索:选择性注意的一种计算模型。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2005 Jul;16(4):910-24. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2005.851787.
5
Visual search: bottom-up or top-down?视觉搜索:自下而上还是自上而下?
Front Biosci. 2000 Jan 1;5:D169-93. doi: 10.2741/A503.
6
Sources of top-down control in visual search.视觉搜索中自上而下控制的来源。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Nov;21(11):2100-13. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21173.
7
Functional connectivity at rest captures individual differences in visual search.静息态功能连接可捕捉视觉搜索的个体差异。
Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Mar;225(2):537-549. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-02008-2. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
8
Visual Search: You Are Who You Are (+ A Learning Curve).视觉搜索:你就是你自己(+一条学习曲线)。
Perception. 2017 Dec;46(12):1434-1441. doi: 10.1177/0301006617721091. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
Event-related Electroencephalographic Lateralizations Mark Individual Differences in Spatial and Nonspatial Visual Selection.事件相关脑电的侧化标志着空间和非空间视觉选择的个体差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Apr;30(4):482-497. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01221. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
Playing shooter and driving videogames improves top-down guidance in visual search.玩射击和驾驶类电子游戏可改善视觉搜索中的自上而下引导。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 May;75(4):673-86. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0440-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Eye movement anomalies as a source of diagnostic information in decision process analysis.眼动异常作为决策过程分析中诊断信息的来源。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jun;47(6):1012-1026. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000931. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Prior target locations attract overt attention during search.先前的目标位置在搜索过程中会引起过度注意。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104282. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104282. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
Computational noise in reward-guided learning drives behavioral variability in volatile environments.
奖励导向学习中的计算噪声驱动易变环境中的行为可变性。
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Dec;22(12):2066-2077. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0518-9. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
The relationship between gaze behavior, expertise, and performance: A systematic review.注视行为、专业知识与表现之间的关系:系统综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Oct;145(10):980-1027. doi: 10.1037/bul0000207. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
5
Performance in a Collaborative Search Task: The Role of Feedback and Alignment.协作搜索任务中的表现:反馈和一致性的作用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;10(1):55-79. doi: 10.1111/tops.12300. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Scanpath modeling and classification with hidden Markov models.使用隐马尔可夫模型进行扫视轨迹建模和分类。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):362-379. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0876-8.
7
Individual differences in human eye movements: An oculomotor signature?人类眼动的个体差异:一种动眼特征?
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:157-169. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Perceiving crowd attention: Gaze following in human crowds with conflicting cues.感知群体注意力:在存在冲突线索的人群中追随目光。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1039-1049. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1303-z.
9
Spatial memory in foraging games.觅食游戏中的空间记忆。
Cognition. 2016 Mar;148:85-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
10
Perceiving crowd attention: ensemble perception of a crowd's gaze.感知群体注意力:对群体注视的整体感知
Psychol Sci. 2014 Oct;25(10):1903-13. doi: 10.1177/0956797614544510. Epub 2014 Aug 14.