• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作中预防行为模型的科学、专业及经验验证:改良德尔菲研究方案

Scientific, professional and experiential validation of the model of preventive behaviours at work: protocol of a modified Delphi Study.

作者信息

Lecours Alexandra

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 13;10(9):e035606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035606.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035606
PMID:32928848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7488793/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To offer an in-depth understanding of preventive behaviours, those complex behaviours considered as levers to foster work prevention, recent theoretical and empirical studies permitted to develop the model of preventive behaviours at work. The next step is to validate the model with researchers, professionals and workers. This article aims to describe the study protocol that will be used to validate the model of preventive behaviours at work.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This Delphi Study proposes seven systematic steps to conduct a scientifically rigorous validation study based on scientific and professional experts' opinion. A focus group to collect workers' opinion about the model has also been included in the protocol. Thirty experts (researchers and professionals) will be selected regarding their experience (eg, at least 5 years of experience) and expertise (eg, having published at least one article as the first author in the last 3 years) towards workers' health or organisational behaviours. Workers will be recruited to have a diversity in terms of age, gender and working conditions. Quantitative data will be analysed to calculate the percentage of experts' agreement on four content validity indicators (ie, comprehensiveness, representativeness, relevance and clarity). Qualitative data will be examined through a thematic analysis strategy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval of the research ethics board of the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale Nationale has been obtained. Findings will be shared with various stakeholders inclusive of researchers, professionals and workers. Findings will be disseminated in workshops, peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

摘要

引言

为了深入理解预防行为,这些被视为促进工作场所预防的关键杠杆的复杂行为,近期的理论和实证研究促成了工作场所预防行为模型的发展。下一步是与研究人员、专业人士和工人一起验证该模型。本文旨在描述将用于验证工作场所预防行为模型的研究方案。

方法与分析

本德尔菲研究提出了七个系统步骤,以基于科学和专业专家的意见开展一项科学严谨的验证研究。研究方案中还纳入了一个焦点小组,以收集工人对该模型的意见。将根据专家在工人健康或组织行为方面的经验(例如,至少5年经验)和专业知识(例如,在过去3年中至少以第一作者身份发表过一篇文章),挑选30名专家(研究人员和专业人士)。将招募不同年龄、性别和工作条件的工人。将对定量数据进行分析,以计算专家对四个内容效度指标(即全面性、代表性、相关性和清晰度)的一致同意率。将通过主题分析策略对定性数据进行审查。

伦理与传播

已获得国家首都综合大学健康与社会服务中心研究伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将与包括研究人员、专业人士和工人在内的各利益相关方分享。研究结果将在研讨会、同行评审期刊和会议上进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/7488793/dee17039459a/bmjopen-2019-035606f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/7488793/dee17039459a/bmjopen-2019-035606f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eb7/7488793/dee17039459a/bmjopen-2019-035606f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Scientific, professional and experiential validation of the model of preventive behaviours at work: protocol of a modified Delphi Study.工作中预防行为模型的科学、专业及经验验证:改良德尔菲研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 13;10(9):e035606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035606.
2
Telework in a pandemic context: protocol of a participatory study on the effects of teleworking conditions on the well-being and social participation of workers.远程办公在大流行背景下:一项关于远程办公条件对员工福祉和社会参与影响的参与性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 24;11(8):e051099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051099.
3
How does returning to work after retirement influence older workers' health? A scoping review protocol.退休后重返工作岗位如何影响老年工人的健康?系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 27;9(3):e026446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026446.
4
EXperienceS and aTtitudes towards Agitated behaviours in Traumatic brain injury in the Intensive Care unit patients (EXSTATIC): a protocol for an interprofessional mixed-method study.《颅脑创伤患者 ICU 激越行为的体验和态度(EXSTATIC):一项跨专业混合方法研究方案》
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):e045816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045816.
5
Evaluation of an interprofessional primary healthcare team as a new model of primary care in Quebec: a protocol for a type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study.评价以跨专业团队为基础的初级医疗作为魁北克初级医疗新模式:一项 2 型有效性-实施混合研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 30;13(5):e072006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072006.
6
Implementation of a new clinical and organisational practice to improve access to primary care services: a protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid study.实施一项新的临床和组织实践以改善初级保健服务的可及性:一项有效性-实施混合研究方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e059792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059792.
7
Development of a self-reported reflective tool on advanced access to support primary healthcare providers: study protocol of a mixed-method research design using an e-Delphi survey.开发一种自我报告的反思工具,以支持初级保健提供者的提前获取:使用电子德尔菲调查的混合方法研究设计的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):e046411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046411.
8
Effects of a peer support programme for youth social services employees experiencing potentially traumatic events: a protocol for a prospective cohort study.针对经历潜在创伤性事件的青年社会服务员工的同伴支持计划的效果:一项前瞻性队列研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 24;7(6):e014405. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014405.
9
Management of problematic behaviours among individuals on long-term opioid therapy: protocol for a Delphi study.长期阿片类药物治疗个体中问题行为的管理:德尔菲研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 May 6;6(5):e011619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011619.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Healthcare Providers' Response to Gender-Based Violence: Development and Validation of an Assessment Tool Using the Modified e-Delphi Approach.加强医疗保健提供者对基于性别的暴力的应对:使用改良电子德尔菲法开发和验证一种评估工具
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71060. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71060. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Cultural Adaptation of the Actionable Health App Evaluation in Japan: Protocol for a Web-Based Modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study.日本可操作的健康应用程序评估的文化适应性:基于网络的改良德尔菲专家共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 3;12:e44469. doi: 10.2196/44469.
3
Development of evidence-based indicators for the detection of drug-related problems among ovarian cancer patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Moving toward an integrated prevention approach for mental health at work: Promoting workers' involvement through concrete actions.迈向工作场所心理健康综合预防方法:通过具体行动促进工人的参与。
Work. 2021;69(1):295-306. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213478.
2
The integrated health service model: the approach to restrain the vicious cycle to chronic diseases.整合式医疗服务模式:抑制慢性病恶性循环的方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 31;19(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4179-x.
3
Research Pearls: Expert Consensus Based Evidence Using the Delphi Method.
制定用于检测卵巢癌患者药物相关问题的循证指标。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 30;14:1203648. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1203648. eCollection 2023.
4
Fostering Stay at Work After a Period of Disability: A Scoping Review of Occupational Rehabilitation Strategies to Support Workers in the Adoption of Preventive Behaviours.促进残疾后继续工作:支持工人采用预防行为的职业康复策略的范围综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Mar;34(1):56-70. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10122-6. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Co-Design and Validation of a Family Nursing Educational Intervention in Long-Term Cancer Survivorship Using Expert Judgement.基于专家判断的长期癌症生存者家庭护理教育干预的共同设计与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 15;20(2):1571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021571.
6
Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the International Questionnaire to Measure the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q) for the Polish and Cross-Sectional Study.国际补充和替代医学使用问卷(I-CAM-Q)的波兰语翻译和跨文化调适及其横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):124. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010124.
7
[Enabling Workers to Preserve Their Mental Health: What are Ocupational Therapists Doing?].帮助员工保持心理健康:职业治疗师在做什么?
Can J Occup Ther. 2022 Jun;89(2):147-158. doi: 10.1177/00084174221076228. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
研究亮点:基于德尔菲法的专家共识证据。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3278-3282. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.004.
4
Development of preventive behavior at work: Description of occupational therapists' practice.工作场所预防行为的发展:职业治疗师实践描述
Work. 2018;61(3):477-488. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182811.
5
Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers' priorities for recovery-oriented curricula.向消费者学习:一项关于澳大利亚心理健康消费者对以康复为导向课程的优先事项的电子德尔菲研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):586-597. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12518. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
6
Methodology Update: Delphi Studies.方法学更新:德尔菲研究
Nurs Res. 2018 Sep/Oct;67(5):404-410. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000297.
7
The ranking of scientists based on scientific publications assessment.基于科学出版物评估的科学家排名。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
8
Health Literacy Competencies for Registered Nurses: An e-Delphi Study.注册护士的健康素养能力:一项电子德尔菲研究。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016 Dec 1;47(12):558-565. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20161115-09.
9
Preventive behaviour at work - A concept analysis.工作中的预防行为——概念分析
Scand J Occup Ther. 2017 Jul;24(4):249-258. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2016.1242649. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research.在心理健康研究中运用德尔菲专家共识法。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97. doi: 10.1177/0004867415600891. Epub 2015 Aug 21.