• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施一项新的临床和组织实践以改善初级保健服务的可及性:一项有效性-实施混合研究方案

Implementation of a new clinical and organisational practice to improve access to primary care services: a protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study.

作者信息

Côté Nancy, Chouinard Rébecca, Freeman Andrew, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Breton Mylaine, Duhoux Arnaud, Ghandour El Kebir, Laberge Maude, Martin Elisabeth, Fortin Jean-Paul, Bourgeault Ivy

机构信息

Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada

Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e059792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059792.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059792
PMID:35440462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9020307/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In Canada, as in most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, healthcare systems face significant challenges in ensuring better access to primary care. A regional healthcare organisation in Quebec (Canada) serving a population of approximately 755 459 citizens has implemented a standardised access approach to primary care services for this population. The objective of this new clinical and organisational practice is to ensure that users benefit from the same referral process, regardless of the entry point, in order to be directed to the right services. This new practice integrates a shared decision-making process between the user and the professional, and a collaborative process between different health professionals within and between services. The objective of our research is to identify and characterise the conditions of implementation of this practice.

METHODS

This effectiveness-implementation hybrid investigation will use an embedded single-case study, defined in this case as the process of implementing a clinical and organisational practice within a healthcare organisation. Further to an evaluation conducted during a preliminary phase of the project, this study consists of evaluating the implementation of this new practice in four medical clinics (family medicine groups). A qualitative analysis of the data and a quantitative preimplementation and postimplementation analysis based on performance indicators will be conducted. This study is ultimately situated within a participatory organisational approach that involves various stakeholders and users at each step of the implementation and evaluation process.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sectoral Research in Population Health and Primary Care of the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (#2020-1800). The results of the investigation will be presented to the stakeholders involved in the advisory committees and at several scientific conferences. Manuscripts will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals.

摘要

引言

与大多数经济合作与发展组织国家一样,加拿大的医疗保健系统在确保更好地获得初级医疗服务方面面临重大挑战。加拿大魁北克省一个为大约755459名公民提供服务的区域医疗组织,已为该人群实施了标准化的初级医疗服务获取方法。这种新的临床和组织实践的目标是确保用户无论从哪个入口点开始,都能受益于相同的转诊流程,从而被引导至合适的服务。这种新实践整合了用户与专业人员之间的共同决策过程,以及不同医疗专业人员在服务内部和服务之间的协作过程。我们研究的目的是识别并描述这种实践的实施条件。

方法

这项有效性 - 实施混合调查将采用嵌入式单案例研究,在本案例中定义为在医疗组织内实施临床和组织实践的过程。在项目的初步阶段进行评估之后,本研究包括评估这一新实践在四个医疗诊所(家庭医学组)中的实施情况。将对数据进行定性分析,并基于绩效指标进行实施前和实施后的定量分析。本研究最终采用参与式组织方法进行,在实施和评估过程的每个步骤都涉及各种利益相关者和用户。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得国家首都综合大学健康与社会服务中心人口健康与初级保健部门研究伦理委员会的批准(#2020 - 1800)。调查结果将提交给咨询委员会的相关利益者以及多个科学会议。研究论文将提交给同行评审期刊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c3/9020307/8c0a9540ec1a/bmjopen-2021-059792f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c3/9020307/9f84cd15938e/bmjopen-2021-059792f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c3/9020307/8c0a9540ec1a/bmjopen-2021-059792f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c3/9020307/9f84cd15938e/bmjopen-2021-059792f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c3/9020307/8c0a9540ec1a/bmjopen-2021-059792f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a new clinical and organisational practice to improve access to primary care services: a protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study.实施一项新的临床和组织实践以改善初级保健服务的可及性:一项有效性-实施混合研究方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e059792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059792.
2
Evaluation of an interprofessional primary healthcare team as a new model of primary care in Quebec: a protocol for a type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study.评价以跨专业团队为基础的初级医疗作为魁北克初级医疗新模式:一项 2 型有效性-实施混合研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 30;13(5):e072006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072006.
3
Development of a self-reported reflective tool on advanced access to support primary healthcare providers: study protocol of a mixed-method research design using an e-Delphi survey.开发一种自我报告的反思工具,以支持初级保健提供者的提前获取:使用电子德尔菲调查的混合方法研究设计的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):e046411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046411.
4
Rural emergency care 360°: mobilising healthcare professionals, decision-makers, patients and citizens to improve rural emergency care in the province of Quebec, Canada: a qualitative study protocol.农村急救护理360°:动员医疗保健专业人员、决策者、患者和公民改善加拿大魁北克省的农村急救护理:一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 17;7(8):e016039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016039.
5
Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol.评价初级保健中未附属于任何医疗机构的患者的单点接入实施情况及其效果的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):e070956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070956.
6
CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers.CUP 研究:集中等待名单有效性的比较分析方案,以及将未联系患者与初级保健提供者联系起来的政策和创新。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 7;12(3):e049686. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049686.
7
Scientific, professional and experiential validation of the model of preventive behaviours at work: protocol of a modified Delphi Study.工作中预防行为模型的科学、专业及经验验证:改良德尔菲研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 13;10(9):e035606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035606.
8
Evaluation of the implementation and associated effects of advanced access in university family medicine groups: a study protocol.评价大学家庭医学组中高级访视的实施情况及其相关效果:一项研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 21;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01109-w.
9
Protocol for a mixed-method analysis of implementation of case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs.针对患有慢性病且有复杂护理需求的医疗服务频繁使用者,在初级保健中实施病例管理的混合方法分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e038241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038241.
10
Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol.基层医疗中具有复杂护理需求患者的决策需求评估:一项参与式系统混合研究综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e016400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400.

本文引用的文献

1
[Strategic framework to Support the evaluation of complex and innovative digital health projects].[支持复杂和创新数字健康项目评估的战略框架]
Sante Publique. 2020;32(2):221-228. doi: 10.3917/spub.202.0221.
2
An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs.有效性-实施混合设计简介。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Oct;280:112513. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112513. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
Experiencing integration: a qualitative pilot study of consumer and provider experiences of integrated primary health care in Australia.
体验整合:澳大利亚综合初级卫生保健中消费者与提供者体验的定性试点研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Jan 10;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0575-z.
4
How best to structure interdisciplinary primary care teams: the study protocol for a systematic review with narrative framework synthesis.如何构建最佳的跨学科基层医疗团队:一项采用叙述性框架综合法的系统评价研究方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;5(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0339-9.
5
Primary contact physiotherapy services reduce waiting and treatment times for patients presenting with musculoskeletal conditions in Australian emergency departments: an observational study.原发性接触理疗服务可减少澳大利亚急诊部门就诊的肌肉骨骼疾病患者的等待和治疗时间:一项观察性研究。
J Physiother. 2016 Oct;62(4):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
6
Accountability in healthcare organizations and systems.医疗保健组织和系统中的问责制。
Healthc Policy. 2014 Sep;10(Spec issue):8-11.
7
[Pragmatism and realism for public health intervention evaluation].[公共卫生干预评估的实用主义与现实主义]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013 Jun;61 Suppl 2:S95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.03.037. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice.共同决策:探讨将其纳入常规临床实践的关键要素和障碍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):276-84. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1078.
9
How health insurance design affects access to care and costs, by income, in eleven countries.医疗保险设计如何影响十一个国家按收入划分的医疗服务可及性和成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Dec;29(12):2323-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0862. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
10
Referral of patients with neuromuscular disease to occupational therapy, physical therapy and speech therapy: usual practice versus multidisciplinary advice.将神经肌肉疾病患者转诊至职业治疗、物理治疗和言语治疗:常规做法与多学科建议
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 May 15;29(9):717-26. doi: 10.1080/09638280600926702.