• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用硝化抑制剂和深施技术应对全球农田中氨(NH)和氧化亚氮(N₂O)排放之间的权衡。

Using nitrification inhibitors and deep placement to tackle the trade-offs between NH and N O emissions in global croplands.

作者信息

Zhang Chong, Song Xiaotong, Zhang Yaqian, Wang Dan, Rees Robert M, Ju Xiaotang

机构信息

College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, China.

State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jul;28(14):4409-4422. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16198. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.16198
PMID:35429205
Abstract

Ammonia (NH ) and nitrous oxide (N O) are two important air pollutants that have major impacts on climate change and biodiversity losses. Agriculture represents their largest source and effective mitigation measures of individual gases have been well studied. However, the interactions and trade-offs between NH and N O emissions remain uncertain. Here, we report the results of a two-year field experiment in a wheat-maize rotation in the North China Plain (NCP), a global hotspot of reactive N emissions. Our analysis is supported by a literature synthesis of global croplands, to understand the interactions between NH and N O emissions and to develop the most effective approaches to jointly mitigate NH and N O emissions. Field results indicated that deep placement of urea with nitrification inhibitors (NIs) reduced both emissions of NH by 67% to 90% and N O by 73% to 100%, respectively, in comparison with surface broadcast urea which is the common farmers' practice. But, deep placement of urea, surface broadcast urea with NIs, and application of urea with urease inhibitors probably led to trade-offs between the two gases, with a mitigation potential of -201% to 101% for NH and -112% to 89% for N O. The literature synthesis showed that deep placement of urea with NIs had an emission factor of 1.53%-4.02% for NH and 0.22%-0.36% for N O, which were much lower than other fertilization regimes and the default values recommended by IPCC guidelines. This would translate to a reduction of 3.86-5.47 Tg N yr of NH and 0.41-0.50 Tg N yr of N O emissions, respectively, when adopting deep placement of urea with NIs (relative to current practice) in global croplands. We conclude that the combination of NIs and deep placement of urea can successfully tackle the trade-offs between NH and N O emissions, therefore avoiding N pollution swapping in global croplands.

摘要

氨(NH₃)和一氧化二氮(N₂O)是两种重要的空气污染物,对气候变化和生物多样性丧失有重大影响。农业是它们的最大来源,针对单一气体的有效减排措施已得到充分研究。然而,NH₃和N₂O排放之间的相互作用和权衡仍不明确。在此,我们报告了在中国华北平原(NCP)冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系中进行的为期两年的田间试验结果,华北平原是全球活性氮排放的热点地区。我们的分析得到了全球农田文献综述的支持,以了解NH₃和N₂O排放之间的相互作用,并制定联合减排NH₃和N₂O的最有效方法。田间试验结果表明,与农民常用的地表撒施尿素相比,尿素与硝化抑制剂(NIs)深施分别使NH₃排放量降低了67%至90%,N₂O排放量降低了73%至100%。但是,尿素深施、地表撒施含NIs的尿素以及施用含脲酶抑制剂的尿素可能导致两种气体之间的权衡,NH₃的减排潜力为-201%至101%,N₂O的减排潜力为-112%至89%。文献综述表明,尿素与NIs深施时,NH₃的排放因子为1.53%-4.02%,N₂O的排放因子为0.22%-0.36%,远低于其他施肥方式以及IPCC指南推荐的默认值。在全球农田中采用尿素与NIs深施(相对于当前做法),这将分别减少3.86-5.47 Tg N yr的NH₃排放和0.41-0.50 Tg N yr的N₂O排放。我们得出结论,NIs与尿素深施相结合可以成功解决NH₃和N₂O排放之间的权衡问题,从而避免全球农田中的氮污染交换。

相似文献

1
Using nitrification inhibitors and deep placement to tackle the trade-offs between NH and N O emissions in global croplands.利用硝化抑制剂和深施技术应对全球农田中氨(NH)和氧化亚氮(N₂O)排放之间的权衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jul;28(14):4409-4422. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16198. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Data-driven estimates of fertilizer-induced soil NH , NO and N O emissions from croplands in China and their climate change impacts.基于数据的中国农田肥料引起的土壤 NH 、NO 和 N O 排放估算及其对气候变化的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Feb;28(3):1008-1022. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15975. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Impacts assessment of nitrification inhibitors on U.S. agricultural emissions of reactive nitrogen gases.硝化抑制剂对美国农业活性氮气体排放的影响评估。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:121043. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121043. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Trade-offs between soil carbon sequestration and reactive nitrogen losses under straw return in global agroecosystems.全球农业生态系统中秸秆还田的土壤碳固存与活性氮损失之间的权衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec;24(12):5919-5932. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14466. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
The importance of ammonia volatilization in estimating the efficacy of nitrification inhibitors to reduce NO emissions: A global meta-analysis.氨气挥发在评估硝化抑制剂减少 NO 排放效果中的重要性:一项全球元分析。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Feb 15;271:116365. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116365. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
6
[Effects of biochar combined with nitrification/urease inhibitors on soil active nitrogen emissions from subtropical paddy soils].生物炭联合硝化/脲酶抑制剂对亚热带稻田土壤活性氮排放的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Apr;33(4):1027-1036. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202204.017.
7
Biochar application as a tool to decrease soil nitrogen losses (NH volatilization, N O emissions, and N leaching) from croplands: Options and mitigation strength in a global perspective.生物炭作为减少农田土壤氮素损失(NH 挥发、N O 排放和 N 淋失)的工具:全球视角下的选择和缓解力度。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):2077-2093. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14613. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
8
Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta-analysis and integrated assessment.缓解粪污管理链中的氨、氧化亚氮和甲烷排放:荟萃分析和综合评估。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Mar;21(3):1293-312. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12767. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
9
Biological nitrification inhibitor for reducing NO and NH emissions simultaneously under root zone fertilization in a Chinese rice field.根区施肥条件下生物硝化抑制剂同步减少中国稻田氮素挥发和淋失。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Sep;264:114821. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114821. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Response of area- and yield-scaled N O emissions from croplands to deep fertilization: a meta-analysis of soil, climate, and management factors.农田区域和产量尺度下氮氧化物排放对深施肥的响应:土壤、气候和管理因素的荟萃分析。
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Aug 30;101(11):4653-4661. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11108. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of N management optimization practices on rice productivity and N loss: a meta-analysis.氮肥管理优化措施对水稻生产力和氮素损失的影响:一项荟萃分析
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Apr 22;16:1485144. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1485144. eCollection 2025.
2
Green manure combined with reduced nitrogen reduce NH emissions, improves yield and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice.绿肥与减氮相结合可减少氨排放,提高水稻产量和氮利用效率。
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 22;12:e17761. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17761. eCollection 2024.
3
Soil Factors Key to 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate (DMPP) Efficacy: EC and SOC Dominate over Biotic Influences.
土壤因素是3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐(DMPP)功效的关键:有效阳离子交换量和土壤有机碳比生物因素的影响更显著。
Microorganisms. 2024 Aug 29;12(9):1787. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091787.
4
Impacts assessment of nitrification inhibitors on U.S. agricultural emissions of reactive nitrogen gases.硝化抑制剂对美国农业活性氮气体排放的影响评估。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:121043. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121043. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Co-application of straw incorporation and biochar addition stimulated soil N2O and NH3 productions.秸秆还田和生物炭添加的共同作用刺激了土壤 N2O 和 NH3 的产生。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 2;19(2):e0289300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289300. eCollection 2024.
6
Carbon Footprint of the Pork Product Chain and Recent Advancements in Mitigation Strategies.猪肉产品链的碳足迹及减排策略的最新进展
Foods. 2023 Nov 22;12(23):4203. doi: 10.3390/foods12234203.
7
Closing the Nutrient Loop-The New Approaches to Recovering Biomass Minerals during the Biorefinery Processes.闭环营养-The 生物炼制过程中回收生物质矿物质的新方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3):2096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032096.