Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Altrecht Academic Anxiety Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Experimental Psychology and Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Mar;78:102361. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102361. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
Recent meta-analyses indicated differences in fear acquisition and extinction between patients with anxiety-related disorders and comparison subjects. However, these effects are small and may hold for only a subsample of patients. To investigate individual trajectories in fear acquisition and extinction across patients with anxiety-related disorders (N = 104; before treatment) and comparison subjects (N = 93), data from a previous study (Duits et al., 2017) were re-analyzed using data-driven latent class growth analyses. In this explorative study, subjective fear ratings, shock expectancy ratings and startle responses were used as outcome measures. Fear and expectancy ratings, but not startle data, yielded distinct fear conditioning trajectories across participants. Patients were, compared to controls, overrepresented in two distinct dysfunctional fear conditioning trajectories: impaired safety learning and poor fear extinction to danger cues. The profiling of individual patterns allowed to determine that whereas a subset of patients showed trajectories of dysfunctional fear conditioning, a significant proportion of patients (≥50 %) did not. The strength of trajectory analyses as opposed to group analyses is that it allows the identification of individuals with dysfunctional fear conditioning. Results suggested that dysfunctional fear learning may also be associated with poor treatment outcome, but further research in larger samples is needed to address this question.
最近的荟萃分析表明,焦虑相关障碍患者与对照组在恐惧获得和消退方面存在差异。然而,这些影响较小,可能只适用于部分患者。为了研究焦虑相关障碍患者(N=104;治疗前)和对照组受试者(N=93)在恐惧获得和消退方面的个体轨迹,对先前一项研究(Duits 等人,2017 年)的数据使用数据驱动的潜在类别增长分析进行了重新分析。在这项探索性研究中,主观恐惧评分、休克预期评分和惊跳反应被用作结果测量。恐惧和预期评分,但不是惊跳数据,在参与者之间产生了不同的恐惧条件反射轨迹。与对照组相比,患者在两种不同的功能失调性恐惧条件反射轨迹中占比过高:安全学习受损和对危险线索的恐惧消退不良。个体模式的分析可以确定,虽然有一部分患者表现出功能失调的恐惧条件反射轨迹,但相当一部分患者(≥50%)没有。轨迹分析相对于组分析的优势在于它可以识别出功能失调的恐惧条件反射个体。结果表明,功能失调的恐惧学习也可能与治疗效果不佳有关,但需要在更大的样本中进行进一步研究来解决这个问题。