LaMarre Andrea, Levine Michael P, Holmes Su, Malson Helen
School of Psychology, Massey University Auckland, Private Bag 102904, North Shore, Auckland, 0745, New Zealand.
Kenyon College, Gambier, USA.
J Eat Disord. 2022 Apr 19;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00532-x.
Despite the long history of feminist research in the field and the clear relevance of questions of gender to this sphere, many continue to question the relevance of feminism for understanding and treating eating disorders in 2022. In this set of two papers, we explore some of the tensions, omissions and misconceptions which surround feminist approaches to eating disorders. At the core of these two papers is our assertion that such approaches can make significant contributions in the eating disorders field along six key lines: enriching the science of eating disorders, unpacking diagnostics, contextualizing treatment and prevention, attending to lived experiences, diversifying methodologies, and situating recoveries. In this first paper, we outline what feminist approaches are and dig into some key tensions that arise when feminist approaches come to the table. These include critiques of sociocultural approaches to understanding eating disorders, the relationship between feminist approaches and biological and genetic attributions for eating disorders, and the role of men. We then offer a key contribution that feminist approaches have made to eating disorders scholarship: an invitation to unpack diagnostic approaches and situate eating disorders within the landscape of food, weight, and shape concerns in the twenty-first century.
尽管女性主义研究在该领域有着悠久的历史,且性别问题与这一领域明显相关,但在2022年,仍有许多人质疑女性主义对于理解和治疗饮食失调症的相关性。在这两篇论文中,我们探讨了围绕女性主义饮食失调症研究方法的一些矛盾、疏漏和误解。这两篇论文的核心观点是,这些方法可以在饮食失调症领域沿着六个关键方向做出重大贡献:丰富饮食失调症科学、剖析诊断方法、将治疗与预防置于具体情境中、关注实际生活经历、使研究方法多样化以及定位康复情况。在第一篇论文中,我们概述了女性主义方法是什么,并深入探讨了女性主义方法出现时产生的一些关键矛盾。这些矛盾包括对理解饮食失调症的社会文化方法的批评、女性主义方法与饮食失调症的生物学和遗传学归因之间的关系以及男性的角色。然后,我们阐述了女性主义方法对饮食失调症学术研究的一项关键贡献:邀请大家剖析诊断方法,并将饮食失调症置于21世纪食物、体重和体型问题的背景中。