• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响居家护理中预先医疗指示的背景因素:STADPLAN 集群随机对照试验的过程评估。

Contextual factors influencing advance care planning in home care: process evaluation of the cluster-randomised controlled trial STADPLAN.

机构信息

Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.

Department for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 140, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03026-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03026-2
PMID:35443623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9020149/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The STADPLAN study is a cluster-randomised controlled trial including 27 home care services in Germany. It assesses the effect of an advance care planning (ACP) intervention delivered by trained nurses to older care-dependent patients. Patients received two ACP conversations and an information brochure. Nurses were educated through a two-day programme and topic guides structuring the conversations. Objectives of the process evaluation were to determine: [1] whether the intervention was implemented as planned, [2] which change mechanisms were observed, [3] whether targeted process outcomes were achieved and [4] in which way contextual factors influenced the implementation process.

METHODS

The process evaluation is based on a mixed methods approach following the recommendations of the UK-MRC framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. Qualitative and quantitative assessments were developed and analysed guided by a logic model comprising intervention, participants, mechanisms of change and context factors. The results of the main trial will be published elsewhere.

RESULTS

Educational programme and topic guides were mostly implemented as planned and resulted in motivation, knowledge, and perceived competencies to facilitate ACP conversations in nurses. Deviances in the performance of ACP conversations indicated patients' varied individual needs, but also obstacles like reluctance of patients and caregivers to participate actively and time constraints of nurse facilitators. Patients and caregivers reported increased awareness of ACP, planning and other activities indicating that targeted process outcomes could be achieved. The relevance of multifaceted contextual factors acting as barriers or facilitators for the engagement in ACP interventions on the individual, organisational and macro level was evident.

CONCLUSIONS

The process evaluation elicits obstacles and achievements of the ACP intervention. The logic model organised a plethora of mixed methods data into a holistic picture of multifaceted results. Nurses as ACP facilitators in home care can fulfil a crucial initiating role based on a trusting relationship with their patients. To support older care-dependent people's ACP engagement, access should be simplified. Furthermore, education for nurse facilitators and sufficient resources for service provision are needed. Independent of monetary reimbursement, healthcare providers must respect patients' choice for or against any ACP intervention.

ETHICS AND TRIAL REGISTRATION

Approved by the Ethics Committees of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (Ref.-No. 2019-045), Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg (Ref.-No. 2019-024), and University of Lübeck (Ref.-No. 19-080).

GERMAN CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER

DRKS00016886. Registered retrospectively 04/06/2019, first participant included 29/05/2019.

摘要

背景

STADPLAN 研究是一项整群随机对照试验,纳入了德国的 27 家家庭护理服务机构。它评估了由经过培训的护士为老年依赖型患者提供的预先护理计划(ACP)干预的效果。患者接受了两次 ACP 对话和一份信息手册。护士通过为期两天的方案和对话指南接受教育。该过程评估的目的是确定:[1]干预措施是否按计划实施,[2]观察到哪些变化机制,[3]是否达到了预定的过程结果,以及 [4]以何种方式影响实施过程的环境因素。

方法

该过程评估基于混合方法方法,遵循英国 MRC 框架用于开发和评估复杂干预措施的建议。根据包括干预措施、参与者、变化机制和环境因素在内的逻辑模型,制定并分析了定性和定量评估。主要试验的结果将在其他地方公布。

结果

教育计划和主题指南大多按计划实施,并使护士在促进 ACP 对话方面产生了动力、知识和感知能力。ACP 对话表现的偏差表明患者的个体需求存在差异,但也存在一些障碍,例如患者和护理人员不愿积极参与以及护士促进者的时间限制。患者和护理人员报告说,他们对 ACP、计划和其他活动的认识有所提高,这表明可以实现预定的过程结果。多方面的环境因素对个人、组织和宏观层面的 ACP 干预的参与起到了障碍或促进作用,这一点显而易见。

结论

该过程评估揭示了 ACP 干预措施的障碍和成就。逻辑模型将大量混合方法数据组织成一个多方面结果的整体图景。护士作为家庭护理中的 ACP 促进者,可以基于与患者的信任关系发挥至关重要的启动作用。为了支持老年依赖型人群的 ACP 参与,应简化访问途径。此外,还需要对护士促进者进行教育,并为服务提供充足的资源。医疗保健提供者必须尊重患者对任何 ACP 干预的选择或反对,而不仅仅是金钱上的补偿。

伦理和试验注册

由马丁路德大学哈勒-维滕贝格伦理委员会(参考编号 2019-045)、奥尔登堡卡尔冯奥西茨基大学(参考编号 2019-024)和吕贝克大学(参考编号 19-080)批准。

德国临床试验注册处

DRKS00016886。于 2019 年 4 月 6 日进行回顾性注册,于 2019 年 5 月 29 日纳入第一位参与者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb1/9022349/27feb5553430/12877_2022_3026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb1/9022349/27feb5553430/12877_2022_3026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bb1/9022349/27feb5553430/12877_2022_3026_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Contextual factors influencing advance care planning in home care: process evaluation of the cluster-randomised controlled trial STADPLAN.影响居家护理中预先医疗指示的背景因素:STADPLAN 集群随机对照试验的过程评估。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03026-2.
2
Process evaluation of a complex intervention to promote advance care planning in community-dwelling older persons (the STADPLAN study)-study protocol.一项复杂干预措施以促进社区居住老年人的预先护理计划的过程评估(STADPLAN 研究)-研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 16;21(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04529-2.
3
Study on advance care planning in care dependent community-dwelling older persons in Germany (STADPLAN): protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.德国依赖护理社区居住老年人的预先护理计划研究(STADPLAN):一项群组随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01537-4.
4
[Nurses' perspectives on their potential role in advance care planning in home care: A qualitative study].[护士对其在家庭护理预立医疗计划中潜在作用的看法:一项定性研究]
Pflege. 2022;35(6):327-335. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000903. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Effects of advance care planning in care dependent community-dwelling older persons (STADPLAN): A cluster-randomised controlled trial.照顾依赖的社区居住老年人的预先护理计划的效果(STADPLAN):一项集群随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1193-1201. doi: 10.1177/02692163231180322. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Implementing the theory-based advance care planning ACP+ programme for nursing homes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.实施基于理论的养老机构预先医疗照护计划(ACP+)方案:一项群组随机对照试验及过程评价的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jan 8;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0505-7.
7
Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation.养老院中预先医疗照护计划干预的描述:过程评估结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0713-7.
8
[Advance care planning conversations in home care: Intervention development with the Behaviour Change Wheel].[居家护理中的预立医疗照护计划对话:基于行为改变轮的干预措施开发]
Pflege. 2022;35(6):345-354. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000897. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
Effectiveness of a complex regional advance care planning intervention to improve care consistency with care preferences: study protocol for a multi-center, cluster-randomized controlled trial focusing on nursing home residents (BEVOR trial).一项复杂的区域预先医疗照护计划干预措施以提高与照护偏好的一致性的效果:一项多中心、整群随机对照试验的研究方案,重点关注养老院居民(BEVOR 试验)。
Trials. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06576-3.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of intervention by trained care managers on advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users in Japan: a pre- and post-pilot comparative study across multiple institutions.日本长期护理服务使用者中,受过培训的护理经理进行干预对预先护理计划参与度的影响:一项多机构的试点前后对比研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 23;18:26323524241281065. doi: 10.1177/26323524241281065. eCollection 2024.
2
What is known about the role of external facilitators during the implementation of complex interventions in healthcare settings? A scoping review.外部促进者在医疗保健环境中实施复杂干预措施中的作用是什么? 范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e084883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084883.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
2
Informal caregivers and advance care planning: systematic review with qualitative meta-synthesis.非正式照护者与预先照护计划:定性元综合的系统评价
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 May 5. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003095.
3
Individual, interpersonal, and health care factors associated with informal and formal advance care planning in a nationally-representative sample of midlife and older adults.
Measuring patients' medical treatment preferences in advance care planning: development and validation of the Treat-Me-ACP instrument - a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
在预先医疗照护计划中测量患者的医疗偏好:治疗我-ACP 工具的制定和验证-一项群组随机对照试验的二次分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Mar 21;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01404-8.
4
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.影响老年护理创新实施的因素:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.
5
Effects of advance care planning in care dependent community-dwelling older persons (STADPLAN): A cluster-randomised controlled trial.照顾依赖的社区居住老年人的预先护理计划的效果(STADPLAN):一项集群随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1193-1201. doi: 10.1177/02692163231180322. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
[Development and evaluation of complex interventions in nursing : Application of the medical research council's framework using the example of interventions to prevent physical restraints].[护理中复杂干预措施的开发与评估:以预防身体约束干预措施为例应用医学研究理事会的框架]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 May;66(5):523-529. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03689-1. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
与中年和老年人具有全国代表性的样本中非正式和正式的预先护理计划相关的个人、人际和医疗保健因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1806-1813. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.023. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
4
Registered nurses in expanded roles improve care in nursing homes: Swiss perspective based on the modified Delphi method.扩大角色的注册护士改善了养老院的护理:基于改良德尔菲法的瑞士观点。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):742-754. doi: 10.1111/jan.14644. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
5
Process evaluation of a complex intervention to promote advance care planning in community-dwelling older persons (the STADPLAN study)-study protocol.一项复杂干预措施以促进社区居住老年人的预先护理计划的过程评估(STADPLAN 研究)-研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 16;21(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04529-2.
6
Advance care planning: the future.预先医疗护理计划:未来。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Mar;11(1):89-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002304. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Study on advance care planning in care dependent community-dwelling older persons in Germany (STADPLAN): protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.德国依赖护理社区居住老年人的预先护理计划研究(STADPLAN):一项群组随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 17;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01537-4.
8
Interventions Guiding Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Systematic Review.干预措施指导预先医疗照护计划的讨论:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Mar;20(3):227-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
9
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.
10
Overview of Systematic Reviews of Advance Care Planning: Summary of Evidence and Global Lessons.系统评价预先医疗照护计划的概述:证据总结与全球经验教训。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Sep;56(3):436-459.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 25.