Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Germany.
Palliat Med. 2023 Sep;37(8):1193-1201. doi: 10.1177/02692163231180322. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
Most randomised controlled trials on advance care planning were conducted in people with advanced, life-limiting illnesses or in institutional settings. There are few studies on its effect in older people living in the community.
To determine the effects of advance care planning in older community dwelling people.
The STADPLAN study was a cluster-randomised trial with 12 months follow-up. The complex intervention comprised a 2-days training for nurse facilitators that delivered a formal advance care planning counselling and a written information brochure. Patients in the control group received optimised usual care, that is, provision of a short information brochure.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Home care services in three regions of Germany were randomised using concealed allocation. Care dependent clients of participating home care services, aged 60 years or older, and rated to have a life-expectancy of at least 4 weeks were included. Primary outcome was active participation in care at 12 months, assessed by blinded investigators using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13).
Twenty-seven home care services and 380 patients took part. Three hundred seventy-three patients were included in the primary analysis ( = 206 in the intervention and = 167 in the control group). There was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control group with regard to the PAM-13 after 12 months (75.7 vs 78.4; = 0.13). No differences in quality of life, anxiety and depression, advance care planning engagement, and in proportion of participants with advance directives were found between groups.
The intervention showed no relevant effects on patient activation or quality of life in community dwelling older persons, possibly indicating the need for more tailored interventions. However, results are limited by a lack of statistical power.
German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00016886.
大多数关于预先医疗照护计划的随机对照试验都是在患有晚期、生命有限的疾病的人群或在机构环境中进行的。关于其在社区居住的老年人中的效果的研究较少。
确定预先医疗照护计划在社区居住的老年人中的效果。
STADPLAN 研究是一项具有 12 个月随访的集群随机试验。复杂的干预措施包括对护士促进者进行为期两天的培训,提供正式的预先医疗照护计划咨询和书面信息手册。对照组的患者接受优化的常规护理,即提供简短的信息手册。
地点/参与者:德国三个地区的家庭护理服务采用隐蔽分配进行随机化。纳入的是参加家庭护理服务的有依赖护理需求的患者,年龄在 60 岁或以上,预计预期寿命至少为 4 周。主要结局是在 12 个月时通过盲法调查人员使用患者激活量表(PAM-13)评估的积极护理参与。
有 27 个家庭护理服务和 380 名患者参与。373 名患者纳入主要分析(干预组 206 名,对照组 167 名)。干预组和对照组在 12 个月时的 PAM-13 没有统计学上的显著差异(75.7 与 78.4; = 0.13)。两组在生活质量、焦虑和抑郁、预先医疗照护计划参与度以及有预先指令的参与者比例方面均无差异。
该干预措施对社区居住的老年人的患者激活或生活质量没有显示出相关效果,可能表明需要更有针对性的干预措施。然而,结果受到统计效力不足的限制。
德国临床试验注册处:DRKS00016886。