• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定医疗激增期间影响急诊部门绩效的指标:基于共识的改进型模糊德尔菲法。

Identifying indicators influencing emergency department performance during a medical surge: A consensus-based modified fuzzy Delphi approach.

机构信息

Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.

Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0265101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265101. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265101
PMID:35446857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9022798/
Abstract

During a medical surge, resource scarcity and other factors influence the performance of the healthcare systems. To enhance their performance, hospitals need to identify the critical indicators that affect their operations for better decision-making. This study aims to model a pertinent set of indicators for improving emergency departments' (ED) performance during a medical surge. The framework comprises a three-stage process to survey, evaluate, and rank such indicators in a systematic approach. The first stage consists of a survey based on the literature and interviews to extract quality indicators that impact the EDs' performance. The second stage consists of forming a panel of medical professionals to complete the survey questionnaire and applying our proposed consensus-based modified fuzzy Delphi method, which integrates text mining to address the fuzziness and obtain the sentiment scores in expert responses. The final stage ranks the indicators based on their stability and convergence. Here, twenty-nine potential indicators are extracted in the first stage, categorized into five healthcare performance factors, are reduced to twenty consentaneous indicators monitoring ED's efficacy. The Mann-Whitney test confirmed the stability of the group opinions (p < 0.05). The agreement percentage indicates that ED beds (77.8%), nurse staffing per patient seen (77.3%), and length of stay (75.0%) are among the most significant indicators affecting the ED's performance when responding to a surge. This research proposes a framework that helps hospital administrators determine essential indicators to monitor, manage, and improve the performance of EDs systematically during a surge event.

摘要

在医疗高峰期间,资源短缺和其他因素会影响医疗系统的性能。为了提高性能,医院需要确定影响运营的关键指标,以便做出更好的决策。本研究旨在为改善医疗高峰期间急诊部的性能建立一套相关的指标模型。该框架包括一个三阶段的过程,以系统的方法调查、评估和对这些指标进行排名。第一阶段是基于文献和访谈进行的调查,以提取影响急诊部性能的质量指标。第二阶段是由一组医疗专业人员组成的小组完成调查问卷,并应用我们提出的基于共识的改进模糊德尔菲方法,该方法结合文本挖掘来解决模糊性并获得专家回复中的情感分数。最后一个阶段是根据指标的稳定性和收敛性进行排名。在这里,在第一阶段提取了 29 个潜在指标,分为五个医疗绩效因素,然后简化为 20 个一致的指标来监测急诊部的疗效。曼-惠特尼检验证实了小组意见的稳定性(p<0.05)。协议百分比表明,在应对高峰时,急诊部病床(77.8%)、每位就诊患者的护士配置(77.3%)和住院时间(75.0%)是影响急诊部性能的最重要指标之一。本研究提出了一个框架,帮助医院管理人员确定在高峰事件期间系统地监测、管理和改善急诊部性能的关键指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86db/9022798/ca9b069f7e03/pone.0265101.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86db/9022798/13eed678cea1/pone.0265101.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86db/9022798/ca9b069f7e03/pone.0265101.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86db/9022798/13eed678cea1/pone.0265101.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86db/9022798/ca9b069f7e03/pone.0265101.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying indicators influencing emergency department performance during a medical surge: A consensus-based modified fuzzy Delphi approach.确定医疗激增期间影响急诊部门绩效的指标:基于共识的改进型模糊德尔菲法。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0265101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265101. eCollection 2022.
2
Determination of service key performance indicators for emergency departments of teaching hospitals in Malaysia: A fuzzy delphi method.马来西亚教学医院急诊科服务关键绩效指标的确定:一种模糊德尔菲法。
Med J Malaysia. 2021 Nov;76(6):792-798.
3
Development of key performance indicators for emergency departments in Ireland using an electronic modified-Delphi consensus approach.爱尔兰急诊科关键绩效指标的制定:采用电子改良德尔菲共识法。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):109-14. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e5d8.
4
Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for acute poisoning in emergency departments: An e-Delphi study.构建急诊科急性中毒护理敏感质量指标:一项电子德尔菲研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4736-4749. doi: 10.1111/jan.16266. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
The development of indicators to measure the quality of clinical care in emergency departments following a modified-delphi approach.采用改良德尔菲法制定急诊科临床护理质量衡量指标。
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;9(11):1131-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01567.x.
6
Selection of quality indicators for hospital-based emergency care in Denmark, informed by a modified-Delphi process.通过改良德尔菲法确定丹麦医院急诊护理质量指标
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Feb 3;24:11. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0203-x.
7
Prioritizing performance measurement for emergency department care: consensus on evidence-based quality of care indicators.优先考虑急诊护理的绩效衡量:基于证据的护理质量指标的共识。
CJEM. 2011 Sep;13(5):300-9, E28-43. doi: 10.2310/8000.2011.110334.
8
Developing a customised set of evidence-based quality indicators for measuring workplace violence towards healthcare workers: a modified Delphi method.制定一套基于证据的定制化质量指标,用于衡量医护人员遭受工作场所暴力的情况:改良版德尔菲法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jul 4;13(3):e002855. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002855.
9
Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care.院前急救关键绩效指标的制定。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr;33(4):286-92. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204793. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Development of Nurse-Sensitive, Emergency Department-Specific Quality Indicators Using a Modified Delphi Technique.运用改良德尔菲技术制定护士敏感的、急诊科专用的质量指标。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2022;37(4):E59-E66. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000627. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the Criteria for Selecting the Right Extended Reality Systems in Healthcare Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process.使用模糊分析网络过程确定医疗保健领域中选择合适扩展现实系统的标准。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 15;25(10):3133. doi: 10.3390/s25103133.
2
Obstacles and Challenges Affecting Quality Indicators in a Complex Tertiary Emergency Center.影响复杂三级急诊中心质量指标的障碍与挑战
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Jul 31;7(4):162-174. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-10. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Leverage machine learning to identify key measures in hospital operations management: a retrospective study to explore feasibility and performance of four common algorithms.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital Capacity and Operations in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic-Planning for the Nth Patient.2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的医院容量与运营——为第N位患者做准备
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 Mar 2;1(3):e200345. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0345.
2
Pandemic fatigue and clinical nurses' mental health, sleep quality and job contentment during the covid-19 pandemic: The mediating role of resilience.新冠疫情期间的大流行疲劳与临床护士的心理健康、睡眠质量及工作满意度:心理韧性的中介作用
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Oct;29(7):1992-2001. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13383. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Modeling Emergency Department crowding: Restoring the balance between demand for and supply of emergency medicine.
利用机器学习识别医院运营管理中的关键指标:一项回顾性研究,探讨四种常见算法的可行性和性能。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02689-8.
4
Hospital performance evaluation indicators: a scoping review.医院绩效评价指标:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 1;24(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10940-1.
5
Constructing a student development model for undergraduate vocational universities in China using the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process.运用模糊德尔菲法和层次分析法构建中国本科职业院校学生发展模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 22;19(3):e0301017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301017. eCollection 2024.
6
Strategies to Measure and Improve Emergency Department Performance: A Review.衡量与改善急诊科绩效的策略:一项综述
Cureus. 2024 Jan 24;16(1):e52879. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52879. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Identifying quality indicators to measure workplace violence in healthcare settings: a rapid review.识别医疗保健环境中衡量工作场所暴力的质量指标:快速审查。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00943-w.
8
Acute care pathway assessed through performance indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in OECD countries (2020-2021): a scoping review.经合组织国家在2019-2021年新冠疫情期间通过绩效指标评估的急性护理途径:一项范围综述
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00938-7.
建立急诊拥挤模型:恢复急诊医学供需平衡。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0244097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244097. eCollection 2021.
4
Insomnia, fatigue and psychosocial well-being during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of hospital nursing staff in the United States.新冠疫情期间的失眠、疲劳和心理社会健康:对美国医院护理人员的横断面调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):5382-5395. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15566. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Factors contributing to healthcare professional burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid turnaround global survey.导致 COVID-19 大流行期间医疗专业人员 burnout 的因素:一项快速周转的全球调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0238217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238217. eCollection 2020.
6
An Integrated Approach of Machine Learning and Systems Thinking for Waiting Time Prediction in an Emergency Department.基于机器学习和系统思维的综合方法在急诊部门进行等待时间预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104143. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
7
Surge capacity of intensive care units in case of acute increase in demand caused by COVID-19 in Australia.澳大利亚因 COVID-19 导致对重症监护病房的需求急性增加时的重症监护病房容量。
Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(10):463-467. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50596. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
8
Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response.意大利伦巴第大区新冠疫情期间的重症监护利用情况:应急响应中的早期经验与预测
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1545-1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4031.
9
Identification of the most appropriate variables for measuring the efficiency of Iranian public hospitals: Using Delphi technique.确定衡量伊朗公立医院效率的最合适变量:运用德尔菲法
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jul 29;8:140. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_402_18. eCollection 2019.
10
Emergency departments key performance indicators: A unified framework and its practice.急诊科关键绩效指标:统一框架及其应用
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):915-933. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2548. Epub 2018 Jun 8.