Agadjanian Victor, Menjívar Cecilia, Zotova Natalya
University of Kansas.
Ohio State University.
Soc Probl. 2017 Nov 1;64(4):558-576. doi: 10.1093/socpro/spw042. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
Using data from a structured survey and in-depth interviews in three Russian cities, our study engages the scholarship on immigration legal regimes and racialization practices to examine the experiences of ethnoracially motivated harassment among working migrant women from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan in Russia. The results of statistical analyses show that regularized legal status is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of experiencing harassment at the hands of law enforcement agents and other actors alike. Regardless of legal status, however, the analyses reveal significant variations across the three migrant groups, with members of the group that is seen as racially most distinct from the host population having the highest odds of reporting harassment. The analysis of in-depth interviews confirms and expands on these patterns, providing additional insights into the complex expressions and interplay of legality and race in migrants' everyday experiences. The study findings are situated within the cross-national literature on migrants' legal and ethnoracial exclusion in receiving contexts.
利用在俄罗斯三个城市进行的结构化调查和深度访谈所获得的数据,我们的研究结合了关于移民法律制度和种族化实践的学术研究,以考察来自吉尔吉斯斯坦、塔吉克斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦的在职移民妇女在俄罗斯遭受基于种族动机骚扰的经历。统计分析结果表明,合法身份与遭受执法人员及其他人员骚扰的可能性显著降低相关。然而,无论法律身份如何,分析显示这三个移民群体存在显著差异,被视为与东道国人口在种族上差异最大的群体成员报告遭受骚扰的几率最高。对深度访谈的分析证实并扩展了这些模式,为合法性和种族在移民日常经历中的复杂表现及相互作用提供了更多见解。本研究结果置于关于移民在接收环境中法律和种族排斥的跨国文献之中。