• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[连续治疗的广义倾向评分估计量概述]

[Overview on the generalized propensity scoring estimator for continuous treatment].

作者信息

Zhang Y, Gao Q, Wang T

机构信息

Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 10;43(4):572-577. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210827-00685.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210827-00685
PMID:35443315
Abstract

Among kinds of methods for causal inference in observational studies, the propensity score (PS) method to control measured confounding is more widely used. PS method usually consists of two critical steps: first, estimating the propensity score, followed by calculating the causal parameters of interest by regression, weighting, matching, and stratification. Unlike the traditional dichotomous treatment, the generalized propensity scoring estimator used for continuous treatment has been proposed in recent years. Many methods have been developed to estimate the generalized propensity score or even estimate the balancing weight directly. This paper introduces the existing estimators from both the model-based and balance-based perspectives.

摘要

在观察性研究中的各种因果推断方法中,用于控制可测量混杂因素的倾向得分(PS)方法应用更为广泛。PS方法通常包括两个关键步骤:首先,估计倾向得分,然后通过回归、加权、匹配和分层计算感兴趣的因果参数。与传统的二分治疗不同,近年来已提出用于连续治疗的广义倾向得分估计器。已经开发了许多方法来估计广义倾向得分,甚至直接估计平衡权重。本文从基于模型和基于平衡的角度介绍了现有的估计器。

相似文献

1
[Overview on the generalized propensity scoring estimator for continuous treatment].[连续治疗的广义倾向评分估计量概述]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 10;43(4):572-577. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210827-00685.
2
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Variance estimators for weighted and stratified linear dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score.使用广义倾向得分的加权和分层线性剂量反应函数估计器的方差估计量。
Biom J. 2022 Jan;64(1):33-56. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000267. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments.倾向评分分层方法用于连续治疗。
Stat Med. 2021 Feb 28;40(5):1189-1203. doi: 10.1002/sim.8835. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
5
Subgroup balancing propensity score.亚组平衡倾向评分
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):659-676. doi: 10.1177/0962280219870836. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
6
Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.平均因果效应的分层双稳健估计量。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):270-7. doi: 10.1111/biom.12157. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
A machine learning compatible method for ordinal propensity score stratification and matching.一种机器学习兼容的有序倾向评分分层和匹配方法。
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 15;40(6):1383-1399. doi: 10.1002/sim.8846. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
8
Propensity score weighting for causal subgroup analysis.倾向评分加权法在因果亚组分析中的应用。
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4294-4309. doi: 10.1002/sim.9029. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Estimating causal effects in observational studies for survival data with a cure fraction using propensity score adjustment.使用倾向得分调整法估计存在治愈比例的生存数据观察性研究中的因果效应。
Biom J. 2023 Dec;65(8):e2100357. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100357. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
10
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.