• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过使用智能辅助技术增强痴呆症患者的能力:一项范围综述

Empowering people with dementia via using intelligent assistive technology: A scoping review.

作者信息

Löbe Clara, AboJabel Hanan

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jul-Aug;101:104699. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104699. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2022.104699
PMID:35413610
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Over the past decade, the idea has been promoted that intelligent assistive technology (IAT) can empower people with dementia. As a new area of inquiry, however, the concept of empowerment and the impact of IAT in this context are still unclear. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to examine the conceptualizing and measuring of empowerment, as well as to understand the impact of IAT on empowering people with dementia in the existing studies.

DESIGN

A scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, using the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Science Direct. In addition, a manual search was also conducted in Google Scholar to identify further articles.

RESULTS

A total of 28 articles examining the empowerment of people with dementia via IAT met the inclusion criteria. Most had a cross-sectional (43%) or interventional/experimental design (39%). A little more than half (54%) were qualitative studies. We observed inconsistencies in the conceptualization and measurement of the concept of empowerment in the included studies; as such, the exact role of IAT in this context remains somewhat unclear. However, most of the studies suggest that IAT can empower people with mild/moderate dementia by enhancing their capacity to live more independently with privacy for a longer period of time.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should focus on developing a clear definition of the concept of empowerment, as well as developing a reliable and valid tool for measuring it.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,智能辅助技术(IAT)能够增强痴呆症患者能力的观点得到了推广。然而,作为一个新的研究领域,赋权的概念以及IAT在这方面的影响仍不明确。因此,我们进行了一项范围综述,以研究赋权的概念化和衡量方法,并了解在现有研究中IAT对增强痴呆症患者能力的影响。

设计

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行范围综述,使用以下数据库:PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和科学Direct。此外,还在谷歌学术上进行了手动搜索,以识别更多文章。

结果

共有28篇研究通过IAT增强痴呆症患者能力的文章符合纳入标准。大多数研究采用横断面设计(43%)或干预/实验设计(39%)。略超过一半(54%)的研究为定性研究。我们观察到纳入研究中赋权概念的概念化和衡量存在不一致;因此,IAT在这方面的确切作用仍然有些不明确。然而,大多数研究表明,IAT可以通过提高轻度/中度痴呆症患者在更长时间内更独立且私密地生活的能力,来增强他们的能力。

结论

未来的研究应专注于为赋权概念制定明确的定义,并开发一种可靠且有效的衡量工具。

相似文献

1
Empowering people with dementia via using intelligent assistive technology: A scoping review.通过使用智能辅助技术增强痴呆症患者的能力:一项范围综述
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jul-Aug;101:104699. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104699. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
Between empowerment, patronization, and surveillance. A semi-structured interview study with persons with dementia and family caregivers on the empowering opportunities and perils of intelligent assistive technologies.介于赋权、施惠与监督之间。一项针对痴呆症患者及其家庭照料者开展的关于智能辅助技术的赋权机遇与风险的半结构化访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 5;26(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01203-7.
3
Cross-cultural perspectives on intelligent assistive technology in dementia care: comparing Israeli and German experts' attitudes.跨文化视角下痴呆症护理中的智能辅助技术:比较以色列和德国专家的态度。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Feb 7;25(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01010-6.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Assistive technology for memory support in dementia.用于痴呆症记忆支持的辅助技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD009627. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009627.pub2.
7
Assistive Technology to Support Dementia Management: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Reviews.辅助技术支持痴呆症管理:综述的范围综述方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 11;13:e57036. doi: 10.2196/57036.
8
Impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia: protocol for a scoping review.数字辅助技术对痴呆症患者生活质量的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 13;13(12):e077017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077017.
9
Exploring the Landscape of Standards and Guidelines in AgeTech Design and Development: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.探索老龄化科技设计与开发中的标准和指南景观:范围综述和主题分析。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Oct 31;7:e58196. doi: 10.2196/58196.
10
Intelligent Robot Interventions for People With Dementia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.针对痴呆症患者的智能机器人干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e59892. doi: 10.2196/59892.

引用本文的文献

1
Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.用于预防阿尔茨海默病的移动健康应用程序尚未解决的伦理问题。
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep;28(3):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Attitudes of Arab Family Caregivers in Israel Toward Robot-Delivered Care For ADL-Dependent (Activities of Daily Living-Dependent) Older People: Identifying Ethical and Social Issues.以色列阿拉伯家庭照顾者对为日常生活依赖型老年人提供机器人护理的态度:识别伦理和社会问题。
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10414-3.
3
Between empowerment, patronization, and surveillance. A semi-structured interview study with persons with dementia and family caregivers on the empowering opportunities and perils of intelligent assistive technologies.
介于赋权、施惠与监督之间。一项针对痴呆症患者及其家庭照料者开展的关于智能辅助技术的赋权机遇与风险的半结构化访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 5;26(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01203-7.
4
Empowerment in structures. Practical-ethical considerations of the preconditions for technology-assisted dementia care in Germany based on an expert-interview study.结构中的赋权。基于专家访谈研究对德国技术辅助痴呆症护理前提条件的实践伦理考量。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 10;15:1437967. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437967. eCollection 2024.
5
Barriers and facilitators to participation in electronic health interventions in older adults with cognitive impairment: an umbrella review.认知障碍老年人参与电子健康干预的障碍与促进因素:一项伞状综述
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05645-3.
6
Impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia: a scoping review.数字辅助技术对痴呆症患者生活质量的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 10;14(2):e080545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080545.
7
Cross-cultural perspectives on intelligent assistive technology in dementia care: comparing Israeli and German experts' attitudes.跨文化视角下痴呆症护理中的智能辅助技术:比较以色列和德国专家的态度。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Feb 7;25(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01010-6.
8
AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies.人工智能辅助伦理?关于用于辅助技术伦理评估与设计的人工智能模拟的思考。
Front Genet. 2023 Jun 26;14:1039839. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839. eCollection 2023.