Hu Zhongze, Yang Daliu, Feng Yaming, Zhang Shuanglin, Wang An, Wang Qiaozhen, Yang Yayun, Chen Chunying, Zhang Yuefang, Wang Xian
Institute of Taizhou Agricultural Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China.
Agro-Tech Extension and Service Center of Hailing District, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China.
PeerJ. 2024 Jul 22;12:e17761. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17761. eCollection 2024.
Green manure is an important source of organic fertilizer. Exploring green fertilizer and nitrogen fertilizer reduction is important for agricultural production. However, few studies have been conducted, especially on the effects of different green fertilizers along with reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on soil ammonia volatilization emissions, rice yield, and nitrogen fertilizer uptake and utilization.
In this study, the effects of different types of green manure and reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on soil ammonia volatilization emissions, aboveground population characteristics of rice, and nitrogen fertilizer uptake and utilization were explored. This study was based on a field-positioning experiment conducted between 2020 and 2022. Six treatments were established: no nitrogen fertilizer application (CK), conventional fertilization in wheat-rice (WR), villous villosa-rice (VvR), vetch sativa-rice (VsR), rapeseed seed-rice (RR), and milk vetch-rice (GR), with a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application. The amounts of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers remained unchanged. The characteristics of ammonia volatilization loss in rice fields, agronomic traits of rice, yield traits, and nitrogen uptake and utilization were investigated.
The results indicated a significant difference ( < 0.05) in the impact of different treatments on ammonia volatilization emissions from rice in the two-year experiment. Compared with WR treatment, VvR, VsR, RR, and GR treatments reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 23.58 to 39.21 kg ha, respectively. Compared with the conventional WR treatment, other treatments increased rice yield by 0.09 to 0.83 t ha. GR treatment was significantly higher than other green fertilizer treatments, except for VsR ( < 0.05). It increased the nitrogen uptake of rice by an average of 4.24%-22.24% and 13.08%-33.21% over the two years, respectively. The impact of different types of green manure on the nitrogen uptake and utilization of rice varied greatly, indicating that the combination of green manure and fertilizer is a sustainable fertilization model for crops to achieve high yields. In particular, the Chinese milk vetch as green manure was more beneficial for ammonia volatilization reduction in paddy field and stable grain production of rice.
绿肥是有机肥的重要来源。探索绿肥与减氮对农业生产具有重要意义。然而,相关研究较少,尤其是不同绿肥与减氮处理对土壤氨挥发排放、水稻产量以及氮肥吸收利用的影响。
本研究探讨了不同类型绿肥与减氮处理对土壤氨挥发排放、水稻地上部群体特征以及氮肥吸收利用的影响。该研究基于2020年至2022年进行的田间定位试验。设置了6个处理:不施氮肥(CK)、稻麦常规施肥(WR)、毛苕子-水稻(VvR)、箭筈豌豆-水稻(VsR)、油菜籽-水稻(RR)、紫云英-水稻(GR),氮肥施用量减少20%。磷钾肥用量保持不变。对稻田氨挥发损失特征、水稻农艺性状、产量性状以及氮素吸收利用情况进行了调查。
两年试验结果表明,不同处理对水稻氨挥发排放的影响存在显著差异(<0.05)。与WR处理相比,VvR、VsR、RR和GR处理分别使氨挥发总损失量减少了23.58至39.21千克/公顷。与常规WR处理相比,其他处理使水稻产量提高了0.09至0.83吨/公顷。GR处理显著高于其他绿肥处理(除VsR外,<0.05)。两年间,GR处理分别使水稻氮吸收平均提高了4.24%-22.24%和13.08%-33.21%。不同类型绿肥对水稻氮吸收利用的影响差异较大,表明绿肥与化肥配施是作物实现高产的可持续施肥模式。特别是紫云英作为绿肥更有利于稻田氨挥发减排和水稻稳产。