Discipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Department of Ophthalmology, The Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Eye (Lond). 2023 Apr;37(6):1088-1093. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02068-5. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
Immunogenic causes of inflammation may be difficult to differentiate in the work-up of orbital inflammatory disease. The study aims to investigate the utility of autoimmune markers in the screening for orbital inflammation. Markers studied included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (Anti-CCP) and anti-double stranded DNA antibody (Anti-dsDNA antibody).
A retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients with non-infective orbital inflammation screened for autoimmune markers at presentation. Serology was interpreted alongside clinical course and other investigations (e.g. radiographic features and histopathology). Tabulated data and Pearson's Chi-square allowed analysis of trends between serology, diagnosis and the decision to biopsy.
79 patients, between 1999 and 2021, were included (50 females, mean age was 50.4 ± 17.4 years). 28 (34.6%) patients had specific orbital inflammation and 53 (65.4%) patients had non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI). Of the 12 patients with positive serology and a specific diagnosis, only 5 (41.7%) patients had concordant serological results. There was no association between serology results and the patient undergoing biopsy (P = 0.651). Serology was unable to exclude nor differentiate NSOI from other specific conditions and ANA had limited discriminatory value between specific conditions and NSOI.
Serological testing alone may not provide a clear direction for further investigation of orbital inflammation and a biopsy may occur independently of the serological results. The value of autoimmune markers may lie in subsequent follow-up as patients may develop suggestive symptoms after an indeterminate positive result or initially seronegative disease.
在眼眶炎性疾病的检查中,可能难以区分免疫原性炎症的原因。本研究旨在探讨自身抗体标志物在眼眶炎症筛查中的应用价值。研究的标志物包括血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)、抗核抗体(ANA)、抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(ANCA)、可提取核抗原(ENA)、抗环瓜氨酸肽(Anti-CCP)和抗双链 DNA 抗体(Anti-dsDNA 抗体)。
对连续就诊的非感染性眼眶炎症患者进行回顾性单中心研究,在就诊时筛查自身抗体标志物。血清学检查结果与临床病程和其他检查(如影像学特征和组织病理学)相结合进行解释。通过表格数据和 Pearson 卡方检验分析血清学、诊断和活检决策之间的趋势。
纳入了 1999 年至 2021 年间的 79 名患者(50 名女性,平均年龄为 50.4±17.4 岁)。28 名(34.6%)患者为特定性眼眶炎症,53 名(65.4%)患者为非特异性眼眶炎症(NSOI)。在 12 名血清学阳性且有明确诊断的患者中,只有 5 名(41.7%)患者的血清学结果相符。血清学结果与患者是否接受活检之间无关联(P=0.651)。血清学检查既不能排除 NSOI,也不能区分 NSOI 与其他特定疾病,ANA 在鉴别特定疾病与 NSOI 方面的诊断价值有限。
单独进行血清学检查可能无法为眼眶炎症的进一步检查提供明确方向,活检可能与血清学结果无关。自身抗体标志物的价值可能在于后续随访,因为在不确定的阳性结果或最初的血清阴性疾病后,患者可能会出现提示症状。