Agadjanian Victor, Oh Byeongdon, Menjívar Cecilia
University of California - Los Angeles (USA).
Portland State University (USA).
J Ethn Migr Stud. 2022;48(1):53-73. doi: 10.1080/1369183x.2021.1872373. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
Legal status has shown far-reaching consequences for international migrants' incorporation trajectories and outcomes in Western contexts. In dialogue with the extant research, we examine the implications of legal status for subjective well-being of Central Asian migrant women in the Russian Federation. Using survey data collected through respondent-driven sampling in two large cities, we compare migrants with regularized and irregular legal statuses on several interrelated yet distinct dimensions of subjective well-being. We find that, regardless of other factors, regularized status has a strong positive association with migrants' perception of their rights and freedoms but not with their feeling of being respected in society. Regularized status is positively associated with self-efficacy and negatively with depression. Yet, no net legal status difference is found in migrants' views on their relations with other migrants or on treatment of migrants by native-borns. The findings are situated within the cross-national scholarship on the ramifications of racialized immigrant (il)legality and its implications for membership and belonging.
在西方背景下,法律身份对国际移民的融入轨迹和结果产生了深远影响。在与现有研究的对话中,我们考察了法律身份对俄罗斯联邦中亚移民妇女主观幸福感的影响。利用通过应答驱动抽样在两个大城市收集的调查数据,我们在主观幸福感的几个相互关联但又不同的维度上,比较了具有正规和非正规法律身份的移民。我们发现,无论其他因素如何,正规身份与移民对自身权利和自由的认知有着强烈的正相关,但与他们在社会中被尊重的感觉无关。正规身份与自我效能感呈正相关,与抑郁呈负相关。然而,在移民对他们与其他移民关系的看法或本土出生者对移民的对待方式上,未发现法律身份的净差异。这些发现处于关于种族化移民(非法)身份的影响及其对成员身份和归属感的影响的跨国学术研究范围内。