Kim HyunJung
Barun Information Communications Technology Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biodefense, George Mason University, Arlington, VA, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 16;6(5):e34284. doi: 10.2196/34284.
In South Korea, COVID-19 pandemic responses, namely the 3T (testing, tracing, and treating) strategy, emerged as a new biosurveillance regime actively using new information technology (IT) and digital tools. The foundation of the Korean 3T system is epidemiological investigation efforts and clinical practices exploiting the use of new digital and IT tools. Due to these unique features, the Korean 3T system can be referred to as a "contact-based biosurveillance system," which is an advanced version of the traditional biosurveillance models (indicator-based or event-based models). This article illustrates how the contact-based biosurveillance system originated from the experience with the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak. The post-MERS Korean biosurveillance regime actively adopted the utility of new digital and IT tools to strengthen not only the ex-ante epidemic intelligence capabilities (by traditional models) but also the ex-post response and recovery capabilities (digital contact tracing and digital health intervention). However, critics claim that the Korean 3T system may violate individuals' privacy and human rights by addressing the fact that the Korean biosurveillance system would strengthen social surveillance and population control by the government as a "digital big brother" in the cyber age. Nevertheless, 3T biosurveillance promises a positive future direction for digital health practice in the current biosurveillance regimes.
在韩国,新冠疫情应对措施,即“3T”(检测、追踪和治疗)策略,成为一种积极利用新信息技术(IT)和数字工具的新型生物监测机制。韩国“3T”系统的基础是利用新数字和IT工具的流行病学调查工作及临床实践。由于这些独特特征,韩国“3T”系统可被称为“基于接触者的生物监测系统”,它是传统生物监测模式(基于指标或基于事件的模式)的高级版本。本文阐述了基于接触者的生物监测系统如何源自2015年中东呼吸综合征(MERS)疫情的经验。后MERS时代的韩国生物监测机制积极采用新数字和IT工具的效用,不仅强化了(通过传统模式的)事前疫情情报能力,还提升了事后应对和恢复能力(数字接触者追踪和数字健康干预)。然而,批评者声称,韩国“3T”系统可能侵犯个人隐私和人权,理由是韩国生物监测系统会在网络时代作为“数字老大哥”加强政府的社会监测和人口控制。尽管如此,“3T”生物监测为当前生物监测机制中的数字健康实践预示了一个积极的未来方向。