• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估青少年社交恐惧相关解释偏差的新社会图片任务。

A New Social Picture Task to Assess Interpretation Bias related to social fears in adolescents.

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 Aug;50(8):1067-1080. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00915-3. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10802-022-00915-3
PMID:35435540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9013980/
Abstract

This pre-registered study focused on developing a new social picture task to assess interpretation bias related to social fears in adolescents. Using such a pictorial task may increase ecological validity and readily trigger emotional processes compared to more traditional verbal tasks that are often used. In the picture task, ambiguous social pictures were presented, followed by a positive and negative interpretation. In this study, we examined how the new task relates to an already existing interpretation bias task and how the new pictorial task relates to social fears in adolescents. The sample consisted of 329 adolescents aged 12 to 18 years. Interpretation bias was assessed with the newly developed pictorial task and with more traditional verbal vignettes. Social fears were measured with self-report questionnaires. The results suggest that the pictorial task was able to assess interpretation bias comparable to the verbal vignettes, suggesting appropriate convergent validity. Interpretation bias assessed with the picture task was linked to higher levels of fear of negative evaluation, the core symptom of social anxiety, but not to social anxiety symptoms in general. The verbal task was linked to both social fears and thus still seems the preferred method to investigate interpretation bias related to social fears in adolescents. However, we do believe that with further improvement of the pictorial task, it could be a useful addition to the research field.

摘要

这项预先注册的研究专注于开发一种新的社会图片任务,以评估青少年与社交恐惧相关的解释偏差。与经常使用的传统口头任务相比,使用这样的图片任务可以提高生态有效性并更容易触发情绪过程。在图片任务中,呈现了模棱两可的社会图片,然后进行正面和负面的解释。在这项研究中,我们研究了新任务与现有的解释偏差任务的关系,以及新的图片任务与青少年社交恐惧的关系。该样本由 329 名 12 至 18 岁的青少年组成。使用新开发的图片任务和更传统的口头情景来评估解释偏差。使用自我报告问卷测量社交恐惧。结果表明,图片任务能够评估与口头情景相似的解释偏差,表明具有适当的收敛效度。使用图片任务评估的解释偏差与负面评价恐惧的水平更高相关,这是社交焦虑的核心症状,但与一般的社交焦虑症状无关。口头任务与社交恐惧有关,因此似乎仍然是研究青少年社交恐惧相关解释偏差的首选方法。然而,我们确实相信,通过进一步改进图片任务,它可以成为研究领域的有用补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9185/9395440/28fc8930f42e/10802_2022_915_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9185/9395440/28fc8930f42e/10802_2022_915_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9185/9395440/28fc8930f42e/10802_2022_915_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A New Social Picture Task to Assess Interpretation Bias related to social fears in adolescents.评估青少年社交恐惧相关解释偏差的新社会图片任务。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 Aug;50(8):1067-1080. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00915-3. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Convergent, incremental, and criterion-related validity of multi-informant assessments of adolescents' fears of negative and positive evaluation.青少年对负面和正面评价的恐惧的多来源评估的会聚、增量和效标关联效度。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Mar;25(2):217-230. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2156. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
3
Examining the Effects of Stuttering and Social Anxiety on Interpretations of Ambiguous Social Scenarios Among Adolescents.考察口吃和社交焦虑对青少年解读模糊社交情境的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2022 Jan-Feb;95:106179. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106179. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
A Brief Measure of Positive and Negative Interpretation Biases: Development and Validation of the Ambiguous Social Scenarios Questionnaire.积极与消极诠释偏差的简要衡量:模糊社会情境问卷的编制与验证。
Assessment. 2024 Apr;31(3):715-731. doi: 10.1177/10731911231176275. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Interpretation bias in the face of pain: a discriminatory fear conditioning approach.面对疼痛时的解释偏差:一种歧视性恐惧条件作用方法。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Apr 24;19(2):383-395. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0112.
6
Content-Specific Interpretation Bias in Children with Varying Levels of Anxiety: The Role of Gender and Age.内容特异性焦虑水平不同的儿童的解释偏倚:性别和年龄的作用。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Oct;50(5):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00883-8.
7
Negative Interpretation Bias and the Experience of Pain in Adolescents.消极解释偏差与青少年的疼痛体验
J Pain. 2016 Sep;17(9):972-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
8
Social interpretation inflexibility moderates emotional reactions to social situations in children and adolescents.社会解释僵化调节儿童和青少年对社会情境的情绪反应。
Dev Psychopathol. 2023 Dec;35(5):2352-2364. doi: 10.1017/S0954579423000834. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
9
A Multi-Method, Multi-Informant Test of Maternal Emotion Socialization in Relation to Adolescent Fears of Social Evaluation.一项关于母亲情绪社会化与青少年社交评价恐惧关系的多方法、多信息源测试
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 Feb;50(2):177-192. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00786-0. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
10
Fear of evaluation in social anxiety: mediation of attentional bias to human faces.社交焦虑中对评价的恐惧:对人脸注意偏向的中介作用。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;45(4):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of virtual reality exposure therapy on focus of attention, self-criticism, and interpretation bias in university students with social anxiety.虚拟现实暴露疗法对社交焦虑大学生注意力焦点、自我批评及解释偏差的影响
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Sep 29;12:310. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1742_22. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk and Protective Factors for Prospective Changes in Adolescent Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间青少年心理健康未来变化的风险和保护因素。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Jan;50(1):44-57. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01332-9. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
2
Interpretation bias in social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.社交焦虑中的解释偏差:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:1119-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.121. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
3
Threat and benign interpretation bias might not be a unidimensional construct.
威胁和良性解释偏差可能不是一个单一维度的结构。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Jun;34(4):783-792. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1682973. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
4
Content-Specific Interpretation Bias in Children with Varying Levels of Anxiety: The Role of Gender and Age.内容特异性焦虑水平不同的儿童的解释偏倚:性别和年龄的作用。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Oct;50(5):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s10578-019-00883-8.
5
Multisession Cognitive Bias Modification Targeting Multiple Biases in Adolescents with Elevated Social Anxiety.针对社交焦虑水平较高的青少年的多种认知偏差进行多阶段认知偏差修正。
Cognit Ther Res. 2018;42(5):581-597. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9912-y. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
6
Research Review: Is anxiety associated with negative interpretations of ambiguity in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis.研究综述:焦虑是否与儿童和青少年对模糊性的负面解释有关?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;59(11):1127-1142. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12822. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
7
Through the eyes of a child: preschoolers' identification of emotional expressions from the child affective facial expression (CAFE) set.透过孩子的视角:学龄前儿童对儿童情感面部表情(CAFE)集中情感表情的识别。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):1122-1130. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1365046. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: A review.性别差异与社交焦虑障碍:综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;56:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
The etiology of social anxiety disorder: An evidence-based model.社交焦虑障碍的病因:基于证据的模型。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Nov;86:50-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
The aetiology and maintenance of social anxiety disorder: A synthesis of complimentary theoretical models and formulation of a new integrated model.社交焦虑障碍的病因及维持因素:互补理论模型的综合与新整合模型的构建
J Affect Disord. 2016 Oct;203:84-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.069. Epub 2016 May 31.