• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾向评分分层方法用于连续治疗。

Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments.

机构信息

Integrative Tumor Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2021 Feb 28;40(5):1189-1203. doi: 10.1002/sim.8835. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1002/sim.8835
PMID:33305367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8629138/
Abstract

Continuous treatments propensity scoring remains understudied as the majority of methods are focused on the binary treatment setting. Current propensity score methods for continuous treatments typically rely on weighting in order to produce causal estimates. It has been shown that in some continuous treatment settings, weighting methods can result in worse covariate balance than had no adjustments been made to the data. Furthermore, weighting is not always stable, and resultant estimates may be unreliable due to extreme weights. These issues motivate the current development of novel propensity score stratification techniques to be used with continuous treatments. Specifically, the generalized propensity score cumulative distribution function (GPS-CDF) and the nonparametric GPS-CDF approaches are introduced. Empirical CDFs are used to stratify subjects based on pretreatment confounders in order to produce causal estimates. A detailed simulation study shows superiority of these new stratification methods based on the empirical CDF, when compared with standard weighting techniques. The proposed methods are applied to the "Mexican-American Tobacco use in Children" study to determine the causal relationship between continuous exposure to smoking imagery in movies, and smoking behavior among Mexican-American adolescents. These promising results provide investigators with new options for implementing continuous treatment propensity scoring.

摘要

连续治疗倾向评分仍然研究不足,因为大多数方法都集中在二元治疗环境中。目前用于连续治疗的倾向评分方法通常依赖于加权,以产生因果估计。已经表明,在一些连续治疗环境中,加权方法可能会导致协变量平衡状况比未对数据进行任何调整时更差。此外,加权并不总是稳定的,由于极端权重,结果估计可能不可靠。这些问题促使当前开发新的连续治疗倾向评分分层技术。具体来说,引入了广义倾向评分累积分布函数(GPS-CDF)和非参数 GPS-CDF 方法。使用经验 CDF 根据预处理混淆因素对受试者进行分层,以产生因果估计。详细的模拟研究表明,与标准加权技术相比,基于经验 CDF 的这些新分层方法具有优越性。所提出的方法应用于“墨西哥裔美国人儿童烟草使用”研究中,以确定电影中连续接触吸烟图像与墨西哥裔美国青少年吸烟行为之间的因果关系。这些有希望的结果为研究人员提供了实施连续治疗倾向评分的新选择。

相似文献

1
Propensity score stratification methods for continuous treatments.倾向评分分层方法用于连续治疗。
Stat Med. 2021 Feb 28;40(5):1189-1203. doi: 10.1002/sim.8835. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
A machine learning compatible method for ordinal propensity score stratification and matching.一种机器学习兼容的有序倾向评分分层和匹配方法。
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 15;40(6):1383-1399. doi: 10.1002/sim.8846. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
A novel approach for propensity score matching and stratification for multiple treatments: Application to an electronic health record-derived study.一种新的多处理倾向评分匹配和分层方法:在电子健康记录研究中的应用。
Stat Med. 2020 Jul 30;39(17):2308-2323. doi: 10.1002/sim.8540. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
[Overview on the generalized propensity scoring estimator for continuous treatment].[连续治疗的广义倾向评分估计量概述]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 10;43(4):572-577. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20210827-00685.
5
Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.纵向数据因果推断方法比较:逆概率加权法与倾向得分法。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 14. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1198.
6
Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes.评估广义倾向评分在估计定量或连续暴露对二项结局影响中的表现。
Stat Med. 2018 May 20;37(11):1874-1894. doi: 10.1002/sim.7615. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
7
Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.通过重叠权重解决极端倾向评分对反事实生存函数估计的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;191(6):1140-1151. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac043.
8
Causal Inference with Multilevel Data: A Comparison of Different Propensity Score Weighting Approaches.基于多层次数据的因果推断:不同倾向评分加权方法的比较。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Nov-Dec;57(6):916-939. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1925521. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
Higher Moments for Optimal Balance Weighting in Causal Estimation.在因果估计中最优平衡加权的高阶矩。
Epidemiology. 2022 Jul 1;33(4):551-554. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001481. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
10
Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions.结合基于倾向评分的分层和加权方法以改善医疗保健干预评估中的因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):1065-71. doi: 10.1111/jep.12254. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Propensity Score Matching: Identifying Opportunities for Future Use in Nursing Studies.倾向得分匹配:确定其在护理研究中未来应用的机会。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Apr 27;15(5):142. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050142.
2
Evaluation of the causal effect of maternal education on the utilisation of maternal health services in Bangladesh using an observational study - a comparison of different propensity score methods and covariate adjustment.利用观察性研究评估孟加拉国孕产妇教育对孕产妇保健服务利用的因果效应——不同倾向得分方法与协变量调整的比较
Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;82(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01423-0.
3
Inference of gene-environment interaction from heterogeneous case-parent trios.

本文引用的文献

1
Matching on Generalized Propensity Scores with Continuous Exposures.基于广义倾向得分匹配连续暴露因素
J Am Stat Assoc. 2024;119(545):757-772. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2144737. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
A machine learning compatible method for ordinal propensity score stratification and matching.一种机器学习兼容的有序倾向评分分层和匹配方法。
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 15;40(6):1383-1399. doi: 10.1002/sim.8846. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
A novel approach for propensity score matching and stratification for multiple treatments: Application to an electronic health record-derived study.
从异质性病例-双亲三联体推断基因-环境相互作用
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 4;13:1065568. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1065568. eCollection 2022.
4
Robust Methods for Quantifying the Effect of a Continuous Exposure From Observational Data.从观察数据中量化连续暴露影响的稳健方法。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 Nov;26(11):5728-5737. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3201752. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
一种新的多处理倾向评分匹配和分层方法:在电子健康记录研究中的应用。
Stat Med. 2020 Jul 30;39(17):2308-2323. doi: 10.1002/sim.8540. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes.评估广义倾向评分在估计定量或连续暴露对二项结局影响中的表现。
Stat Med. 2018 May 20;37(11):1874-1894. doi: 10.1002/sim.7615. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
5
Assessing covariate balance when using the generalized propensity score with quantitative or continuous exposures.使用广义倾向评分匹配法时对数量型或连续性暴露因素进行协变量均衡性评估。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1365-1377. doi: 10.1177/0962280218756159. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Propensity score weighting for a continuous exposure with multilevel data.针对具有多级数据的连续暴露进行倾向得分加权。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2016 Dec;16(4):271-292. doi: 10.1007/s10742-016-0157-5. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
A Boosting Algorithm for Estimating Generalized Propensity Scores with Continuous Treatments.一种用于估计具有连续处理的广义倾向得分的提升算法。
J Causal Inference. 2015 Mar 1;3(1):25-40. doi: 10.1515/jci-2014-0022. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,利用倾向得分采用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)估计因果治疗效果时,朝着最佳实践迈进。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
Evaluation of the Effect of a Continuous Treatment: A Machine Learning Approach with an Application to Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury.连续治疗效果评估:一种机器学习方法及其在创伤性脑损伤治疗中的应用
Health Econ. 2015 Sep;24(9):1213-28. doi: 10.1002/hec.3189. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
10
The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study.在无放回倾向得分匹配时使用自助法:一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4306-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.6276. Epub 2014 Aug 4.