• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者的完全再血管化与不完全再血管化。

Angiographic complete revascularization versus incomplete revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Apr 19;21(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01488-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12933-022-01488-7
PMID:35439958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9019985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Considering the nature of diabetes mellitus (DM) in coronary artery disease, it is unclear whether complete revascularization is beneficial or not in patients with DM. We investigated the clinical impact of angiographic complete revascularization in patients with DM.

METHODS

A total of 5516 consecutive patients (2003 patients with DM) who underwent coronary stenting with 2nd generation drug-eluting stent were analyzed. Angiographic complete revascularization was defined as a residual SYNTAX (SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery) score of 0. The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO, including all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization) and target lesion failure (TLF) at three years were analyzed.

RESULTS

Complete revascularization was associated with a reduced risk of POCO in DM population [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.93, p = 0.016], but not in non-DM population (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69-1.17, p = 0.423). The risk of TLF was comparable between the complete and incomplete revascularization groups in both DM (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49-1.16, p = 0.195) and non-DM populations (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75-1.63, p = 0.611). The independent predictors of POCO were incomplete revascularization, multivessel disease, left main disease and low ejection fraction in the DM population, and old age, peripheral vessel disease, and low ejection fraction in the non-DM population.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical benefit of angiographic complete revascularization is more prominent in patients with DM than those without DM after three years of follow-up. Relieving residual disease might be more critical in the DM population than the non-DM population. Trial registration The Grand Drug-Eluting Stent registry NCT03507205.

摘要

背景

考虑到糖尿病合并冠心病的性质,在糖尿病患者中,完全血运重建是否有益尚不清楚。我们研究了糖尿病患者接受血管造影完全血运重建的临床影响。

方法

共分析了 5516 例连续接受第二代药物洗脱支架冠状动脉支架置入术的患者(2003 例糖尿病患者)。血管造影完全血运重建定义为残余 SYNTAX(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术的协同作用)评分 0 分。分析了 3 年时的患者导向复合终点(POCO,包括全因死亡、任何心肌梗死和任何血运重建)和靶病变失败(TLF)。

结果

在糖尿病患者中,完全血运重建与 POCO 风险降低相关(校正后的 HR 0.70,95%CI 0.52-0.93,p=0.016),但在非糖尿病患者中无相关性(校正后的 HR 0.90,95%CI 0.69-1.17,p=0.423)。在糖尿病(校正后的 HR 0.75,95%CI 0.49-1.16,p=0.195)和非糖尿病(校正后的 HR 1.11,95%CI 0.75-1.63,p=0.611)患者中,TLF 的风险在完全和不完全血运重建组之间无差异。在糖尿病患者中,POCO 的独立预测因素为不完全血运重建、多支血管病变、左主干病变和低射血分数,而非糖尿病患者的独立预测因素为年龄较大、外周血管疾病和低射血分数。

结论

在 3 年随访后,与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者血管造影完全血运重建的临床获益更为显著。在糖尿病患者中,缓解残余疾病可能比非糖尿病患者更为重要。

试验注册

大型药物洗脱支架注册 NCT03507205。

相似文献

1
Angiographic complete revascularization versus incomplete revascularization in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者的完全再血管化与不完全再血管化。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Apr 19;21(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01488-7.
2
FFR-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Diabetes.糖尿病患者中,基于血流储备分数(FFR)指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jun 1;10(6):603-608. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0095.
3
Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病的死亡率:一项个体患者数据的合并分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 10;391(10124):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Stepwise Provisional Versus Systematic Dual-Stent Strategies for Treatment of True Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.治疗真性左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的逐步临时与系统性双支架策略
Circulation. 2025 Mar 4;151(9):612-622. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071153. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉狭窄:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 21;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0853-1.
6
External Validation of the FREEDOM Score for Individualized Decision Making Between CABG and PCI.FREEDOM 评分用于个体化决策 CABG 与 PCI 选择的外部验证。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Apr 19;79(15):1458-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.049.
7
Predictors and Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Bailout Stenting During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Sirolimus-Coated Balloon: A Subanalysis of the Eastbourne Study.西罗莫司涂层球囊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中补救性支架置入的预测因素及长期预后意义:伊斯特本研究的亚组分析
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 15;239:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
8
Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Analysis from the e-ULTIMASTER registry.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者完全血运重建与不完全血运重建的比较:来自e-ULTIMASTER注册研究的分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Jun;75:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
9
Three-Year Clinical Outcomes With the Cilotax Dual Drug-Eluting Stent vs Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者中 Cilotax 双药物洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的 3 年临床结果。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2024 May 1;51(1). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-23-8271.
10
Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Disease.左主干病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后靶病变血运重建对长期死亡率的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 8;17(1):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.068.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-coated balloon-based versus drug-eluting stent-only revascularization in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架单独血运重建治疗糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的比较。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 May 20;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01853-0.
2
Culprit vessel vs. immediate multivessel vs. out-of-hospital staged intervention for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的罪犯血管干预与即刻多支血管干预及院外分期干预对比
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 23;9:1033475. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1033475. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Revascularization or Optimal Medical Therapy for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Trials.血运重建或最佳药物治疗稳定型缺血性心脏病:当代试验的贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Impact of prediabetes and diabetes on 3-year outcome of patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents in two large-scale randomized clinical trials.在两项大规模随机临床试验中,新代药物洗脱支架治疗的患者中糖尿病前期和糖尿病对 3 年结局的影响。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Oct 30;20(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01405-4.
3
Real-world outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with diabetes and three-vessel coronary disease: a mean follow-up 6.3 years study from China.
中国一项平均随访 6.3 年的研究:糖尿病合并三支血管病变患者不同治疗策略的真实世界结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jan 11;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01193-3.
4
Prognostic implications of coronary physiological indices in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者冠状动脉生理指标的预后意义
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug;74(8):682-690. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Complete vs Culprit-Lesion-Only Revascularization for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接血运重建与罪犯血管血运重建治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;5(8):881-888. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1251.
6
Usefulness of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve for Clinical Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes.常规血流储备分数在糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病临床管理中的作用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):272-281. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5097.
7
Better Prognosis After Complete Revascularization Using Contemporary Coronary Stents in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病患者使用当代冠状动脉支架行完全血运重建后预后更佳。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug;12(8):e007907. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007907. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
8
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
9
Natural History of Diabetic Coronary Atherosclerosis by Quantitative Measurement of Serial Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: Results of the PARADIGM Study.通过定量测量系列冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术研究糖尿病性冠状动脉粥样硬化的自然史:PARADIGM 研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Oct;11(10):1461-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus According to Insulin Treatment After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era.第二代药物洗脱支架时代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后根据胰岛素治疗情况的糖尿病患者结局
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 15;121(12):1505-1511. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.034. Epub 2018 Apr 18.