Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03843-0.
This review investigates the efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) combined with psychosocial intervention on depressive symptoms.
We systematically searched five electronic databases from their inception to June 2021: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Medline. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials in which NIBS plus psychosocial intervention was compared to control conditions in people with depressive symptoms were included.
A total of 17 eligible studies with 660 participants were included. The meta-analysis results showed that NIBS combined with psychosocial therapy had a positive effect on moderate to severe depression ([SMD = - 0.46, 95%CI (- 0.90, - 0.02), I = 73%, p < .01]), but did not significantly improve minimal to mild depression ([SMD = - 0.12, 95%CI (- 0.42, 0.18), I = 0%, p = .63]). Compared with NIBS alone, the combination treatment had a significantly greater effect in alleviating depressive symptoms ([SMD = - 0.84, 95%CI (- 1.25, - 0.42), I = 0%, p = .93]). However, our results suggested that the pooled effect size of ameliorating depression of NIBS plus psychosocial intervention had no significant difference compared with the combination of sham NIBS [SMD = - 0.12, 95%CI (- 0.31, 0.07), I = 0%, p = .60] and psychosocial intervention alone [SMD = - 0.97, 95%CI (- 2.32, 0.38), I = 72%, p = .01].
NIBS when combined with psychosocial intervention has a significant positive effect in alleviating moderately to severely depressive symptoms. Further well-designed studies of NIBS combined with psychosocial intervention on depression should be carried out to consolidate the conclusions and explore the in-depth underlying mechanism.
本综述旨在调查非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)联合心理社会干预对抑郁症状的疗效和安全性。
我们系统地检索了五个电子数据库,从建库开始到 2021 年 6 月:PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 Medline。纳入了将 NIBS 联合心理社会干预与抑郁症状患者的对照条件进行比较的随机或非随机临床试验。
共有 17 项符合条件的研究纳入了 660 名参与者。荟萃分析结果表明,NIBS 联合心理社会治疗对中重度抑郁有积极影响([SMD = -0.46,95%CI(-0.90,-0.02)],I = 73%,p < 0.01),但对轻度至中度抑郁无明显改善([SMD = -0.12,95%CI(-0.42,0.18)],I = 0%,p = 0.63)。与单独使用 NIBS 相比,联合治疗在缓解抑郁症状方面具有更显著的效果([SMD = -0.84,95%CI(-1.25,-0.42)],I = 0%,p = 0.93)。然而,我们的结果表明,NIBS 联合心理社会干预改善抑郁的汇总效应大小与假 NIBS 联合心理社会干预[SMD = -0.12,95%CI(-0.31,0.07)]和单独心理社会干预[SMD = -0.97,95%CI(-2.32,0.38)]相比没有显著差异,I = 0%,p = 0.60]。
NIBS 联合心理社会干预对缓解中重度抑郁症状有显著的积极作用。应该开展更多设计良好的关于 NIBS 联合心理社会干预治疗抑郁的研究,以巩固结论并探讨其深入的潜在机制。